stevenaa Posted March 6, 2006 Share Posted March 6, 2006 Going to get overturned, eventually, IMO. No exceptions for rape or incest. http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/11699703/ PIERRE, S.D. - Gov. Mike Rounds signed legislation Monday banning nearly all abortions in South Dakota, setting up a court fight aimed at challenging the 1973 U.S. Supreme Court decision that legalized abortion. The bill would make it a crime for doctors to perform an abortion unless the procedure was necessary to save the woman’s life. It would make no exception for cases of rape or incest. Planned Parenthood, which operates the state’s only abortion clinic, in Sioux Falls, has pledged to challenge the measure in court Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HOF44 Posted March 6, 2006 Share Posted March 6, 2006 Not this whole discussion again. :doh: Put your tray tables up and move all chairs to an upright and locked postion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SkinInsite Posted March 6, 2006 Share Posted March 6, 2006 What's stopping them from driving to North Dakota? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
@DCGoldPants Posted March 6, 2006 Share Posted March 6, 2006 What's stopping them from driving to North Dakota? I don't know. They might post folks at the borders to make sure. Well, now we can't call South Dakota "The Abortion Capital of America" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Redskins Diehard Posted March 6, 2006 Share Posted March 6, 2006 What's stopping them from driving to North Dakota? They aren't granting Visa's for interstate travel. Part of the attempt to stem the flow of illegal immigrants. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Weirdo Posted March 6, 2006 Share Posted March 6, 2006 Intense stuff. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ashburnskinsfan Posted March 6, 2006 Share Posted March 6, 2006 What's stopping them from driving to North Dakota? I hope you're not suggesting that this is just a bunch of politicians 'grandstanding'? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kilmer17 Posted March 6, 2006 Share Posted March 6, 2006 Paging Justice Alito, your table is now available. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rocky21 Posted March 6, 2006 Share Posted March 6, 2006 The bottom line is that will have no effect on a woman who wants an abortion in South Dakota. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ashburnskinsfan Posted March 6, 2006 Share Posted March 6, 2006 The bottom line is that will have no effect on a woman who wants an abortion in South Dakota. I guess the lawmakers had nothing better to do with their time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Predicto Posted March 6, 2006 Share Posted March 6, 2006 The bottom line is that will have no effect on a woman who wants an abortion in South Dakota. Assuming you have enough money and free time to travel somewhere else. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PleaseBlitz Posted March 6, 2006 Share Posted March 6, 2006 Great, just what we need. More South Dakotans. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
portisizzle Posted March 6, 2006 Share Posted March 6, 2006 ...and the defeat of liberalism in America is coming into clear focus....... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rebornempowered Posted March 6, 2006 Share Posted March 6, 2006 Planned Parenthood, which operates the state’s only abortion clinic, in Sioux Falls, has pledged to challenge the measure in court Interesting piece of info. The abortion doctor in South Dakota brought me into the world believe it or not. No, I was not a botched job. He switched specialties about 5 years later. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rebornempowered Posted March 6, 2006 Share Posted March 6, 2006 ...and the defeat of liberalism in America is coming into clear focus....... Testify!!!!!!!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rocky21 Posted March 6, 2006 Share Posted March 6, 2006 Assuming you have enough money and free time to travel somewhere else. South Dakota’s abortion ban is to take effect July 1, but a federal judge is likely to suspend it during a legal challenge. S.D. Govenor Mike Rounds issued a written statement saying he expects the law will be tied up in court for years and will not take effect unless the U.S. Supreme Court upholds it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kilmer17 Posted March 6, 2006 Share Posted March 6, 2006 How dare a state attempt to make it's own state law. Where is Lincoln when you need him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rebornempowered Posted March 6, 2006 Share Posted March 6, 2006 Great, just what we need. More South Dakotans. Excuse me!?!?!? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rebornempowered Posted March 6, 2006 Share Posted March 6, 2006 How dare a state attempt to make it's own state law.Where is Lincoln when you need him. :notworthy :notworthy :notworthy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PleaseBlitz Posted March 6, 2006 Share Posted March 6, 2006 Excuse me!?!?!? I KEEEEED, I KEEEEED! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SkinInsite Posted March 6, 2006 Share Posted March 6, 2006 How dare a state attempt to make it's own state law.Where is Lincoln when you need him. So will SD be able to operate their state government and services without asking for federal money. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rincewind Posted March 6, 2006 Share Posted March 6, 2006 How dare a state attempt to make it's own state law.Where is Lincoln when you need him. :notworthy :notworthy :notworthy Okay let me get this straight - State makes a law against abortion - good, the state is making its own laws. State makes a law against owning a gun (California/San Fran) - bad and unconstitutional. :whoknows: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kilmer17 Posted March 6, 2006 Share Posted March 6, 2006 Okay let me get this straight -State makes a law against abortion - good, the state is making its own laws. State makes a law against owning a gun (California/San Fran) - bad and unconstitutional. :whoknows: Are you really asking this? One is a Constituionally granted right. The other is not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rebornempowered Posted March 6, 2006 Share Posted March 6, 2006 I KEEEEED, I KEEEEED! I know but as a native South Dakotan I couldn't let it go uncontested. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rincewind Posted March 6, 2006 Share Posted March 6, 2006 Are you really asking this?One is a Constituionally granted right. The other is not. And one is held up as federal law by the Supreme Court. So its alright to thumb your nose at the highest court in the land? And my point was that a majority of people in San Fran voted to have guns banned and there was an uproar that places shouldn't be allowed to make their own laws. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.