Larry Posted September 19, 2009 Share Posted September 19, 2009 BTW, I'd like to point some things out here, too. 1) Far as I've noticed, not one person has said that racism is dead in this thread. 2) Far as I've noticed, not one person has said that anybody who disagrees with Obama is a racist, either. What some people have said (as far as I can read them) is: There seems to be a lot more hatred directed at Obama than there was at Bush And one reason for the difference is racism. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SnyderShrugged Posted September 19, 2009 Share Posted September 19, 2009 BTW, I'd like to point some things out here, too. 1) Far as I've noticed, not one person has said that racism is dead in this thread. 2) Far as I've noticed, not one person has said that anybody who disagrees with Obama is a racist, either. What some people have said (as far as I can read them) is: There seems to be a lot more hatred directed at Obama than there was at Bush And one reason for the difference is racism. Pretty good summary! Though, the last people you mentioned are simply wrong:D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alexey Posted September 19, 2009 Share Posted September 19, 2009 Let's recap: Obama's blackness plays a role in the hate we are seeing. Obviously they would not be as upset if a white man had won. Are you saying that 47 mil voted for the other guy because Obama is black? People were calling me a racist when I didn't vote for Obama. Any time you disagree with Obama you are called a racist. I told you this was going to happen. You are saying that there is dissent because Obama is black. Jimmy Carter said that people who disagree with Obama are racists. Fox is labeled as a racist channel. I think an overwhelming portion of the intensely demonstrated animosity toward President Barack Obama is based on the fact that he is a black man, that he is African-American. It seems that some people are talking about hate and intensely demonstrated animosity, while some other people are hearing something else... :whoknows: For the record, the only non-obvious portion of Carter's quote is "overwhelming". He may or may not be right in that. He would be stating the obvious if he had said "some" instead of "overwhelming". It was certainly not productive for him to say that, and WH did the right thing by distancing themselves from it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baculus Posted September 19, 2009 Share Posted September 19, 2009 Man some of you libs done went into serious fearmongering mode :hysterical::cool2::saber: I think we still need to get past the "Obama is a secret Muslim-Nazi-terrorist-ACORN!-communist trying to destroy the USA" right-wing fear mongering. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
twa Posted September 19, 2009 Share Posted September 19, 2009 I think we still need to get past the "Obama is a secret Muslim-Nazi-terrorist-ACORN!-communist trying to destroy the USA" right-wing fear mongering. What do you mean secret?:evilg: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NavyDave Posted September 19, 2009 Share Posted September 19, 2009 In the last, say, 20 years, how many people have been killed by left-wing "political activists"? Do you want to include Latin America? Go back over 65 years and you can include the "Brown Shirts" too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Larry Posted September 19, 2009 Share Posted September 19, 2009 In the last, say, 20 years, how many people have been killed by left-wing "political activists"? Observing that I asked this question in post #12 in this thread. 200 posts later, probably half a dozen people have quoted my post. Not one of them has attempted to answer the question. Closest any have come to a response is "Well, if you change the definition of "people", change the definition of "left-wing", change the definition of "have been killed by", go back 70 years, and look at other continents . . . " Guess I've made my point. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Destino Posted September 19, 2009 Share Posted September 19, 2009 Do you want to include Latin America? Go back over 65 years and you can include the "Brown Shirts" too. And Pinochet, the original 9/11 mass murderer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
twa Posted September 19, 2009 Share Posted September 19, 2009 Guess I've made my point. Guess it's a good thing they have been out of power huh? I could go with Waco and Ruby Ridge ect( that'd be about 83 for starters ?) ,but they needed killing right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Special K Posted September 19, 2009 Share Posted September 19, 2009 OMG, I can't read past page 4. This is simply retarded...and I don't use that word lightly. The pissing contest here is ridiculous. People arguing, tit for tat, who's fringe is the most violent? I mean seriously, selective memory around here has reached idiotic proportions. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MEANDWARF Posted September 19, 2009 Share Posted September 19, 2009 I think we still need to get past the "Obama is a secret Muslim-Nazi-terrorist-ACORN!-communist trying to destroy the USA" right-wing fear mongering. Okay, vote him out in 2012! