CrossWalker Posted February 9, 2006 Share Posted February 9, 2006 Randel-El because of his versatility and team attitude. Owens is a cancer. He just doesn't get it, the offense will NEVER be about him. He's a reciever, his whining about not being the man as a wide-out is like pissing into the wind. You can piss as hard as you want, it's always going to land on your shoes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
praise_gibbs Posted February 9, 2006 Share Posted February 9, 2006 If I want to win a super bowl Randel ElIf I want to win the super Bowl and have fun doing it TO Perfect answer! But gun or no gun to my head I am going with Randel El. Watch the Super Bowl again and you will see the potential this man has.. Our offense would be sick: Moss, Randel El, Cooley, Portis, and Sellers! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest amaprius Posted February 9, 2006 Share Posted February 9, 2006 TO is the easy pick. He is a far better WR. He would be kept in line by GW. He would learn by LA's example last year. If you act up, you dont play, no matter how good you are. I think he learned that with Reid last year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hokie_Skinz Posted February 9, 2006 Share Posted February 9, 2006 Perfect answer!But gun or no gun to my head I am going with Randel El. Watch the Super Bowl again and you will see the potential this man has.. Our offense would be sick: Moss, Randel El, Cooley, Portis, and Sellers! I am going to have to agree completely here. You have an added angle with Randel El, he is fast, and always seems to get open. And his ability to throw means you always have to be watching for that. Can you picture it, a double reverse to Randel El, who hits Moss deep. Portis tried once or twice this year and couldn't get the the pass of accurately. But with Randel El thats no longer a problem. Plus, TO i'm sure would be too much of a hassle. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ItaliaMuscle Posted February 9, 2006 Share Posted February 9, 2006 My Myers-Briggs says I would take T.O. Thank god Gibbs is here. HA! yeah... i'd say T.O. if it wasn't him with the gun to my head.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PleaseBlitz Posted February 9, 2006 Share Posted February 9, 2006 TO. With an incentive laden contract. TO takes playoff teams (Eagles) and makes them Super Bowl teams. He is a dominating WR that destroys defenses. Randle El is a complementary kind of guy and was 3rd string until this year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Renegade7 Posted February 9, 2006 Share Posted February 9, 2006 TO, and then I'd get shot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dent19 Posted February 9, 2006 Share Posted February 9, 2006 No TO. Just say no. you are sick.... :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :doh: :doh: :laugh: :laugh: but i would take TO,,,,,it will be a media circus but we can handle it....... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dent19 Posted February 9, 2006 Share Posted February 9, 2006 No TO. Just say no. you are sick.... :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :doh: :doh: :laugh: :laugh: but i would take TO,,,,,it will be a media circus but we can handle it....... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ddub52 Posted February 9, 2006 Share Posted February 9, 2006 This may have been said already but... :sucks: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scribble Posted February 9, 2006 Share Posted February 9, 2006 Randle El for me, the guy is a good reciever and T.O. is just too much hassle that the Redskins dont need. It's all about the team, I think Randle El would get that but T.O. wouldnt know what the hell that philosophy meant. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SkinsFTW Posted February 9, 2006 Share Posted February 9, 2006 If I want to win a super bowl Randel ElIf I want to win the super Bowl and have fun doing it TO Yeah, because we all know that TO is the man who gets teams to the SB and they win. I mean, seriously. I wouldn't want either one of those receivers very much, especially not TO. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SinceIwasaLittleGuy66 Posted February 9, 2006 Share Posted February 9, 2006 I would tell the guy with the gun to F off and duck, hoping that when he fired the gun he'd hit T.O. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrMan978 Posted February 9, 2006 Share Posted February 9, 2006 This is a easy discuss, TO for 1 year because it shows he's a model citizen for the first year, than after that he loses his mind. So TO for 1 year than cut him after we win the super bowl, cause with TO we will go to the super bowl, and we will have a super bowl song. TO is cool person, I played basketball with him before. He just likes attention. Bring him to DC baby!!!!!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
G-Prime Posted February 9, 2006 Share Posted February 9, 2006 Randle El for me, the guy is a good reciever and T.O. is just too much hassle that the Redskins dont need. It's all about the team, I think Randle El would get that but T.O. wouldnt know what the hell that philosophy meant. He's a fast 50/50.. He's not good and you people who say he is need to wake up. You've heard a name and latched on to it, and now most of you are just parroting what you've heard before. Worst thing about the offseason is all the damn parroting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChiefPowhatan17 Posted February 9, 2006 Share Posted February 9, 2006 Randle El, cause he is not a cancer in the lockerroom. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chachie Posted February 9, 2006 Share Posted February 9, 2006 If I had time to consider, I'd probably end up choosing Randle-El. That way I'd be getting a WR, a KR, and a QB. 3 players in 1. With the gun to my head? I'd say, "Pull the trigger before I choose Terrell Owens." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
usc35 Posted February 9, 2006 Share Posted February 9, 2006 ...and you have to choose one WR for the Redskins from the following two candidates:Terrell Owens Antwaan Randle El Who do you choose, and why??? I'd take the bullet, because I don't want either of these guys. My reasons for not wanting T.O. are obvious and too lengthy to list here. Randle El has never proven to be anything more than a decent (maybe) receiver. He had a 50 % catch percentage last year (50-50, remind you of anyone? hint......RG) The only reason I would like to have him is for his return skills, but he'd be pretty pricey for that. So give me the the bullet and save me the misery of having to put up with the heartache either of these guys would bring. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
usc35 Posted February 9, 2006 Share Posted February 9, 2006 Randle El for me, the guy is a good reciever and T.O. is just too much hassle that the Redskins dont need. It's all about the team, I think Randle El would get that but T.O. wouldnt know what the hell that philosophy meant. Sorry, but how can you say Randle El is a "good" receiver? 50% catch percentage last year, flat out sucks! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MidPennSkin Posted February 9, 2006 Share Posted February 9, 2006 I'd take Randle-El because he wouldn't destroy the team. He might not add anything, but at least we'd still have a team. Unlike the Eagles and 49ers, who are doomed to suckage for the forseeable future because of TO. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pjmjr123 Posted February 9, 2006 Share Posted February 9, 2006 Randle El: 1. he is fast as the dickens, 2. he can return punts and kick offs, 3. he is not a premadonna, 4. he knows what it takes to win a superbowl, 5. he can throw the ball well. There wasn't even a second thought in my mind to go with Randle El. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thelarkascend1ng Posted February 9, 2006 Share Posted February 9, 2006 i'd pull ninja moves on whoever had the gun to my head. or call Sean Taylor. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
triple6mafia Posted February 9, 2006 Share Posted February 9, 2006 Randle El without a doubt. NO way i'd take a chance w/ TO ruining team chemistry Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cheeks Posted February 10, 2006 Share Posted February 10, 2006 well if TO had a better attitude than he would already be signed to the redskins..... but hes not........ so in this case i would choose TO if T.O. had a better attitude than he would still be with the eagles or maybe even the 49er's his attitude is the whole reason he's leaving or off those teams.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DJCrash34 Posted February 10, 2006 Share Posted February 10, 2006 Randle El, I wouldn't want to take a chance on destroying the team philosophy that gibbs has been building here Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.