Braxford Posted March 2, 2009 Share Posted March 2, 2009 Who do you think the Skins should resign Evans or Daniels? I would go with Evans and cut Daniels though I like him a lot. Evans is younger and I think could be a good player for the Skins for the next several years. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RammsteinSkins Posted March 2, 2009 Share Posted March 2, 2009 Tough decision. Evans would cost more so I go with Big Phil. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AngloSackSon Posted March 2, 2009 Share Posted March 2, 2009 It's likely Demetric will get an offer the 'Skins won't match. Daniels will be a soild depth/rotational player. He'll play early downs, and possibly next to Fat Al on the inside at times... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HitStickTaylor21 Posted March 2, 2009 Share Posted March 2, 2009 I used to want Evans, but he says he wants to be a starter (with starter money). He just fired his agent and signed with Drew Rosenhaus, so you know he's looking to get paid. I think Evans is overvaluing himself and would get more than he should from the Skins. Therefore, bring back Daniels for another year, and look to draft someone in 2010. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. S Posted March 2, 2009 Share Posted March 2, 2009 NEITHER!!! Daniels is old, maybe if we really need the help due to injuries during the season (meaning I hope we won't), then Daniels could be signed. Evans will be 30 when the season starts, and has shown he doesn't have much to offer aside from being solid depth. How about instead we develop our own depth, and that they are preferrably under the age of 26? Lets try to give Rob Jackson and Chris Wilson some time, as well as maybe draft another guy during any round of the draft? Or, pick up some other DE that has shown some promise, and see if they can work in our scheme. It's the same with people wanting to re-sign Kendall as depth on the o-line. At this point, it's smarter to sign younger guys who you can develop, instead of older guys who will always be regressing. For that reason, I wouldn't mind seeing Fabini go as well (if he isn't already a free agent, I think he's still under contract). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Oldskool Posted March 2, 2009 Share Posted March 2, 2009 My choices are a between a 35 year old DE who's best years are 4 years behind him and a undersized DT mascaraing as a DE? Where's option 3? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SKINchiefer Posted March 2, 2009 Share Posted March 2, 2009 I would say Evans, but since he only appears to want to get paid, then danials, BUT when it comes to stocking up with younger talent, like Mf.S said, Neither! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JeepRyder Posted March 2, 2009 Share Posted March 2, 2009 Uncle Phil! He's a good leader and everybody on the team seems to look up to him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DieselPwr44 Posted March 2, 2009 Share Posted March 2, 2009 My choices are a between a 35 year old DE who's best years are 4 years behind him and a undersized DT mascaraing as a DE?Where's option 3? Rob Jackson :doh: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gregpeck99 Posted March 2, 2009 Share Posted March 2, 2009 Poor Demetric ... they exappropriated his number to keep Big Fat Al happy ... he's history. Daniels will fail his physical and get an injury settlement. Skins need a DE badly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maskedsuperstar Posted March 2, 2009 Share Posted March 2, 2009 Poor Demetric ... they exappropriated his number to keep Big Fat Al happy ... he's history. Daniels will fail his physical and get an injury settlement. Skins need a DE badly. They will probably draft a DE. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zguy28 Posted March 2, 2009 Share Posted March 2, 2009 I would go with Daniels. If he is healthy, he is still a good run stopper. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skinsfor4 Posted March 2, 2009 Share Posted March 2, 2009 My choices are a between a 35 year old DE who's best years are 4 years behind him and a undersized DT mascaraing as a DE?Where's option 3? Wistrom if hes still around maybe?:laugh: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darth Tater Posted March 2, 2009 Share Posted March 2, 2009 NEITHER!!!Daniels is old, maybe if we really need the help due to injuries during the season (meaning I hope we won't), then Daniels could be signed. Evans will be 30 when the season starts, and has shown he doesn't have much to offer aside from being solid depth. How about instead we develop our own depth, and that they are preferrably under the age of 26? Lets try to give Rob Jackson and Chris Wilson some time, as well as maybe draft another guy during any round of the draft? Or, pick up some other DE that has shown some promise, and see if they can work in our scheme. It's the same with people wanting to re-sign Kendall as depth on the o-line. At this point, it's smarter to sign younger guys who you can develop, instead of older guys who will always be regressing. For that reason, I wouldn't mind seeing Fabini go as well (if he isn't already a free agent, I think he's still under contract). At the moment, before we consider the draft, injuries, moving personnel around and competition, our first four d-ends are Carter, Taylor, Wilson and Jackson and our first four d-tackles are Haynesworth, Griffin, Montgomery and Golston. At the d-line level, we probably keep 9 on the final 53, so (again before we consider injury etc.), the question is do we keep Alexander or a fifth DE. Evans or Daniels would likely take away a roster spot from somebody like Jackson, Alexander or Wilson. Of course, if Taylor is moved (either to SAM or off the squad), a roster spot may be open unless we go for a rookie DE (not moved to SAM) in round 1. If we move Taylor and don't replace him, we'll need to sign one of the two. You hope one or both stay out there until after the draft when you can sign one cheap based on who you ended up drafting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pjfootballer Posted March 2, 2009 Share Posted March 2, 2009 Evans- he's younger and healthier. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
