x96bryan10 Posted January 5, 2010 Share Posted January 5, 2010 http://twitter.com/NFLRumorCentral It's a long shot, but a rumor making the rounds says the #49ers are looking to trade both first round picks http://bit.ly/8D0456 #nfl #draft Says in title looking to trade up to # 3 ... Sorry i dont have insider so i can't post the rest. But wouldnt it be sweet if somehow the skins came away with pick 13 and 16 ...anyone know how they value out on the draft day chart. Edit**#4 value 1800 #13 value 1150 #17 value 950 If we could somehow make this deal go down maybe by thorwing in our 4th rounder or an aging star we play on maybe releasing i.e. MOss POrtis we could do alot towards rebuilding our o-line injust 1 year Anyone who could post the rest of this article it would be much appreciated Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
squatch66 Posted January 5, 2010 Share Posted January 5, 2010 i doubt we get both firsts unless there is a guy that san fran really wants. more than likely we get 13 and a second or third. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
benskins26 Posted January 5, 2010 Share Posted January 5, 2010 i doubt we get both firsts unless there is a guy that san fran really wants. more than likely we get 13 and a second or third. To drop back from the 4th overall pick, I want more than the 13th and a possible third. I would AT MINIMUM want a high second. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Seabee1973 Posted January 5, 2010 Share Posted January 5, 2010 i would do thier 2 first rounders and a third Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Oldskool Posted January 5, 2010 Share Posted January 5, 2010 SF has the 13th and the 17th #1 St. Louis (1-15) #2 Detroit (2-14) #3 Tampa Bay (3-13) #4 Washington (4-12) #5 Kansas City (4-12) #6 Seattle (5-11) #7 Cleveland (5-11) #8 Oakland (5-11) #9 Buffalo (6-10) #10 Jacksonville^ (7-9) #11 Denver - from Chicago^ (7-9) #12 Miami (7-9) #13 San Francisco (8-8) #14 Seattle - from Denver (8-8) #15 New York Giants (8-8) #16 Tennessee^ (8-8) #17 San Francisco - from Carolina^ (8-8) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
grego Posted January 5, 2010 Share Posted January 5, 2010 To drop back from the 4th overall pick, I want more than the 13th and a possible third. I would AT MINIMUM want a high second. true. dont have the chart in front of me, but the 2 first rounders isnt that far off. #4 is a helluva pick. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
x96bryan10 Posted January 5, 2010 Author Share Posted January 5, 2010 To drop back from the 4th overall pick, I want more than the 13th and a possible third. I would AT MINIMUM want a high second. even value would be pick 13 and sumwhere in between picks 24 and 25 in the 1st round so yes we would deff want more than just a 3rd rounder back.....Maybe their 2nd and 3rd Sorry about that the site i checked said tied at 16 with another tea. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
benskins26 Posted January 5, 2010 Share Posted January 5, 2010 i would do thier 2 first rounders and a third that's a king's ransom. Although you do amazingly see draft day trades like this every year, and wonder what it would be like to have a competent FO. Could this be our year we rip someone off? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SittingBull Posted January 5, 2010 Share Posted January 5, 2010 Who are they coveting at the 3rd spot? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boofMcboof Posted January 5, 2010 Share Posted January 5, 2010 ESPN knows that fans of Top 10 drafting teams generally love trade down scenarios. This article is just making stuff up for the clicks. Unless S.F. has fallen head over heels for Bradford or Clausen this early in the process, this article is pure B.S. :bsflag: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
benskins26 Posted January 5, 2010 Share Posted January 5, 2010 even value would be pick 13 and sumwhere in between picks 24 and 25 in the 1st round so yes we would deff want more than just a 3rd rounder back.....Maybe their 2nd and 3rd I would take their 1st, 2nd, and 3rd, and maybe a 2nd or 3rd next season. EDIT: They would really need to like a guy a whole lot to give up all that Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mistertim Posted January 5, 2010 Share Posted January 5, 2010 If Suh is there you take the two 1st rounders. Period. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Redskinzfan30 Posted January 5, 2010 Share Posted January 5, 2010 Who are they coveting at the 3rd spot? Berry or Okung. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
benskins26 Posted January 5, 2010 Share Posted January 5, 2010 ESPN knows that fans of Top 10 drafting teams generally love trade down scenarios. This article is just making stuff up for the clicks. Unless S.F. has fallen head over heels for Bradford or Clausen this early in the process, this article is pure B.S.:bsflag: Very astute observation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
benskins26 Posted January 5, 2010 Share Posted January 5, 2010 Berry or Okung. I'll bet it's Berry Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Soup Posted January 5, 2010 Share Posted January 5, 2010 SuH and Okung are the only players that are worth a top 5 pick, if either of them are gone by then, this would the perfect move to make. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GibbsFactor Posted January 5, 2010 Share Posted January 5, 2010 Mike wants Tebow. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mistertim Posted January 5, 2010 Share Posted January 5, 2010 SuH and Okung are the only players that are worth a top 5 pick, if either of them are gone by then, this would the perfect move to make. I would take Okung in the top 5. Anyone besides Suh would be a reach. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SkinsHokieFan Posted January 5, 2010 Share Posted January 5, 2010 SF wants to draft their QB of the future in this draft while Alex Smith is a "stop gap" with their O They want Clausen or Bradford Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dirtyy Dirtyy #Thirtyy Posted January 5, 2010 Share Posted January 5, 2010 Well the Jets moved up from 17 to get 5 last year by throwing in their 2nd rounder, elam,kenyon coleman, and ratliff. I'd like to hope we'd be able to pull off a better deal though with the 4 spot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
x96bryan10 Posted January 5, 2010 Author Share Posted January 5, 2010 Well the Jets moved up from 17 to get 5 last year by throwing in their 2nd rounder, elam,kenyon coleman, and ratliff. I'd like to hope we'd be able to pull off a better deal though with the 4 spot. Yeah but Mangini also knew and coached those players and put a higher value on them more than any other team would have. I Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GibbsFactor Posted January 5, 2010 Share Posted January 5, 2010 SF wants to draft their QB of the future in this draft while Alex Smith is a "stop gap" with their OThey want Clausen or Bradford Which is why they want to go #3. Unless of course STL decides to get a QB. ETA: So us being a trading partner is hard to consider since they are trying to beat us. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Sinister Posted January 5, 2010 Share Posted January 5, 2010 Brucie is going to be fielding a lot of calls on draft day, there is going to be a lot of "already set" teams that would be happy to sacrifice their first 2 or 3 picks to get a coveted player like Berry or Haden or McCoy. The top portion of this draft is going to be loaded with defensive players, who are always quicker to adjust at the next level than offensive players Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bat~man Posted January 5, 2010 Share Posted January 5, 2010 Interesting, hopefully something pops up where we could get a sweet deal for our pick. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
monsta Posted January 5, 2010 Share Posted January 5, 2010 I think this is bS. San Fran can get one of the top rated Qbs at 17. I would imagine they stand pat, take Dez Bryant at 13 and a Qb (McCOY) at 17. There offense has a chance to be sick with Gore, Davis,Crabtree and either bryant at 13 or waiting and getting Golden Tate at 17? yeah they should stand pat Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.