akorn22 Posted February 6, 2008 Share Posted February 6, 2008 Obviously Cqampbell is last. However if you go by the 07-08 season only, the ranking would be: Manning Romo sits to pee Collins McNabb Campbell Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stadium-Armory Posted February 6, 2008 Share Posted February 6, 2008 Clearly last. McNabb - Pro Bowler Romo sits to pee - Pro Bowl Manning - Super Bowl MVP Our guy - 8 systems in 9 years or whatever.. Lots of upside, but not there yet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CRobi21 Posted February 6, 2008 Share Posted February 6, 2008 here is a video of some other people talking about campbell. Good stuff :applause: :applause: :applause: awesome vid Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MikeBass Posted February 6, 2008 Share Posted February 6, 2008 seneca wallace blows. He plays WR and was terrible when he played in:doh: You're right, I do not think that Wallace is even being groomed to replace Hasselbeck when he retires...Wallace will be a career back up Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bigtme fan Posted February 6, 2008 Share Posted February 6, 2008 Ill take Romo sits to pee over Eli ALL DAY. And Ill take JC over both of them. If Asaunte Samuels would have caught that ball that hit him in the hands, what would people be saying about Eli then? He sucks, period. He is surrounded by beasts though, which makes up for his suckiness. You'd take JC over Romo sits to pee and Eli ALL DAY.... that is laughable! The other NFC East teams hope that JC stays around a long time. Here is the deal... 3rd game of the season, Giants are 0-2 and down by a two touchdowns at the half. They are on the verge of imploding, firing the coach, mutiny in the locker room, etc. But then lo and behold the Washington offense goes into meltdown mode in the 2nd half. The offense couldn't sniff a first down. JC was completely inept. As in so many games, when it came to crunch time JC folded like a cheap lawn chair. There was one entire possession that last 47 seconds (that's not too good). Even from the 1 yard line JC could not get a score - that was pathetic. I have no doubt collins could have (would have) won that game. So, every day the Giants should be sending roses to JC. He saved their season. They, like the other teams in the NFC East would love to see JC stick around for a long time. JC apologists, I'm sorry but it's true. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
apiah Posted February 6, 2008 Share Posted February 6, 2008 And I thought only ESPN flip flopped on their opinions. Wakey wakey people....the Giants DEFENSE won this game, though Eli's miracle throw was kinda nice also. A few games and a SB win doesn't take a guy from inconsistent to the greatest QB in the league. Choose a side of the fence and stay on it. 1. McNabb - Barring injuries, he's the best guy in the NFC East 2. Eli - Though he can thank Strahan, Tuck, and Osi....he showed mental toughness 3. JC - Our guy just has all the qualities necessary to be great. Zorn will bring it out. 4. Romo sits to pee - All I see is a guy who chokes when it matters. You got to be kidding me...like jason campbell can actually win when it matters:doh: ...even before the playoffs i would have ranked elli manning over jason campbell but i wud have just given campbell the edge since he was younger.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RocketCitySkins Posted February 6, 2008 Share Posted February 6, 2008 You'd take JC over Romo sits to pee and Eli ALL DAY.... that is laughable! The other NFC East teams hope that JC stays around a long time. Here is the deal... 3rd game of the season, Giants are 0-2 and down by a two touchdowns at the half. They are on the verge of imploding, firing the coach, mutiny in the locker room, etc. But then lo and behold the Washington offense goes into meltdown mode in the 2nd half. The offense couldn't sniff a first down. JC was completely inept. As in so many games, when it came to crunch time JC folded like a cheap lawn chair. There was one entire possession that last 47 seconds (that's not too good). Even from the 1 yard line JC could not get a score - that was pathetic. I have no doubt collins could have (would have) won that game. So, every day the Giants should be sending roses to JC. He saved their season. They, like the other teams in the NFC East would love to see JC stick around for a long time. JC apologists, I'm sorry but it's true. Giants 1 yd line 1st play - Jason spikes the ball to stop the clock 2nd play - Jason pass incomplete (okay I'll give you that one) 3rd play - running play to Betts for no gain (Bench called play, how did Jason fold on that one?) 4th play - running play to Betts lost 2 yds. (Again bench called play, and how did Jason fold?) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bigtme fan Posted February 6, 2008 Share Posted February 6, 2008 Giants 1 yd line1st play - Jason spikes the ball to stop the clock 2nd play - Jason pass incomplete (okay I'll give you that one) 3rd play - running play to Betts for no gain (Bench called play, how did Jason fold on that one?) 4th play - running play to Betts lost 2 yds. (Again bench called play, and how did Jason fold?) Do you think Campbell had a good game against the Giants? Yes or No? It's really kinda simple. Did he hve a good game against Tampa? Or how about Dallas. Those late interceptions were classic. We had 0 (zero with a Z) points against Chicago when Collins game in. Please! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MikeB Posted February 6, 2008 Share Posted February 6, 2008 It's simple. He ranks last, but with nice upside. After the 08 campaign he could easily move up in the shuffle, but you can't place him there now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