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MEANDWARF Posted September 19, 2009 Share Posted September 19, 2009 Was Nancy fighting back tears during the RNC convention when these young people were expressing themselves? Was Nancy holding back tears during the violent anti-war protest in San Francisco in March 2009? Was her chin quivering when an angry mob was about to storm the Pro-American, Pro-Israel side during this protest? Note the socialistworker.org Nancy is a freaking phoney! Wake -Up America! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IHOPSkins Posted September 19, 2009 Share Posted September 19, 2009 ......Was Nancy holding back tears during the violent anti-war protest in San Francisco........She was in Washington decrying the "Climate of Corruption"She was Outing the CIA She was targeting "Nazis" Leave her alone........she is working for the country (which one is not so obvious) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vicious Posted September 19, 2009 Share Posted September 19, 2009 She was Outing the CIA Now it makes sense. Nancy Pelosi is Dick Cheney. Where were the Republicans raging about that? A woman puts her life on the line to protect us. Then to discredit her husband in order to succeed in duping the public for the Iraq war, they out her. Awesome to the max. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vicious Posted September 19, 2009 Share Posted September 19, 2009 yum, dinner was excellent and some viscious for desert! LOLWhy would you post this after I posted... "never, not once said that racism is dead, only that the silly assertion that the protest is due to racism. You give way too much weight to talk show influence. " You have in no way been rational about the "command" ability of the talking heads nor of the scope of racism when speaking about outcry against Obama's policies. It appears that you actually keep saying the same thing, which really amounts to not saying anything at all thus far. Like another poster said. You believe exactly what you want to believe. It's not my fault you're blind to reality. It's a common occurrence among the followers of "Conservatism" who sweat Reagan's balls. If a dose of reality hit them, their head would explode. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SnyderShrugged Posted September 19, 2009 Share Posted September 19, 2009 Like another poster said. You believe exactly what you want to believe. It's not my fault you're blind to reality. It's a common occurrence among the followers of "Conservatism" who sweat Reagan's balls. If a dose of reality hit them, their head would explode. It's interesting that you chose to believe in things that arent happenning over the reality that is. There is no increase in violence, yet you fear that it is increasing. It appears that you sir, are the one who is "blind to reality" Not sure why you would put conservatism in quotes when speaking to me. What is your purpose in doing that? Also, in terms of Reagan, do you somehow think that I am one of those who believes that he made no mistakes? If so, you are sadly mistaken as to what my views on government are. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vicious Posted September 19, 2009 Share Posted September 19, 2009 It's interesting that you chose to believe in things that arent happenning over the reality that is.There is no increase in violence, yet you fear that it is increasing. It appears that you sir, are the one who is "blind to reality" Not sure why you would put conservatism in quotes when speaking to me. What is your purpose in doing that? Also, in terms of Reagan, do you somehow think that I am one of those who believes that he made no mistakes? If so, you are sadly mistaken as to what my views on government are. I'm sorry, when was the last time Liberals exploded buildings? edit: That same rhetoric that causes those things to happen is getting crammed into the heads of millions of people thanks to cable television and the internet. There's is GREAT fear of Obama. GREAT fear. If you don't want to recognize that, I guess that's fine. The Secret Service has recognized it, and even gave us statistics. If you want to ignore the statistics, the evidence, then we're pretty much done here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SnyderShrugged Posted September 19, 2009 Share Posted September 19, 2009 I'm sorry, when was the last time Liberals exploded buildings?edit: That same rhetoric that causes those things to happen is getting crammed into the heads of millions of people thanks to cable television and the internet. There's is GREAT fear of Obama. GREAT fear. If you don't want to recognize that, I guess that's fine. The Secret Service has recognized it, and even gave us statistics. If you want to ignore the statistics, the evidence, then we're pretty much done here. Oh, did some conservtaive explode something recently? (Oh lord, please dont tell me you are trying to bring this thread back to the McVeigh thing again, are you?) No, the secret service has not given data. One man, who wrote a book that was in the secret service made that statement. And even though he did, we just saw many 10's of thousands of angry people rally and protest, without one single incident. You can "fear" all you like, I'll base my views on actual observation and reality. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vicious Posted September 19, 2009 Share Posted September 19, 2009 Like I said before, I would love to live in your Utopia free of racist hate towards our president, free of talking head influence and now free of violence. It sounds like a great place to live. