Jump to content
Washington Football Team Logo
Extremeskins

Peregrine

Members
  • Posts

    9,376
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Peregrine

  1. Which is why Ive been working on a complex formula for months that takes every other almost meaningless stat and converts it to sacks, which gave me 3 for this game for Chase. Its tough though, for example 24 passing TDs comes out to 1 sack due to how worthless they are compared to sacks.
  2. What was it just 2 days ago I said I felt with the way he was playing he was due to have a 3 sack game? Well, this was that game, not 3 sacks but better, a sack, FF, FR, TD.
  3. I love the weekly "Chase young is playing great" vs "He didnt get a sack today cut him now" updates to this thread. With the way hes playing, hes likely to have a 3 sack game before the end of the season. No one is thinking the safety duo of Collins and Apke is capable of stopping a pass from even John Beck, so the fact we are #1 against the pass tells you we have probably the best DLine in the league.
  4. As we expected, with a good defensive coordinator this D-Line finally got to prove that it was indeed one of the best in the NFL. We werent crazy after all, just Bruce and Jay were.
  5. Im not saying we all hoped Chase Young wouldnt have more impressive numbers on this point. Im not even saying any team success is directly attributable to him. But we were terrible without him, and now we are #1 in pass D, #6 in total defense, and top 10 in points allowed with an offense giving away free field position. If he gets double teamed every play freeing up other players to make plays thats just as good as if he makes the sacks himself. This D is 20 ranks higher in just about every category over last season, and the only changes are Fuller, Chase Young, and Del Rio. So its either all Fuller, all Del Rio, or maybe, just maybe, those 3 have each had a huge impact in how this team plays. The last thing Im doing right now is criticizing anyone involved in this teams Pass D.
  6. I mean, Turner was a bad OC in Carolina, why would he expect he would all of the sudden become a great one here? If you add a guy like Turner, you are basically saying you think hes not good yet because hes young, but that you think he will learn and grow into a good OC. But that takes time. Theres no way you look at this time in Carolina and go "He was bad there but hes going to magically be good in his first few games here".
  7. Its amazing, Snyder fires some people, then hires some people only in response to a couple of damning reports that might take down his organization and some of you go for the 30th time"Oh look hes changed" Fools will always be fools.
  8. Seriously, are you the worlds worst forum plant to boost the owner? So far in the just the last two pages of this thread you've said Tanya requested to be more involved(despite no one else in the world knowing that), that a billionaire trying to prostitute out his cheerleader is okay if you dont say the word sex, that really its okay because a man wanted to have sex with her, and that it doesnt matter how many women come forward because its old news.
  9. Whats also horrible about all of this is......Dan Snyder, the most hands on, handsy and involved owner in all of the NFL, is now going to be the opposite of gone: even more hands on
  10. No, what you are is an idiot who either does actually love Dan Snyder, or closet supports some of the things that were going on but knows others view it as morally reprehensible. Anyone with half a brain knows that once the first article comes out with numerous accounts, it would embolden others who had always thought speaking out would lead to them being railroaded. This has happened almost every time in modern history with something like this. It was blindingly obvious at the time that if there was truth to it, more people would come out because of the article and a followup with more serious allegations would occur.
  11. Now I hope the guy ends up being a really great President, fans get a much better experience, and all of the other hires also work out. But man these hires seem quick and suspiciously like Snyder is trying to reactionarily placate the critics at all costs. Snyder left Cerrato in charge for a decade. Then Allen for a decade. Then when he fires Allen he leaves all of the toxic people that he knew were toxic in place. Then, a week after a damning report comes out he fires people and promotes a woman to leadership. Then allegations come out of a Rooney rule investigation and a couple weeks later he suddenly hires an unheard of minority candidate. I'll believe it's not fishy as can be once there are some actual results, but I'm expecting In a year or so there's a big blowout, more drama, and a couple of these new hires get fired/leave. The only other way this makes any sense otherwise is if Ron Rivera has said "I own this organization and will be choosing everybody" and Snyder has said "okay" for now.
  12. I think Ron, barring an ownership chain, has free reign to do whatever he wants for at least 3 years, and most likely more as long as its not a disaster.
  13. Yeah, he may not be a good guy, but Id at least take a ruthless winner vs a ruthless loser...
  14. Dont look now, but Jeff Bezos just sold a portion of his Amazon shares. How much you ask? $3.1 billion, or also known as just about what it would cost to buy the Washington Football Team(est 1923).
