DRSmith Posted October 7, 2008 Share Posted October 7, 2008 Huh? The is on an going case in PA about Obama's birth certificate Obama and DNC have filed a stay of exucution on producing his birth certificate http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_R-l1iejogZw/SOqDdvvKgsI/AAAAAAAABCs/-fxtW2-XaUU/s1600-h/Lavelle+--+Motion+for+protective+order.bmp Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BRAVEONAWARPATH Posted October 7, 2008 Share Posted October 7, 2008 The is on an going case in PA about Obama's birth certificateObama and DNC have filed a stay of exucution on producing his birth certificate http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_R-l1iejogZw/SOqDdvvKgsI/AAAAAAAABCs/-fxtW2-XaUU/s1600-h/Lavelle+--+Motion+for+protective+order.bmp This is old news. This case was brought by a ardent Clinton Supporter. And Obama's birth certificate has already been produced. http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2008/born_in_the_usa.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Burgold Posted October 7, 2008 Share Posted October 7, 2008 The is on an going case in PA about Obama's birth certificateObama and DNC have filed a stay of exucution on producing his birth certificate http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_R-l1iejogZw/SOqDdvvKgsI/AAAAAAAABCs/-fxtW2-XaUU/s1600-h/Lavelle+--+Motion+for+protective+order.bmp You know that's going a bit far. When you are in denial that a man was even born. How could he be a Senator unless he was born? Wait a minute. There is one way. Do you think he was delivered unto this world through virgin birth? Born as a whole adult to save us? Are the Republicans challenging if Obama was born actually the ones who DO believe he's the Messiah? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baculus Posted October 7, 2008 Author Share Posted October 7, 2008 "tenuous" is what he trying to say, trying more and more to seperate himself, like he when he said that the rascist American hating Wright's caught on tape was not the Wright he knew. Obama certainly had to explain himself with both the Ayers and Wright connections. In fact, he has spoken on this subject multiple times. But here is the thing: Even at the time that Obama was connected to Ayers, Ayers himself was not actively a "terrorist." Meanwhile, McCain sat on the board of an organization that was funding a group known for death squads and terrorizing civilians. I can condemn both Ayers and Wright, because their actions ARE condemnable - even Obama has condemned both of them. Meanwhile, though, you seemingly do not have any issues with McCain's connections, because, perhaps in your eyes, condemning these connections would be condemning McCain himself. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baculus Posted October 7, 2008 Author Share Posted October 7, 2008 The is on an going case in PA about Obama's birth certificateObama and DNC have filed a stay of exucution on producing his birth certificate http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_R-l1iejogZw/SOqDdvvKgsI/AAAAAAAABCs/-fxtW2-XaUU/s1600-h/Lavelle+--+Motion+for+protective+order.bmp Why are you changing the subject? This is NOT about Obama and his birth certificate. It is about McCain and his ties to Iran-Contra and rather unsavory organizations. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DRSmith Posted October 7, 2008 Share Posted October 7, 2008 This is old news. This case was brought by a ardent Clinton Supporter.And Obama's birth certificate has already been produced. http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2008/born_in_the_usa.html Check the date on the link in the post to the court document, it was OCT 6 Seems to be a different case Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baculus Posted October 7, 2008 Author Share Posted October 7, 2008 Still support Paul and he is not a truther, just realistic. This subject has nothing to do with 9-11 or Truthers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baculus Posted October 7, 2008 Author Share Posted October 7, 2008 Check the date on the link in the post to the court document, it was OCT 6Seems to be a different case This is OT - please quit muddying the waters. I know you are just playing a distraction game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DRSmith Posted October 7, 2008 Share Posted October 7, 2008 Obama certainly had to explain himself with both the Ayers and Wright connections. In fact, he has spoken on this subject multiple times. But here is the thing: Even at the time that Obama was connected to Ayers, Ayers himself was not actively a "terrorist." Meanwhile, McCain sat on the board of an organization that was funding a group known for death squads and terrorizing civilians.I can condemn both Ayers and Wright, because their actions ARE condemnable - even Obama has condemned both of them. Meanwhile, though, you seemingly do not have any issues with McCain's connections, because, perhaps in your eyes, condemning these connections would be condemning McCain himself. Well lets see the Iran Contra people act stood trial for what they did. Has Ayers? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baculus Posted October 7, 2008 Author Share Posted October 7, 2008 My response was that of missed sarcasm, cause by my thinking you knew me better. Well, it is hard to judge people these days. Sorry. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BRAVEONAWARPATH Posted October 7, 2008 Share Posted October 7, 2008 Check the date on the link in the post to the court document, it was OCT 6Seems to be a different case No. It's the same case...same guy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Destino Posted October 7, 2008 Share Posted October 7, 2008 Always interesting to see an "independent" voter showing up in a thread and proceed to wave his arms and shout "ignore that look at THIS instead". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aREDSKIN Posted October 7, 2008 Share Posted October 7, 2008 And this assertion negates Obama's connections and denials to Ayers how? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DRSmith Posted October 7, 2008 Share Posted October 7, 2008 No. It's the same case...same guy. If it was settled then why is it on going still? