THEHEREAFTER Posted April 30, 2007 Share Posted April 30, 2007 I love you guys.I'm noticing now that you can't post any longer without hurling a baseless insult my way. Looks like I'm winning the arguments. :laugh: No, you're not winning the arguments and it's so easy to insult you. You insult yourself. Why can't you see this? :laugh: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tr1 Posted April 30, 2007 Share Posted April 30, 2007 No, you're not winning the arguments and it's so easy to insult you. You insult yourself. Why can't you see this? :laugh: And why can't you discuss football? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BigDFan5 Posted April 30, 2007 Share Posted April 30, 2007 Look, Ware made your team so good last year, that it took a nose dive in the final five games...and everyone was pointing at the defense (though, those of us in the know realize it was the inconsisten qb play.) Those of you "in the know" know nothing. The loss of a conistent pass rush was our downfall Otherwise nice job avoing what I actually said Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
THEHEREAFTER Posted April 30, 2007 Share Posted April 30, 2007 Yeah I think most teams would love to have a talent like Slaton fall into their laps. After reading 5 pages of this thread, it's clear that only one good thing came out of it - Dolemite's line. Man that one was great. :applause: Oh, and boys fans, don't go assuming that the browns will be that bad. The NFL is the league of change. The offense that the browns have assembled is a pretty damn good one - the offensive line should be solid (if not impressive) with the addition of Steinbach and Thomas. Jamal Lewis can still run. Edwards and Jurevicius at wide out . . . Winslow at tight end. Seriously, on paper, it can be a good one. The defense is also going to get better. Wimbley is gonna be a monster pass-rusher - 11 sacks as a rookie. Well said. I still like two first rounders nonetheless. We learned our lesson from Buffalo a couple years ago. I could easily see the Browns in the area of 7-9 although I'm praying for 0-16. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BigDFan5 Posted April 30, 2007 Share Posted April 30, 2007 You asked me last week who I thought would be bad picks for the pukes...and one of the four I mentioned was?Don't duck the question. Speaking of ducking questions you ducked what I said You said Spencer and I told you that you were wrong. See you were smart enough to realize we needed OLB help so you named like 6 OLB's. I doubt you knew who spencer was before you looked it up Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
THEHEREAFTER Posted April 30, 2007 Share Posted April 30, 2007 And why can't you discuss football? I talk football with most but I like to play childish games with you for some reason? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BigDFan5 Posted April 30, 2007 Share Posted April 30, 2007 Hey, I'm just trying to call it as I see it.You guys have got some serious balls to be here saying you're in great shape. New coach, inconsistent qb, running back by committee (one of whom the organization loves so much has continued to put him on the trading block), suspect O-line that has a new addition who is a HUGE question mark, an ok LB group, and two safeties who can't cover. When you decide to be honest about your team when discussing it, please let me know. you talking about honesty is hilarious Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
THEHEREAFTER Posted April 30, 2007 Share Posted April 30, 2007 you talking about honesty is hilarious Sometimes he gets too big for his britches. I like him better when he's squirming, back-peddling, and apologizing to Om after being called a damn TROLL. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jeremiah_Johnson Posted April 30, 2007 Author Share Posted April 30, 2007 C'mon guys, this is getting ridiculous. Quit talking about football with tr1, we could have drafted Joe Montana, Jim Brown, and Deion Sanders and he would be trying to irk you. Remember, this is a guy who won't even go on record about his own teams draft so you can't flame him back. He's spineless and we all fall into his trap. Just stop it. Even Om called him a troll. And Westbrook, if you must get in a flamewar with him, and he mentions Kolb (who I think will be solid), one word........Palmer And I'm not talking about Carson. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HeHateMe Posted April 30, 2007 Share Posted April 30, 2007 So why is Jerry trying to get rid of JJ? And more importantly, why is no one interested in JJ?Try to be objective. You beleive everything you read? But since you do, then why was JJ interested in Michael Turner? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BAFGA Posted April 30, 2007 Share Posted April 30, 2007 What are you going to do if (and I did say IF) McFadden has a McGahee injury? Not that I condone that sort of thing to happen to a player, but you can't hope for a player when a whole college season is yet to be played. Start dreaming after the BCS championship. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TonyRomoProBowl Posted April 30, 2007 Share Posted April 30, 2007 So why is Jerry trying to get rid of JJ? And more importantly, why is no one interested in JJ?Try to be objective. I will step in and say this, I am not sure why they would. I really do not know if he is trying to get rid of him or if its just being reported that way...Kinda like Springs, why would Washington be tryin to trade their best CB, and why is no one interested? Truth is, we (the fans) just dont know. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
