Jump to content
Washington Football Team Logo
Extremeskins
Forum Rules and Guidelines

A Dozen Current QBs Better Than Romo...

tr1

By tr1
in Around the NFL

Recommended Posts

Mr. Jones

Mr. Jones

Posted
Posted
Of the QBs left in the playoffs, Warner, Favre, and Manning are better than Romo sits to pee. Rivers is good but maybe a bit overrated. I want to see Brees win a big playoff game or 2.

But Romo sits to pee had a great year, for sure. Looks like he's really matured as a QB. I hope he choke soons, though! :)

So basically saying you think he's in discussion for the top 6 or so rather than top 12?

As I said before Romo sits to pee is the second highest rated passer of all time, and was top 4 fastest to throw 100 TDs as well as one of the winningest ever over the first 50 games of their career. He garners a lot of hate but he really is very very good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Big Blue Joe

Big Blue Joe

Posted
Posted
So basically saying you think he's in discussion for the top 6 or so rather than top 12?

As I said before Romo sits to pee is the second highest rated passer of all time, and was top 4 fastest to throw 100 TDs as well as one of the winningest ever over the first 50 games of their career. He garners a lot of hate but he really is very very good.

He's a... :puke:... good QB. Very very good would be a proven QB like Brett Favre. The regular season stats are meaningless. Few really good QB's got the opportunity to sit on the sidelines and learn the game for 3.5 seasons. Most of them started their first game in their first or second year. Romo sits to pee, on the other hand, was a seasoned vet by the time he got to play. His only competition with comparable experience are the few rare non-journeymen QB's who got a late start, like Kurt Warner. Oh yean, and QB's from earlier eras. It's for that same reason that Aaron Rodgers looks like a good bet to challenge most of Romo sits to pee's "fastest start" records.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
GreenRiggins

GreenRiggins

Posted
Posted
He's a... :puke:... good QB. Very very good would be a proven QB like Brett Favre. The regular season stats are meaningless. Few really good QB's got the opportunity to sit on the sidelines and learn the game for 3.5 seasons. Most of them started their first game in their first or second year. Romo sits to pee, on the other hand, was a seasoned vet by the time he got to play. His only competition with comparable experience are the few rare non-journeymen QB's who got a late start, like Kurt Warner. Oh yean, and QB's from earlier eras. It's for that same reason that Aaron Rodgers looks like a good bet to challenge most of Romo sits to pee's "fastest start" records.

Thats probably because he was a UFA....

Damn, I still can't beleive how lucky those suckers got :mad:

Link to comment
Share on other sites
TonyRomoProBowl

TonyRomoProBowl

Posted
Posted
He's a... :puke:... good QB. Very very good would be a proven QB like Brett Favre. The regular season stats are meaningless. Few really good QB's got the opportunity to sit on the sidelines and learn the game for 3.5 seasons. Most of them started their first game in their first or second year. Romo sits to pee, on the other hand, was a seasoned vet by the time he got to play. His only competition with comparable experience are the few rare non-journeymen QB's who got a late start, like Kurt Warner. Oh yean, and QB's from earlier eras. It's for that same reason that Aaron Rodgers looks like a good bet to challenge most of Romo sits to pee's "fastest start" records.

A. Rodgers is a beast....whats his playoff record? LMBO

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Big Blue Joe

Big Blue Joe

Posted
Posted
dude put up 422 yds and 4 TD and 45 points...shouldnt have been in OT to begin with however
I'm sure Warner thought the same thing. Neither side played defense. Both QB's benefitted from it. Rodgers just turned the ball over one time too many.
....if you wanna take him off the list of QB's better then Romo sits to pee, I wont argue.
Romo sits to pee finally managed to not choke away a playoff game. I would say that gives him the edge over Rodgers.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Chachie

Chachie

Posted
Posted

I'm no GB fan, but Aaron Rodgers did not choke on sunday. How does one "choke" when they bring a team back from that deficit and force overtime?

Also- the OT fumble should have been called back due to blatant facemask penalty on the part of the Arizona sacker.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
OWUeagleMD

OWUeagleMD

Posted
Posted
I'm no GB fan, but Aaron Rodgers did not choke on sunday. How does one "choke" when they bring a team back from that deficit and force overtime?

Also- the OT fumble should have been called back due to blatant facemask penalty on the part of the Arizona sacker.

Choke is one of those words that people are allowed to fling around with reckless abandon. It's like "socialist," "literally," and "real American" in that it can mean whatever a person wants it to mean at any given time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
dallasfan

dallasfan

Posted
Posted

IMO the Top 5 QBs are

1.) PManning

2.) TBrady (let's wait untill he has a full healthy offseason before we say he's done)

3.) BRothlisberger

4.) DBrees (subject to playoffs)

5.) PRivers

________________________________________________________________

After that in no particular order

TRomo, ARogers, Favre, EManning, McNabb, Warner, CPalmer

All in all, Tr1 insn't too far off from the dozen QBs better because imo 6-12 is very debatable (ofcourse more people took offense to Campbell being higher than Romo sits to pee). JMO, Romo sits to pee's not at the bottom of the list, even before this year, Rogers and Palmer had 0 playoff wins and Favre was retired.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Kapolani

Kapolani

Posted
Posted
He's a... :puke:... good QB. Very very good would be a proven QB like Brett Favre.