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baculus Posted October 7, 2008 Author Share Posted October 7, 2008 Well lets see the Iran Contra people act stood trial for what they did.Has Ayers? It is the responsibility of the authorities to try and charge Ayers. Much of what we now know about Ayers became known after Ayers published a book, "Fugitive Days: A Memoir," in 2001. Ok, so what do we know about Ayers and Obama? Some details: They both served together on Woods Fund of Chicago board. Who else served on that board? * Howard J. Stanback - Board Chair - Manager, New Kenwood, LLC * Maria G. Valdez - Board Vice Chair - Attorney-at-Law, Mexican American Legal Defense and Education Fund * Cynthia M. Campbell - President, McCormick Theological Seminary * R. Eden Martin - President, Civic Committee and the Commercial Club * Charles N. Wheatley - President, Sahara Enterprises, Inc. Further details regarding the Ayers and Obama: *There was a coffee party for Obama at Ayers house, and Ayers contributed $200 to Obama's campaign. *The two also had an office luncheon on the subject of education reform. *Obama was also involved with the Chicago Annenberg Project board, an organization, Chicago's winning Annenberg Challenge, that involved Ayers as well as many other individuals and donators. This is a multi-million philanthropic foundation. The relationship between the two have been investigated by the "New York Times, The Washington Post, Time magazine, The Chicago Sun-Times, The New Yorker and The New Republic," according to the Wiki article on Ayers, and nothing untoward was found: No speeches that indicated a common affiliation for Ayers' Marxist views or supporting his position. That is what you and others do not get: There is ZERO evidence that, other then the educational efforts in Chicago, that Ayers or Obama share the same positions. Marxists believe in the complete destruction of Capitalism, and Obama has not demonstrated any such desire. Obama also has not voiced any opinion that also backs Ayers support for violent revolution. In fact, Marxists usually believe that Liberals such as Obama are part of the problem, since the free market and Capitalism are seen as part of the "liberal system" that they actively oppose. So where is Obama "palling around" with Ayers? Demonstrate to me any such evidence that the two were close friends and compatriots or demonstrate anything that backs up statements by the McCain campaign. Regarding Iran-Contra, a fair amount of involved people did not stand trial for their involvement. Case in point, George H. Bush, who many believe was directly involved with Iran-Contra. And much of the subject matter relating to Iran-Contra was covered up or ignored by the government, especially in particular relating to drug smuggling. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baculus Posted October 7, 2008 Author Share Posted October 7, 2008 And this assertion negates Obama's connections and denials to Ayers how? Read my previous post. Obama and Ayers are tied through Chicago-area educational organizations (that also had many other individuals involved). Oh, and a coffee party. This is totally different then McCain sitting on the board of an organization that has ties to terrorism, or receiving money from a man CONVICTED of supporting a group in South America that is a known terrorist group. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BRAVEONAWARPATH Posted October 7, 2008 Share Posted October 7, 2008 If it was settled then why is it on going still? I never said it was settled. I said it was old news. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Midnight Judges Posted October 7, 2008 Share Posted October 7, 2008 I would be interested to hear McCain, or Palin for that matter, speak extensively on the Iran contra affair and give their opinions. Perhaps this has already happened in McCain's case. But there are a lot of facets of this case that would offer insight to us voters as to what they would do in these types of situations. I really am curious: Would McCain trade arms for hostages? Would he fund and arm drug dealing thugs in the interest of fighting guys like Hugo Chavez? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dance04 Posted October 7, 2008 Share Posted October 7, 2008 I would be interested to hear McCain, or Palin for that matter, speak extensively on the Iran contra affair and give their opinions. I would really like to hear what Palin's opinion is on this. One that is of her own opinion, if she even has one on the subject. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Koolblue13 Posted October 7, 2008 Share Posted October 7, 2008 Always interesting to see an "independent" voter showing up in a thread and proceed to wave his arms and shout "ignore that look at THIS instead".No way that was aimed at me, right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BRAVEONAWARPATH Posted October 7, 2008 Share Posted October 7, 2008 No way that was aimed at me, right? It was aimed at DRSmith. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aREDSKIN Posted October 7, 2008 Share Posted October 7, 2008 Read my previous post.Obama and Ayers are tied through Chicago-area educational organizations (that also had many other individuals involved). Oh, and a coffee party. This is totally different then McCain sitting on the board of an organization that has ties to terrorism, or receiving money from a man CONVICTED of supporting a group in South America that is a known terrorist group. It is certainly more than that B. FYI Here you go- http://www.breitbart.tv/?p=190343 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baculus Posted October 7, 2008 Author Share Posted October 7, 2008 No way that was aimed at me, right? Naw, at DRSmith, I presume. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baculus Posted October 7, 2008 Author Share Posted October 7, 2008 It is certainly more than that B. FYIHere you go- http://www.breitbart.tv/?p=190343 Thanks for the link, but unfortunately I cannot watch a video at this time. Is there a text transcript I can watch, or can you give me some details on this report? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Midnight Judges Posted October 7, 2008 Share Posted October 7, 2008 I would really like to hear what Palin's opinion is on this. One that is of her own opinion, if she even has one on the subject. I don't think Palin would have an opinion on Iran contra. But seeing as how McCain was in congres and then the Senate during that period, and how closely he is linked to it, I would imagine he would have some opinions. I think it would be legitimate to ask McCain is he thinks the Reagan administration made mistakes, and what were those mistakes. Was this a proper use of the CIA? etc. It could make for a stimulating conversation and at the same time it would give McCain a chance to demonstrate his knowledge. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.