twenty-eight Posted November 6, 2006 Share Posted November 6, 2006 Should have only been a 5 yard facemask penalty on that last play Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
No_Pressure Posted November 6, 2006 Share Posted November 6, 2006 Am I the only one who saw Crayton push off of Springs on that big catch he had? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hauss Posted November 6, 2006 Share Posted November 6, 2006 The refs were just awful--the Cowboys could have easily have over 200 yards of penalties. What kills me is some of the ones they don't call happened right in front of them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hobbs Posted November 6, 2006 Share Posted November 6, 2006 Only in Redskin-land could fans of a team that was the recipient of a 2-1 penalty ratio and was +110 in penalty yards, complain about the refs trying to give the game to the other team. Just be thankful that the refs somehow turned an inadvertent facemask (5 yard penalty) into a flagrant facemask (15 yards) which allowed your kicker even to attempt the game winning field goal. The irony of that blown call is if Koiser had sprained Taylor's neck by grabbing onto his mask and holding on at all cost he would have been down at the Dallas 19 and the 15 yard penalty would only have moved the ball out to the Dallas 34. That would have meant overtime. And the way that game was going......... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
laurent Posted November 6, 2006 Share Posted November 6, 2006 Should have only been a 5 yard facemask penalty on that last play This has been discussed ad nauseum and no, it should not have been a 5 yard penalty. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
elkabong82 Posted November 6, 2006 Share Posted November 6, 2006 The refs screwed up all game. There was one instance where they called holding, during a Dallas punt return, on Dallas. Then, they changed their minds (after the players were coming onto the field, and called it on the Skins, screwed up the player they were calling it on, repeated his name and number twice because they couldn't get it right the first time, and then the Skins punting team had to come back on the field and re-punt from further away. Thankfully Frost booted it about 57 yds. The refs were sloppy all day. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skins11 Posted November 6, 2006 Share Posted November 6, 2006 No.Not at all. Even the slightest bit. You can challenge that? I guess so... I think I vaguely remember getting screwed by it at some point in the past... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
laurent Posted November 6, 2006 Share Posted November 6, 2006 Only in Redskin-land could fans of a team that was the recipient of a 2-1 penalty ratio and was +110 in penalty yards, complain about the refs trying to give the game to the other team. You should be glad the refs showed mercy on your undisciplined joke of a team or you would have likely set a record for penalty yardage. What a complete joke for you inbred moron to show up here and try to lecture us on what was clear as day bias. Crawl back under your rock troll. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TradeTheBeal! Posted November 6, 2006 Author Share Posted November 6, 2006 You can challenge that? I guess so... I think I vaguely remember getting screwed by it at some point in the past... I am 99% certain that the play was challengeable. I am far less certain that it would have been overturned. Nevertheless, it was an awful non-call...among many. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lucky*13 Posted November 6, 2006 Share Posted November 6, 2006 The one that got me really mad was the leg whip-tripping non call on randle el,he was on his way to the house. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skins11 Posted November 6, 2006 Share Posted November 6, 2006 You should be glad the refs showed mercy on your undisciplined joke of a team or you would have likely set a record for penalty yardage. Not only that, but the game wouldn't have been close, and we wouldn't have needed to win on a last second field goal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hobbs Posted November 6, 2006 Share Posted November 6, 2006 The one that got me really mad was the leg whip-tripping non call on randle el,he was on his way to the house. It got us Cowboy fans upset as well since a Redskin defender had a hold of his shoulder pads and was pulling him out of the way and onto the ground. Big shock the refs missed that call (not!). You should be glad the refs showed mercy on your undisciplined joke of a team or you would have likely set a record for penalty yardage. Hey Gibbs needed all the help his team could get. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MonkFan8 Posted November 6, 2006 Share Posted November 6, 2006 It's hard to argue your case when even the announcers were commenting on every blown call. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TradeTheBeal! Posted November 6, 2006 Author Share Posted November 6, 2006 It got us Cowboy fans upset as well since a Redskin defender had a hold of his shoulder pads and was pulling him out of the way and onto the ground. Big shock the refs missed that call (not!). That's f***in' hilarious. I mean, say you outplayed us (mostly, you did), but don't for a moment say that you were victimized by the officials. If anything, you were victimized by T.O.! Be a man about it, for pete's sake! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bubba9497 Posted November 6, 2006 Share Posted November 6, 2006 Only in Redskin-land could fans of a team that was the recipient of a 2-1 penalty ratio and was +110 in penalty yards, complain about the refs trying to give the game to the other team. Just be thankful that the refs somehow turned an inadvertent facemask (5 yard penalty) into a flagrant facemask (15 yards) which allowed your kicker even to attempt the game winning field goal. The irony of that blown call is if Koiser had sprained Taylor's neck by grabbing onto his mask and holding on at all cost he would have been down at the Dallas 19 and the 15 yard penalty would only have moved the ball out to the Dallas 34. That would have meant overtime. And the way that game was going......... :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: The pokes are the lucky ones for the penalty ratio should have been 3 or 4 to 1 oh learn the rules before spotting off about what was, and should have been. 15 Yard face mask penalty = Twisting, turning, or pulling an opponent by the facemask. per NFL.com http://www.nfl.com/fans/rules/penaltysummaries Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