Curious, what has Favre done lately?

The regular season stats are meaningless. Few really good QB's got the opportunity to sit on the sidelines and learn the game for 3.5 seasons. Most of them started their first game in their first or second year. Romo sits to pee, on the other hand, was a seasoned vet by the time he got to play.

You do realize that your golden child Favre didn't start his first year, right?

His only competition with comparable experience are the few rare non-journeymen QB's who got a late start, like Kurt Warner. Oh yean, and QB's from earlier eras. It's for that same reason that Aaron Rodgers looks like a good bet to challenge most of Romo sits to pee's "fastest start" records.

You must not have played sports or been in combat. Sitting on the bench and playing on the practice squad isn't even close to real-time play.

You don't start learning to trust your instincts until the bullets are flying.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
puck

puck

Posted
Posted
I'm no GB fan, but Aaron Rodgers did not choke on sunday. How does one "choke" when they bring a team back from that deficit and force overtime?

Also- the OT fumble should have been called back due to blatant facemask penalty on the part of the Arizona sacker.

In 2006 Romo sits to pee mishandled the hold for the field goal and you guys said that is a choker job. Now Aaron Rodger fumbled the ball and lost the game. But he is not a choker ?

I see double standard here.:doh:

Link to comment
Share on other sites
tr1

tr1

Posted
  • Author
Posted
In 2006 Romo sits to pee mishandled the hold for the field goal and you guys said that is a choker job. Now Aaron Rodger fumbled the ball and lost the game. But he is not a choker ?

I see double standard here.:doh:

Um, there's a bit of a difference between a chip shot fg hold and actual play.

You do agree, don't you?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
bubba9497

bubba9497

Posted
Posted
In 2006 Romo sits to pee mishandled the hold for the field goal and you guys said that is a choker job. Now Aaron Rodger fumbled the ball and lost the game. But he is not a choker ?

I see double standard here.:doh:

Wait you mean Romo sits to pee was being hit by a 300+ DLman from behind and having his face masked jerked when he fumble the snap?

wow they are exactly the same :thumbsup:

:rolleyes:

Link to comment
Share on other sites
VA Cowboy fan

VA Cowboy fan

Posted
Posted
Wait you mean Romo sits to pee was being hit by a 300+ DLman from behind and having his face masked jerked when he fumble the snap?

wow they are exactly the same :thumbsup:

:rolleyes:

No one said they were exactly the same...but the out come of the game is the same......Based on what the QB did....Both Romo sits to pee and Rodgers cost their team a win.....Go read the Packers forum, you will find a few of their fans are saying the same thing.....Kind of dumb? sure it is because both Qb's played lights out for most of the game but bottom line it came down to crunch time and both Qb's could not get it done......Does it make either QB any worse....no it does not, but since Romo sits to pee is the Boys QB for certain Redskin fans it does....there is your double standard

Link to comment
Share on other sites
coolbeans

coolbeans

Posted
Posted

I find it funny that most people forget that the league instantly changed the rules on how kicking balls were handled during games because some minimum wage seahawk flunkie slipped a brand new non-rubbed down ball in for that play. Brand new balls from the factory have a protective coating that might as well be vegtable oil. Not many people would have handled that snap with that ball.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
tr1

tr1

Posted
  • Author
Posted
I find it funny that most people forget that the league instantly changed the rules on how kicking balls were handled during games because some minimum wage seahawk flunkie slipped a brand new non-rubbed down ball in for that play. Brand new balls from the factory have a protective coating that might as well be vegtable oil. Not many people would have handled that snap with that ball.

I thought his 'small hands' was the preferable excuse...

:rotflmao:

Link to comment
Share on other sites
tr1

tr1

Posted
  • Author
Posted
No one said they were exactly the same...but the out come of the game is the same......Based on what the QB did....Both Romo sits to pee and Rodgers cost their team a win.....Go read the Packers forum, you will find their fans are saying the same thing.....Kind of dumb? sure it is because both Qb's played lights out for most of the game but bottom line it came down to crunch time and both Qb's could not get it done......Does it make either QB any worse....no it does not, but since Romo sits to pee is the Boys QB for most Redskin fans it does....there is your double standard

How many times has Rodgers been to the playoffs?

There's your double standard.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Jumbo

Jumbo

Posted
Posted
Curious, what has Favre done lately?

You do realize that your golden child Favre didn't start his first year, right?

You must not have played sports or been in combat. Sitting on the bench and playing on the practice squad isn't even close to real-time play.

You don't start learning to trust your instincts until the bullets are flying.

Favre may be a jackass but any football fan could fairly claim his as a "golden child" among QBs. And next time, leave smarmy assumptions about a poster's personal life (like the crap below) out of your posts. :)

You must not have played sports or been in combat

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...