Santana89Moss Posted March 1, 2007 Share Posted March 1, 2007 wow they cut him cause the Saints asked him to take a pay cut Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rufus T Firefly Posted March 1, 2007 Author Share Posted March 1, 2007 If somehow we made a move with Lloyd (unlikely) and he came cheap, I wouldn't mind him. And Keenan McCardell. Same thought. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Oldskool Posted March 1, 2007 Share Posted March 1, 2007 35 years old with a recent history of groin problems? Let's not spin the wheel of bad ideas on this one... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skinsfan07 Posted March 1, 2007 Share Posted March 1, 2007 why does someone always want EVERY single FA that hits the market? We don't need him! He's old and his career is done. I doubt he gets picked up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rufus T Firefly Posted March 1, 2007 Author Share Posted March 1, 2007 Again, I brought it up in terms of a cheap depth deal, if that's possible, and if Lloyd were moved, which I said was unlikely. Calm down. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
McMetal Posted March 1, 2007 Share Posted March 1, 2007 Paging The Spaniard... React to It! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sarge Posted March 1, 2007 Share Posted March 1, 2007 He'll get picked up somewhere, but I hope not by us. We're set at receiver Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BWareofDWare94 Posted March 1, 2007 Share Posted March 1, 2007 He'll get picked up somewhere, but I hope not by us. We're set at receiver sorry, but thats funny. :laugh: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kevin11 Posted March 1, 2007 Share Posted March 1, 2007 sorry, but thats funny. :laugh:its not...we are set. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BWareofDWare94 Posted March 1, 2007 Share Posted March 1, 2007 its not...we are set. sure, keep believing that.........as long as you guys say your set, trust me i am cool with that. I happen to love the WR's you have for next year:laugh: Moss, lloydd and ARE........pure stud WR group. :laugh: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MisterPinstripe Posted March 1, 2007 Share Posted March 1, 2007 sorry, but thats funny. :laugh: Dude. Our receivers are going to blow yours out of the water this year. :silly: I understand your jealousy, but you will have to get over it and get past your homerism to really accept that you will get ownted. :dallasuck Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arsenic Posted March 2, 2007 Share Posted March 2, 2007 I could picture Horn in a Philly uniform Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jeremiah_Johnson Posted March 2, 2007 Share Posted March 2, 2007 I gotta agree with all the skins fans here. You're set at reciever. Not because they are any good mind you, but because you paid them so much money, you don't have any options, therefore...........yeah, you're set. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ZoEd Posted March 2, 2007 Share Posted March 2, 2007 why does someone always want EVERY single FA that hits the market?We don't need him! He's old and his career is done. I doubt he gets picked up. You doubt he gets picked up? How much you want to wager on that? Joe Horn is still one of the top WR in the NFL and until recently one of the few bright spots the Saints had. An 80% Joe Horn is better than our #2 and #3. Won't get picked up. :doh: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BWareofDWare94 Posted March 2, 2007 Share Posted March 2, 2007 Dude. Our receivers are going to blow yours out of the water this year. :silly:I understand your jealousy, but you will have to get over it and get past your homerism to really accept that you will get ownted. :dallasuck Number one, your just dreaming that. Dallas has a better core of WR's and its not even debatable...and number 2, you think every Skin player and set of players is better then Dallas. So just saying that does not make it true. Of course you think that, but what possible fact do you have to back up your claim? You dont, you just hope so, cause your a Redskin fan and a homer. Yes I am jealous that your #1 and #2 WR's combined had less catches and 1/2 the TD's of The Cowboys #1 WR....suuuure. Beleive that as you may. Crayton was a #3 WR and the 4th option in our off. and had 36-516-4. Your just out of your mind... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
twenty-eight Posted March 2, 2007 Share Posted March 2, 2007 Don't forget TO led the league.....in dropped balls Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BWareofDWare94 Posted March 2, 2007 Share Posted March 2, 2007 Don't forget TO led the league.....in dropped balls ok. Thats been said 50 bill. Times...I am sure you would trade Lloydd dropping a few for 13 TD"s...... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
twenty-eight Posted March 2, 2007 Share Posted March 2, 2007 ok. Thats been said 50 bill. Times...I am sure you would trade Lloydd dropping a few for 13 TD"s...... :)knew that was coming. but more importantly he led the league in dropped balls:D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BWareofDWare94 Posted March 2, 2007 Share Posted March 2, 2007 :)knew that was coming. but more importantly he led the league in dropped balls:D No, I believe the more important part would be the 13 TD's....... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ejay183 Posted March 2, 2007 Share Posted March 2, 2007 No, I believe the more important part would be the 13 TD's....... That sure helped your team out when it counted the most, in the playoffs. :dallasuck Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reic Posted March 2, 2007 Share Posted March 2, 2007 No, I believe the more important part would be the 13 TD's....... Those 13TDs sure did you good in the post season too.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arsenic Posted March 2, 2007 Share Posted March 2, 2007 Number one, your just dreaming that. Dallas has a better core of WR's and its not even debatable...and number 2, you think every Skin player and set of players is better then Dallas. So just saying that does not make it true. Of course you think that, but what possible fact do you have to back up your claim? You dont, you just hope so, cause your a Redskin fan and a homer. Yes I am jealous that your #1 and #2 WR's combined had less catches and 1/2 the TD's of The Cowboys #1 WR....suuuure. Beleive that as you may. Crayton was a #3 WR and the 4th option in our off. and had 36-516-4. Your just out of your mind... I'd take Moss over anyone Dallas has. TO and Glenn are both way past their primes. Not to mention the fact that TO is a headcase, and he cannot catch. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pointyfootball Posted March 2, 2007 Share Posted March 2, 2007 why does someone always want EVERY single FA that hits the market?We don't need him! He's old and his career is done. I doubt he gets picked up. It's like taking my kids to Toys R Us. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BWareofDWare94 Posted March 2, 2007 Share Posted March 2, 2007 I'd take Moss over anyone Dallas has.TO and Glenn are both way past their primes. Not to mention the fact that TO is a headcase, and he cannot catch. of course you would, your a Skins fan. Duh. Owens may be past his prime, but you cant deny that his body and conditioning is top notch. Glenn is running low, I know that, but even at this age, he is way better then Lloydd/ARE. Moss needs to have a huge year just to prove 05 was not a fluke. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pointyfootball Posted March 2, 2007 Share Posted March 2, 2007 As to arguement about Skins/Cowboys receivers, it's not even close. I hate TO as much as the next guy, but he, Glenn and Crayton had very good years. Top 3 WR for each team: Moss 55 catches/ 790 yds / 6 TDs Lloyd 23 catches/ 365 yds / 0 TDs ARE 32 catches/ 351 yds / 3 TDs Total 110 / 1506 / 9 Boys: TO 85 / 1180 / 13 Glenn 70 / 1047 / 6 Cray 36 / 516 / 4 Total 191 / 2743 / 23 That's not even close. Yes Brunell didn't like to throw it downfield, but the Cowboys had to endure the Statue of Liberty taking sacks, so I think it's a wash for those excuses. In a year or two it might not be true (due to age), but at this point the Cowboys receivers are better, clearly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.