str8jacket Posted November 6, 2006 Share Posted November 6, 2006 Yeah that was one of the many bad non-calls/calls made in this games. The refs really need to get it together they just are not as good as they used to be. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChocolateCitySkin Posted November 6, 2006 Share Posted November 6, 2006 yeah, i was at teh game and my friend and i were yelling that that was a forward pass... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bubba9497 Posted November 6, 2006 Share Posted November 6, 2006 It got us Cowboy fans upset as well since a Redskin defender had a hold of his shoulder pads and was pulling him out of the way and onto the ground. Big shock the refs missed that call (not!). Hey Gibbs needed all the help his team could get. where is his jersey grabbed???? where was he dragged to the ground???? even after the play... his jersery looks like it was pressed new... no "holding" wrinkles :rotflmao: he fell to the ground because he was on one leg.... the other was being hit By Randle El when he was tripped....and you better look up the holding rule, because the poke player was "holding" the Skin player exactly the same on the arm :laugh: as usual completely got it wrong again....whoops Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skinzplay Posted November 6, 2006 Share Posted November 6, 2006 You can judge from my previous posts that I never blame anything on the officials, but Terry McAulay's crew is one of the WORST in the league. Not just that, but they seem to call things the Cowboy way whenever they do a 'Boys game. Anyone remember that game against Carolina last season down in Charlotte? Yes, that was McAulay and his crew. Ridiculous. And for those pointing out that Dallas had more penalty yards, you are overlooking the fact that many of Washington's penalties were declined, so you don't have a true picture of just how many penalties and how many penalty yards were amassed by the Skins. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kevinklein Posted November 6, 2006 Share Posted November 6, 2006 I was incensed at the egregious ones:- Non-hold on Witten - Hold on Fauria negating Lloyd's catch - Romo sits to pee waaaaaaay over the line on 3rd down Each of these were huge plays. I can understand a non-hold, for there is holding on every play I'm convinced, but I don't know how Fauria got called for a hold. He got absolutely decleated by Ware on that play- how could he have held? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
truecwbyfan Posted November 6, 2006 Share Posted November 6, 2006 Well Redskin fans all I have to say iswhat a game. I wont get into the officiating because basically it means nothing and the refs missed many calls against the Redskins as well. The Cowboys gave this game away and when you miss the opportunities and give a very hungry team the opportunities to stick around and take advantage of those missed opportunities you lose. Grats to the Skins who stuck in there and took away a victory in probably the most bizzare game I think I have ever seen. One more thing and I send this out to T.O. "if you are going to run your mouth the way you do, CATCH THE DAMN BALL"!! Nice that he has more drops than any other receiver in the league. But atleast he has 22million reasonsto be happy. Again Grats Skin fans and yes I still hate you all. Disheartened Cowboys fan P.S. Atleast it looks we have our QB Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hobbs Posted November 6, 2006 Share Posted November 6, 2006 where is his jersey grabbed???? where was he dragged to the ground???? This post is a standing testament to fans seeing only what they want to see. In the following photo the redskin defender (standing on the 40 arrow) has a hold of the shoulder pads of the dallas defender. http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v481/bubba9497/TV2006110601464300.gif Curiously enough, given the logic here, the Dallas defender is by his own account freely going away from the play due to no untoward act by the redskin defender who has his arms outstretched on teh Dallas player. BTW - Care to riddle this. How come the Dallas defender never squares his body toward the ball carrier from frame one onward? If he's not being held, then how come he never squares or turns his body towards the ball carrier. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fuji869 Posted November 6, 2006 Share Posted November 6, 2006 I thought he was over the line too. Oh well, water under the bridge now though. Ditto :wewantd: :dallasuck :wewantd: :dallasuck Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bubba9497 Posted November 6, 2006 Share Posted November 6, 2006 This post is a standing testament to fans seeing only what they want to see. In the following photo the redskin defender (standing on the 40 arrow) has a hold of the shoulder pads of the dallas defender. http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v481/bubba9497/TV2006110601464300.gif Curiously enough, given the logic here, the Dallas defender is by his own account freely going away from the play due to no untoward act by the redskin defender who has his arms outstretched on teh Dallas player. BTW - Care to riddle this. How come the Dallas defender never squares his body toward the ball carrier from frame one onward? If he's not being held, then how come he never squares or turns his body towards the ball carrier. look again... he is holding his upper arm :laugh: follow the sequence it is quite obvious, even in this pic it is as obvious it wasn't holding 1. as long as your arm is straight and not hooked outside the defenders arms, you can hold onto jeresey or shoulder pads, arm etc... 2. The reson he doesn't square up is simple... he didn't have time DUH! Both players are engaged with each other, and the pokes plyers momentum is going past Randle Els cut back... so he clearly sticks his leg out to trip him, causing him to fall forward and to the ground Spin it all you won't doesn't change the truth but you are right, YOU are only seeing what you want to see :laugh: but even with your poke colored specs claiming holding is a huge stretch at best Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KillaCam21 Posted November 6, 2006 Share Posted November 6, 2006 ST is a flash of white in every one of those pics except for the last one. What a beast. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.