THEHEREAFTER Posted April 30, 2007 Share Posted April 30, 2007 Dallas did draft a WR early in the 4th. He will surprise many. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DWinzit Posted April 30, 2007 Share Posted April 30, 2007 I don't think Dallas did real well in the draft, but I think they got good value with OT Doug Free in the 4th round. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TonyRomoProBowl Posted April 30, 2007 Share Posted April 30, 2007 I don't think Dallas did real well in the draft, but I think they got good value with OT Doug Free in the 4th round. How did the skins do in your opinion? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DWinzit Posted April 30, 2007 Share Posted April 30, 2007 How did the skins do in your opinion?I like Landry a lot and the LB's were value picks for backups. However, I wish they traded down, addressed the DL and then packaged picks, moved up and grabbed a DB like Weddle. Based on the number of picks they had, the Skins deserve at least a C grade. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TonyRomoProBowl Posted April 30, 2007 Share Posted April 30, 2007 I like Landry a lot and the LB's were value picks for backups. However, I wish they traded down, addressed the DL and then packaged picks, moved up and grabbed a DB like Weddle. Based on the number of picks they had, the Skins deserve at least a C grade. I like Landry as well, but they must not have recieved a good enough offer to move out of the 6 spot. I would think that the D line had to be top priority in Washington, DT and DE both seem to be huge needs to fill. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DWinzit Posted April 30, 2007 Share Posted April 30, 2007 I like Landry as well, but they must not have recieved a good enough offer to move out of the 6 spot. I would think that the D line had to be top priority in Washington, DT and DE both seem to be huge needs to fill.I was pretty certain if no big offer came through and Adams wasn't available, Landry was their guy. Although most Skins fans would disagree with me, I think Carriker would have been a nice fit on the DL. It is hard to argue with the pick and cant wait to see the Landry/ST combo in action!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Merlin Emrys Posted April 30, 2007 Share Posted April 30, 2007 Do you think Jones will do the right thing and select Stephen Jackson over Julius Jones? Opps, my bad, Jones screwed already screwed that one up, just like he'll do in '08. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cassow Posted April 30, 2007 Share Posted April 30, 2007 Jones screwed already screwed that one up oh the irony...irony. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Merlin Emrys Posted April 30, 2007 Share Posted April 30, 2007 oh the irony...irony. Yes it is, Jones screws the Browns to fix his screw up while we all wait to see how he screws up in '08. It should be fun to watch. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cassow Posted April 30, 2007 Share Posted April 30, 2007 Yes it is, Jones screws the Browns to fix his screw up while we all wait to see how he screws up in '08. It should be fun to watch. I was just pointing out how ironic it was that you would joke about JJ "screwing up". The irony being that you botched the wording of the joke about it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lombardi's_kid_brother Posted April 30, 2007 Share Posted April 30, 2007 :laugh: :laugh: :laugh:In all seriousness though, if Quinn does pan out, Cleveland's #1 overall pick is going to be much too high for McFadden. I don't think Quinn will start right away. That line is still not good and they will let Charlie Frye take the hits this year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RunClintonRun26 Posted April 30, 2007 Share Posted April 30, 2007 I'm glad someone brought up the S. Jackson fiasco. Thank God the skins don't have to see that monster 2 games a year . . . With Jones, you never know who or what you'll get. For all we know, McFadden can be the clear-cut number 1 back next year and with the biggest upside in the next level (like Jackson), but Jones may want to trade back to fill up some depth (seeing how Barber will still be around in Dallas). So again, it's kind of early to count on this happening . . . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Merlin Emrys Posted April 30, 2007 Share Posted April 30, 2007 I was just pointing out how ironic it was that you would joke about JJ "screwing up". The irony being that you botched the wording of the joke about it. So that's what irony means. I must have missed that in all those literature and writing classes. Damn, thanks for giving me a message board edu-ma-cation. My point being that I focused the discussion back on the ironic fact of Jones fixing his own messup and away from a message board typo - always one of the lamest and most cliche (that means overused ) comebacks in posting. Is this a professional writing forum or a football message board? You get the point, so next time, come with something more creative. :dallasuck :dallasuck :dallasuck :dallasuck :dallasuck :dallasuck :dallasuck Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.