SUSkinsFan Posted October 10, 2008 Share Posted October 10, 2008 His "experience with healthcare as a patient" and the facial tumor reference in a later post.I took the healthcare quip as an age joke (but I can definitely see how someone else would take it as a cancer remark). And I must have missed the facial tumor remark. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheREALJBird Posted October 10, 2008 Share Posted October 10, 2008 Personally I don't favor either candidate. Whoever put that tag down there is pretty ****ed up Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mickalino Posted October 10, 2008 Share Posted October 10, 2008 How about, more appropriately, "Top 10 Reasons 'WVUforRedskins' should stop impersonating Letterman and keep his day job" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Major Harris Posted October 10, 2008 Share Posted October 10, 2008 Personally I don't favor either candidate. Whoever put that tag down there is pretty ****ed up ****ed up and a big puss to boot. tags need to be removed from the board, the anonymity of a screen name is enough. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mickalino Posted October 10, 2008 Share Posted October 10, 2008 Whoever put that tag down there is pretty ****ed up ****ed up and a big puss to boot. tags need to be removed from the board, the anonymity of a screen name is enough. I'll 3rd that. It's no longer about politics - it's about pure hatred and sick minds. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Larry Posted October 10, 2008 Share Posted October 10, 2008 Less than four weeks to go.Less than four weeks to go. You think that when the election's over, partisan sniping will stop? Start a thread about the 2000 election. See what happens. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SUSkinsFan Posted October 10, 2008 Share Posted October 10, 2008 you think that when the election's over, partisan sniping will stop? Start a thread about the 2000 election. See what happens. ****ING FLORIDA WAS STOLEN!!!!!l! I WANT A RECOUNT Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Larry Posted October 10, 2008 Share Posted October 10, 2008 (Those who think cancer is funny. Those who think being a POW is a big guffaw. Those who take Hussein Obama's lie and assign it to McCain, etc.) Those who think Obama's middle name is significant? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WVUforREDSKINS Posted October 10, 2008 Author Share Posted October 10, 2008 Geez, they were jokes. They were jokes making fun of his age and gov Palin. And I agree couple of them were redundant and lame. I have no idea about the tag. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HogNose Posted October 10, 2008 Share Posted October 10, 2008 Personally I don't favor either candidate. Whoever put that tag down there is pretty ****ed up I Agree, that tag below should be grounds for a long ES ban. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Teller Posted October 10, 2008 Share Posted October 10, 2008 I Agree, that tag below should be grounds for a long ES ban. Perma-ban me then. It was my tag, and it's FAR more accurate than most of the partisan-BS sniping (and personal-sniping) that's been done in tags before. As it was explained to me, tags are used to quickly jump to threads that discuss what is in the tag. In this case, WVU post made light of McCain's past health issues, and DIRECTLY MENTIONED his time as a POW in order to make a joke. What I posted is an accurate account of this thread. It uses cancer and captivity in an attempt to be funny. So do we ban me, for pointing that out? Or WVU for posting it in the first place? That's not my call. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rincewind Posted October 10, 2008 Share Posted October 10, 2008 Geez, they were jokes. They were jokes making fun of his age and gov Palin. And I agree couple of them were redundant and lame. I have no idea about the tag. The 'jokes' weren't funny... but the tags were, though probably not for the reason they were created. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mickalino Posted October 10, 2008 Share Posted October 10, 2008 Perma-ban me then. It was my tag, and it's FAR more accurate than most of the partisan-BS sniping (and personal-sniping) that's been done in tags before.As it was explained to me, tags are used to quickly jump to threads that discuss what is in the tag. In this case, WVU post made light of McCain's past health issues, and DIRECTLY MENTIONED his time as a POW in order to make a joke. What I posted is an accurate account of this thread. It uses cancer and captivity in an attempt to be funny. So do we ban me, for pointing that out? Or WVU for posting it in the first place? That's not my call. Thanks for explaining, h_h.......it all makes sense, now Your tags is fine by me - not so much because of who you are - but because of your true intentions there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WVUforREDSKINS Posted October 10, 2008 Author Share Posted October 10, 2008 Hog, you seem to be very overemotional in a lot of posts. Its almost as if I can see your bright red face as you punch away at your keyboard nearly every day. You always seem think you're a victim. Why? Its like you take a lot of things personally. You shouldn't. Like you have said over and over, no one ever finds a single post where you say people have accused you of saying certain things. If this thread offended you, I apologize. And i've edited out the two jokes that may have crossed the line. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Predicto Posted October 10, 2008 Share Posted October 10, 2008 But just like a PM I just received, several things have pushed me from throwing away a write-in to voting for McCain. And just like the person who PM'd me said, a BIG part of it is my DISGUST with some Obama supporters. heheh... I love ya H_H, but I knew this was coming. There was never even a remote chance that you were going to vote for anyone but McCain when the chips were down. A year's worth of angry, bitter, psychotic accusations and flat out lies by right wingnuts against Obama on this board never made any impression on you at all. But if there is any dig at McCain and here we go... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WVUforREDSKINS Posted October 10, 2008 Author Share Posted October 10, 2008 Does that mean that I'm required to cast aside any semblance of decency?Let's bring TLC in here. He's an Obama supporter. Let's see how funny he thinks even the POTENTIAL of having cancer is. But just like a PM I just received, several things have pushed me from throwing away a write-in to voting for McCain. And just like the person who PM'd me said, a BIG part of it is my DISGUST with some Obama supporters. (Those who think cancer is funny. Those who think being a POW is a big guffaw. Those who take Hussein Obama's lie and assign it to McCain, etc.) The joke said nothing about cancer at all. It was questioning the his health in his old age. Do you think I would put up a blatant joke about someone having cancer? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
USNationalist Posted October 10, 2008 Share Posted October 10, 2008 This is stupid. Reminds me of that one knuckle head that wrote that Romo sits to pee Diary thing in the stadium- insomuch as it is a disgraceful attempt at being funny. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Major Harris Posted October 10, 2008 Share Posted October 10, 2008 A year's worth of angry, bitter, psychotic accusations and flat out lies by right wingnuts against Obama on this board never made any impression on you at all. But if there is any dig at McCain and here we go... the same can be said for the other side, though, predicto. all that were outraged by the stupid obama threads are having a field day w/ dumb mccain threads. i guess you could do the old "he started it" routine here, but really..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Burgold Posted October 10, 2008 Share Posted October 10, 2008 OP missed the best and most obvious reason to vote for McCain. If you are lonely and depressed. My friend, you hav a friend in John McCain. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
outbaksean Posted October 10, 2008 Share Posted October 10, 2008 Here's a few non-joke reasons to vote for John McCain: Lower taxes, Nuclear power, and Foreign policy credentials Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TrumanB Posted October 10, 2008 Share Posted October 10, 2008 Another reason is McCain doesn't hang around terrorists. I kinda like that in my presidents. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Burgold Posted October 10, 2008 Share Posted October 10, 2008 Another reason is McCain doesn't hang around terrorists. I kinda like that in my presidents. Is that the reason that the Republicans never went after Bin Ladin Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TrumanB Posted October 10, 2008 Share Posted October 10, 2008 Is that the reason that the Republicans never went after Bin Ladin No, they went after him and are still going after him. Unless we nuked that region, it's kinda tough getting to a guy hiding in one of those mountainous caves. And I don't think Bush ever had coffee "chats" with Bin Laden like Obama did with Ayers. And I'm pretty sure Bush's campaign wasn't launched in Bin Laden's home, as was Obama's campaign in Ayer's home. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Burgold Posted October 10, 2008 Share Posted October 10, 2008 No, they went after him and are still going after him. Unless we nuked that region, it's kinda tough getting to a guy hiding in one of those mountainous caves.And I don't think Bush ever had coffee "chats" with Bin Laden like Obama did with Ayers. And I'm pretty sure Bush's campaign wasn't launched in Bin Laden's home, as was Obama's campaign in Ayer's home. Actually, the Bush's are very well known friends of the Bin Ladin family. They even made special provision for them to leave the country when all other flights were being canceled after 9/11. The connection to Bush and the Bin Ladins are much more intimate than Obama and Ayers. Mind you, it isn't true that Bush and Bin Ladin are buddies, but neither do the Ayers accusations resemble reality. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TrumanB Posted October 10, 2008 Share Posted October 10, 2008 Actually, the Bush's are very well known friends of the Bin Ladin family. They even made special provision for them to leave the country when all other flights were being canceled after 9/11. The connection to Bush and the Bin Ladins are much more intimate than Obama and Ayers.Mind you, it isn't true that Bush and Bin Ladin are buddies, but neither do the Ayers accusations resemble reality. Are you a 9/11 truther? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.