  15. I had to look him up, a long time best friend of Snyder who has been the Redskins CMO for many years on multiple occassions. Became CMO in 2006. I believe Bateman was then replaced by Lafemina when he came in, and then Bateman was the one who ran the "we fired Lafemina" meeting a year later. He has had some exec role for the Redskins for the past 14 years or so, so just a slight change in title. Hes been the Redskins Executive Vice President for a number of years, just seems maybe not last year? He was a long time member of that exec culture, so I think it would be quite something for Snyder if a month after he gets "hired" allegations come out against him.
  16. I believe there were also: -Larry Michaels would use TV time as an incentive to try and get women to sleep with him -Former CFO Nico Foris made his interns sleep with him -There was an unofficial "no broads and blacks" back balcony in the building(not Snyder, but other members of the organization) -Dan keeping mistresses of the execs on payroll so they wouldnt talk and encouraged the behavior -Media personnel slept with front office regularly to get scoops
  17. Dan will not be fine. Sure, there wont be any major new news dropped in the next couple of days, but there are people right now collecting sources and information for whats to come out in the coming months. The advantage Snyder has is a massive amount of money, people afraid of being sued, and the main players all terrified of also being taken down for their their parts in it. But the main disadvantage he has is that these days everyone hates him, he has more enemies than even he can keep track of, and he just had a bunch of enemies get emboldened by those who have now put a voice to the truth. His support has been going downhill for the past decade, with scandals getting more and more prevalent, and this didnt reverse the course, but accelerated it.
  18. And if others who have been directly around Snyder 50 times longer than the other players say hes sexually assaulted people, which one of these will you trot out: 1. They're being paid by people who hate Snyder 2. They're just trying to take down his company 3. What do you expect them to say 4. Bezos lawyers probably got a hold of them already Let me know soon, bingo sucksšŸ˜‰
  19. Good to see where the truth lies, you're incredible ability to be on the wrong side of every important issue means its comforting to see you on the Snyder train, after having finally had to get off the Allen train once it derailed permanently. You cant save him califan, no matter how much you want to.
  20. I get that, but thats what evil people rely on, absolute "proof". To them, it doesnt matter if 4 people come forward, if you dont have proof, and how could you because they destroy it, it doesnt matter if you witnessed it with your own eyes. For Dan to be forced to sell proof isnt needed, just enough for most people to believe he definitely did this stuff. In one breath people scream "But hes just a disgruntled former employee', yet those same people scoff at "But hes just a disgruntled former employer who would lie because he loses everything". Theres way too much smoke here, and this house of cards is starting to burn. If some people cant identify someones character, thats on them. You have to literally decide to take the word of Dan Snyder over Kapri Bibbs if the two disagree.
  21. He literally did, he just happened to tell the truth in an interview with a 16 year old. But thats next level and 100% backs up what the likes of Harrison Weinhold had been saying from their sources. It doesnt need an ESPN interview, and itll be interesting to note how quiet all the beat writers will be on it. If the beat writers dont pick up this interview from a former player confirming that stuff, then thats pretty suspicious to me.
  22. That cant really be Bibbs. I mean that would be a bombshell bigger than the first, that would also start to substantiate the more juicy harder to believe rumors.
  23. Here was his response the day after allegations. Note that he didnt terminate any execs who had allegations immediately, and both were gone years prior. "And I started doing some, asking some questions. Terdema Ussery was hired before I got here, and the assertions you made were news to me. I talked to our HR person and again after these came up. And I was told there had been no complaints since I bought the team or even prior to that. None. And based off of what Iā€™ve read here, um, we just fired our HR person. I donā€™t have any tolerance for what Iā€™ve readā€¦ I feel sick to my stomach.ā€ "I want to deal with this this issue. I mean, this is, I obviously thereā€™s a problem in the Mavericks organization and weā€™ve got to fix it. Thatā€™s it. And weā€™re going to take every step. Itā€™s not something we tolerate. I donā€™t want it. Itā€™s not something thatā€™s acceptable. Iā€™m embarrassed, to be honest with you, that it happened under my ownership, and it needs to be fixed. Period. End of story.ā€ "It was bad, but we made a mistake about the whole thing and didn't pursue what happened with the police after the fact," Cuban told ESPN, referring to the first of two incidents. "I want to be clear, I'm not putting the blame on anybody else," Cuban said. "It came down to my final decision that I made."..."and because we didn't dig in with the details ā€“ and obviously it was a horrible mistake in hindsight" Contrast that with our illustrious owners day-after statements.
  24. Nope, wrong, you have a history of supporting the abuser. You dont care about facts and truth and have shown that for some time. Hes right, this has been a long pattern with you, and a disturbing one. You have what is obvious right in front of you, but you gleefully choose to put forth that dozens and dozens and dozens of women cant be trusted, because its their word against a few high ranking people in authority who would be severely hurt by anything coming out.
×
×
  • Create New...