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Larry Posted September 19, 2009 Share Posted September 19, 2009 And even though he did, we just saw many 10's of thousands of angry people rally and protest, without one single incident. You can "fear" all you like, I'll base my views on actual observation and reality. Or you can point (dozens of times) to a single event in which nothing happened and claim that this proves that nothing is happening, anywhere. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SnyderShrugged Posted September 19, 2009 Share Posted September 19, 2009 Like I said before, I would love to live in your Utopia free of racist hate towards our president, free of talking head influence and now free of violence. It sounds like a great place to live. Please show me all 3, right now, with links. Any mainstream racist hatred from those who are against President Obama's policies. Recall that just yesterday the President himself disagreed with you. http://www.voanews.com/english/2009-09-19-voa12.cfm What "influence" is coming from the so called "talking heads" that is any different from prior administrations? Please link with precision to specific large scale actions that have been inspired by these entertainers. For the umpteenth time, please show this "violence" that you claim is present as a response to the President's race or even his policies. If you cant do all 3, I'd suggest you clam up and stop embarrassing yourself over and over in this thread. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SnyderShrugged Posted September 19, 2009 Share Posted September 19, 2009 Or you can point (dozens of times) to a single event in which nothing happened and claim that this proves that nothing is happening, anywhere. Or I can point to all events and show that nothing is happening so far. I chose the largest and most passionate event as the basis since it would be more likely to occur there than in smaller events, just by the numbers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vicious Posted September 19, 2009 Share Posted September 19, 2009 Please show me all 3, right now, with links.Any mainstream racist hatred from those who are against President Obama's policies. Recall that just yesterday the President himself disagreed with you. http://www.voanews.com/english/2009-09-19-voa12.cfm What "influence" is coming from the so called "talking heads" that is any different from prior administrations? Please link with precision to specific large scale actions that have been inspired by these entertainers. For the umpteenth time, please show this "violence" that you claim is present as a response to the President's race or even his policies. If you cant do all 3, I'd suggest you clam up and stop embarrassing yourself over and over in this thread. What's embarrassing is you'd ignore reality once more. The President at no point can come out and say "people bein racist towards me!" That's just not feasible, strike one to reality of Snydershrugged. Claiming that talking heads have not increased drastically in ratings and power since the Bush years. Strike two for reality of Snydershrugged. It's called political violence, it builds up in the form of rage. There have been fights at health care town halls, physical altercations, over HEALTH CARE. As well as plenty of screaming. Threats have been made against the President, etc. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/usa/barackobama/5967942/Barack-Obama-faces-30-death-threats-a-day-stretching-US-Secret-Service.html All right, strike 3 for Snydershrugged's reality. You're out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SnyderShrugged Posted September 19, 2009 Share Posted September 19, 2009 What's embarrassing is you'd ignore reality once more. The President at no point can come out and say "people bein racist towards me!" That's just not feasible, strike one to reality of Snydershrugged.Claiming that talking heads have not increased drastically in ratings and power since the Bush years. Strike two for reality of Snydershrugged. It's called political violence, it builds up in the form of rage. There have been fights at health care town halls, physical altercations, over HEALTH CARE. As well as plenty of screaming. Threats have been made against the President, etc. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/usa/barackobama/5967942/Barack-Obama-faces-30-death-threats-a-day-stretching-US-Secret-Service.html All right, strike 3 for Snydershrugged's reality. You're out. Noticed you never posted any of the specific links I asked for. I assumed as much. (no racism noted, even the president concedes this, no violent acts, no proof other than ratings that were already high of "talking head influence) You lose (even if you dont believe thats the case) I'll leave it up to the rest of the board to decide. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vicious Posted September 19, 2009 Share Posted September 19, 2009 Noticed you never posted any of the specific links I asked for. I assumed as much.You lose (even if you dont believe thats the case) I'll leave it up to the rest of the board to decide. I guess you really don't understand the impact of rhetoric. Maybe when you do, one day, you will understand why the entire talking head fire brand format is dangerous. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.