twobags95 Posted March 2, 2009 Share Posted March 2, 2009 Evans wants paid as a starter and Daniels will be a angry man this year. So I pick Daniels. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LoveDaSkins172645 Posted March 2, 2009 Share Posted March 2, 2009 Neither, Evans plays in flashes and never has been consistent. Daniels is old plus the injury he sustained last year is serious. I believe that he should have never tried to become some iron pumping nut, he should have focused on football and not lifting 50 tons, but hey that's my opinion. The only way I would have either of them back is on vet minimum contracts with a few bonuses added. Sorry Daniels is way past his prime and seemed always injured and Evans was and will always be a rotational player at best. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
paloffs Posted March 2, 2009 Share Posted March 2, 2009 They will probably draft a DE. :hysterical: When do we EVER draft a DE that's expected to contribute? Jackson (what, a 7th rounder?) was our first DE drafted in a whiiiiiile. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Laxpunk2006 Posted March 2, 2009 Share Posted March 2, 2009 How about instead we develop our own depth, and that they are preferrably under the age of 26? Lets try to give Rob Jackson and Chris Wilson some time, as well as maybe draft another guy during any round of the draft? Or, pick up some other DE that has shown some promise, and see if they can work in our scheme. While I understand what you mean, we did develop Demetric Evans. He had a stint with the Cowboys but he was still young when we picked him up and we developed him into what he is today (whatever that may be). If this decision is strictly about youth, we already have that in Wilson and Jackson. It's very possible we could be picking up another DE in the draft depending on how the cards fall. As far as Daniels/Evans vs. Wilson/Jackson/New guy unless the new guy is a big boy, it's a completely different position. Jackson has a little bulk to him but the point of Daniels/Evans would be to get another run stuffer on the line. Carter-Griff-Haynesworth-Taylor looks great on third down, but not so great when we're backed up against our own endzone. He doesn't really have the height for it, but what about trying Alexander at LE on obvious running downs. He's been that sort of jack of all trades master of none so I don't see a reason why he couldn't hold down that spot. Marques Douglas could be another option. He isn't young at 31 and has bounced back between 3-4 and 4-3 schemes but he has great size (6-2 290) for LE. Running at Carter/Griff/Haynes/Douglas would be like running into a brick wall. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theMEAST21 Posted March 2, 2009 Share Posted March 2, 2009 Daniels is a free agent, we voided the last 2 years of his contract so we can't save any money by letting him leave. he said he'd be happy to come back and be a role player, demetric demands to be a starter and while he was arguably our best lineman last year, giving him what he wants to keep him around isn't in our best interest. PD could give some run support while haynesworth catches his breath, i think we should give the man the veteran min and be happy we have a solid veteran backup who wants to be here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skinzwiz Posted March 2, 2009 Share Posted March 2, 2009 Who do you think the Skins should resign Evans or Daniels? I would go with Evans and cut Daniels though I like him a lot. Evans is younger and I think could be a good player for the Skins for the next several years.Neither. Daniels is ineffective and Evans has lost his mind demanding a starting position w/o having starting talent. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Laxpunk2006 Posted March 2, 2009 Share Posted March 2, 2009 Daniels is a free agent, we voided the last 2 years of his contract so we can't save any money by letting him leave. he said he'd be happy to come back and be a role player, demetric demands to be a starter and while he was arguably our best lineman last year, giving him what he wants to keep him around isn't in our best interest. PD could give some run support while haynesworth catches his breath, i think we should give the man the veteran min and be happy we have a solid veteran backup who wants to be here. I haven't heard anything as far as Evans or Daniels taking any visits or offers from other teams. It's very possible that now that most of the big money is gone Evans could realize he has over valued himself and consider returning to split time at LE. I've been an Evans fan for a few years now but he's not a starter in this league and I believe he's learning that from his lack of FA interest. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
'SKINSRICH Posted March 2, 2009 Share Posted March 2, 2009 Evans- he's younger and healthier. And wasn't he also the most consistant D-lineman we had last season? He can also play inside or outside. He's also not coming off an injury. We've gotta start hanging onto guys who perform well for us, and quit letting them walk. But, what do I know..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MWCREDSKINS Posted March 2, 2009 Share Posted March 2, 2009 As much as I like Phil Daniels, Demetric is better for this team Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Santana_89 Posted March 2, 2009 Share Posted March 2, 2009 Daniels for just this year and next year draft someone young and hungry to prove himself. I know Demetric Evans has been valuable to this team,but not enough to be a starter or for starter money. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.