Poll: Do You Consider Offensive Or Defensive Line To Be "Sexy" Draft Picks?

[Califan007 The Constipated]

Just curious lol :cool:

*Edit: I'm talking in general, not just as it pertains to the Redskins. Or, if you want to use it in the context of the Skins, do you think it's a "Dan Snyder" sexy pick?

[StillUnknown]

when its a position of dire need, the sexiness increases

[B&G]

Given our need for one of the two, I would consider an OT or DE pick as hotter than a firecracker!

[Skins_TL]

who the hell would think that.unless they are so dominant in college (probably cuz of steroids most likely)

[PCS]

Heh. Didn't see this coming at all.

[Oldskool]

When it's a position that we are in dire need of, regardless of position its sexy.

[kingjames]

Very sexy!

[Probos]

when its a position of dire need, the sexiness increases

This^^^

[Califan007 The Constipated]

Re-read the opening post, people lol...guess I had to make myself a bit clearer.

[Dah-Dee]

[usapatriot]

Not sexy. But if you need it you gotta get it. After all how many waste management workers are sexy. But you better have em or your in a load of...

[Veretax]

Defensive End is, DT is not. Guard, Center, and Tackle are not.

[Califan007 The Constipated]

who the hell would think that.unless they are so dominant in college (probably cuz of steroids most likely)

I think people are misunderstanding what I was asking lol...some of the posts seem to be along the lines of "Since it's an area of need and I really hope we draft a lineman, I would consider it sexy."

That's not quite what I meant, though...Ah, well, will still be interesting to see what everyone says. :thumbsup:

[Shilsu]

All this over another stupid battle of semantics. Clap clap clap.

[Califan007 The Constipated]

All this over another stupid battle of semantics. Clap clap clap.

Did you vote? :cool:

[Shilsu]

Did you vote? :cool:

I voted yes, but I do find it funny that due to the results not going the way you expected, you are now trying to sway the vote by re-editing your original post and also within the thread. Looks like you failed already.

[SIXX99]

I think that a DE can be a sexy pick if it is an explosive player. O-line is never sexy.

[CPortJGibbs89]

Defensive End is, DT is not. Guard, Center, and Tackle are not.

That is what I was thinking.

[Brandon Lloyd Christmas]

i said yes because i think DEs and DTs are, but oline is not.

[Califan007 The Constipated]

I voted yes, but I do find it funny that due to the results not going the way you expected, you are now trying to sway the vote by re-editing your original post and also within the thread. Looks like you failed already.

I haven't even checked the poll results. Nor have I voted.

And it became obvious that people were deeming what they wanted the Skins to do as "sexy", which was NOT at all how I meant it. So I clarified what I was meaning, because believe it or not I wanted opinions on the question I was asking lol....which was basically: if the Colts move up 4 spots to pick an O-lineman, would you consider that to be them drafting a "sexy" pick...or if the Ravens did it, would you...do you, in general, consider positions on the O-line and D-line to be "sexy" draft picks and sexy positions...do you think Snyder considers O-line and D-line to be "sexy" picks...do you think the media is referring to the O-line and the D-line to be "sexy" picks when they talk about sexy draft picks...

And, yes, all of that was for your benefit only, because I've come to learn you need that much explanation to catch up to the rest of us.

[Califan007 The Constipated]

i said yes because i think DEs and DTs are, but oline is not.

I think DE's can be, but you think DTs are?...I mean, outside of the rare freak of nature DT, that is...

[That Redskins Fan]

When it's a position that we are in dire need of, regardless of position its sexy.

ding ding

[Shilsu]

I haven't even checked the poll results. Nor have I voted.

And it became obvious that people were deeming what they wanted the Skins to do as "sexy", which was NOT at all how I meant it. So I clarified what I was meaning, because believe it or not I wanted opinions on the question I was asking lol....which was basically: if the Colts move up 4 spots to pick an O-lineman, would you consider that to be them drafting a "sexy" pick...or if the Ravens did it, would you...do you, in general, consider positions on the O-line and D-line to be "sexy" draft picks and sexy positions...do you think Snyder considers O-line and D-line to be "sexy" picks...do you think the media is referring to the O-line and the D-line to be "sexy" picks when they talk about sexy draft picks...

And, yes, all of that was for your benefit only, because I've come to learn you need that much explanation to catch up to the rest of us.

Thanks, but you should be more worried about yourself. In every interaction you and I have had, you are the one that consistently comes out looking like the fool whether it be you being reduced to babbling about Heath Shuler being statistically better than JaMarcus Russell, Todd Pinkston being a great WR with or without TO, or most mindboggling of all when you quoted yourself and started calling yourself names.

So for future reference, please spare any condescending talk .

[Jimbo]

Not sexy but necessary.

[Califan007 The Constipated]

When it's a position that we are in dire need of, regardless of position its sexy.

So when you think of "sexy" draft pick--not as it pertains to any one team during any one year, but just overall--you don't think of position at all? QB is no more a "sexy" draft pick or position than, say, long snapper?