#21Taylor4Ever Posted February 6, 2008 Share Posted February 6, 2008 Fans need to give Jason some time. He hasn't even played 2 full seasons yet. Here are Jason's stats compared with other QB's around the same point in their careers.Jason Campbell's numbers through his first 19 games... Comp:350 Att:608 PCT:57.6 YARDS:3,897 TD:22 INT:17 SACKED:27 RAT:77.2 Drew Brees first year as a starter...he got much worse his 2nd year which I didn't show. COMP:320 ATT:526 PCT:60.8 YARDS:3,284 TD:17 INT:16 SCK:24 RAT:76.6 Tom Brady first year as a starter he played in 15 games. COMP:264 ATT:513 PCT:63.9 YARDS:2,843 TD:18 INT:12 SCK:41 RAT:86.5 Brett Farve's 1st year as a starter played 15 games. His 2nd year was worse with 19td's 24ints. COMP:302 ATT:471 PCT:64.1 YARDS:3,227 TDS:18 INTS:13 SCK:34 RAT:85.3 Peyton Manning's 1st year as a starter, started all 16 games. COMP:326 ATT:575 PCT:56.7 YARDS:3,739 TD:26 INT:28 SCK:22 RAT:71.2 As you can see Jason's numbers aren't that far off.Jason will face a setback this year starting over in a new offense. The guy does have talent people just need to let him develop. Fans give up on players and coaches way to fast. Its like people thought Campbell should have busted out throwing 30 TDs and 4000 yards and that just doesn't happen. THANK YOU!!!! I just hope those who hate JC, still hate him when he's won us 2-3 SBs. 20 starts and he already sucks? Gimme a break! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RocketCitySkins Posted February 6, 2008 Share Posted February 6, 2008 Do you think Campbell had a good game against the Giants? Yes or No? It's really kinda simple. Did he hve a good game against Tampa? Or how about Dallas. Those late interceptions were classic. We had 0 (zero with a Z) points against Chicago when Collins game in. Please! I was answering this one quote. "Even from the 1 yard line JC could not get a score - that was pathetic." You didn't mention Tampa or Dallas in the post that I replied to. I have almost all of every game saved. I am making it my mission to go through every one of them and post the results of every play that Jason had where he did more than just hand off the ball. And I will post the announcers comments in quotes so it won't be just my observations. I am not a homer to the point that I won't acknowledge Jason's faults and mistakes. But I don't like to see him blamed for things that went wrong that were beyond his control. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mcarey032 Posted February 6, 2008 Share Posted February 6, 2008 yeah he would be either three or four, but really mcnabb started to play well at the end of the year and jason got hurt. It is really hard to say that he is rated last, but I guess it is reality. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CliffBattles Posted February 6, 2008 Share Posted February 6, 2008 here is a video of some other people talking about campbell. Good stuff It really seems that Jason gets so much more praise from the national media guys (who often seem dismiss Skin's players) and even fans from other teams than Washington fans. I guess, it would mean either we are too critical, or we just observe more.....I hope it is the former. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheItalianStallion Posted February 6, 2008 Share Posted February 6, 2008 The Cowboys on ly gave up 3 LESS SACKS than the Redskins. OH MY! BIG DIFFERENCE.But hey! Don't let facts get in the way of propaganda. Romo sits to pee had MUCH more time to throw than JC. JC was running for his life half the time. Even when he completes a pass, a lot of the time he gets clobbered while throwing, or just gets the pass off. Sacks alone don't reflect the difference in the amount of protection between the two. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cphil006 Posted February 6, 2008 Share Posted February 6, 2008 Last. Period. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MikeBass Posted February 6, 2008 Share Posted February 6, 2008 It's simple. He ranks last, but with nice upside. After the 08 campaign he could easily move up in the shuffle, but you can't place him there now. Exactly!!! Regardless of how we feel about Campbell we all must concede that he has not arrived yet. He has shown, in games, that he can do some special things but he has also shown that he can lose games for us. It is about 50:50 right now as far as HIS mistakes that cost us game as opposed to others. Until he changes that ratio and becomes a true leader that can take control of his offense and finish the deal, he will be placed near the bottom of a lot of lists. At the same time, I do think that he can turn the corner and be the QB that we need to win Superbowls. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the burgundy and gold Posted February 6, 2008 Share Posted February 6, 2008 i don't know how theres even an arguement over this, he's clearly last. Anyone who puts him infront of Mcnabb needs to take the homer glasses off. IMO it's Romo sits to pee Eli Mcnabb JC Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PCS Posted February 6, 2008 Share Posted February 6, 2008 Right now, sitting last. Hopefully we can come back to this after next season with a higher ranking. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skinfan2k Posted February 6, 2008 Share Posted February 6, 2008 we do play in the best division in football IF he played in NFC north, hes 2nd NFC west, likely 2nd, leinart hasn't showed anything AFC east, 2nd behind brady Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ballin86 Posted February 6, 2008 Share Posted February 6, 2008 1. Eli (always has been even before the super bowl, Romo sits to pee is nothing without TO) 2. McNabb (done it for a long time with no true #1 WR other than TO and he made super bowl that year, Romo sits to pee still hasn't made it with TO) 3. Romo sits to pee (as i stated above, tako TO away and he is not that great) 4. JC (same place he was before the season, TC would rank #3 if he were the starting QB, Romo sits to pee would fall to 4) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dizzinator53 Posted February 6, 2008 Share Posted February 6, 2008 Eli got lucky... He is not that ****ing good. You guys are retarded.... You will jump on anyone's nuts in a second. He looked like **** in week 14 against us. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dusssti Posted February 6, 2008 Share Posted February 6, 2008 Campbell will be amazing. Trust me. All you Campbell Haters out there will be eating your words. after the 2008 season: 1. Jason 2. Romo sits to pee 3. Eli 4. Eagles QB (McNabb or otherwise) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
THE ONCELER1 Posted February 7, 2008 Share Posted February 7, 2008 Romo sits to pee had MUCH more time to throw than JC. JC was running for his life half the time. Even when he completes a pass, a lot of the time he gets clobbered while throwing, or just gets the pass off. Sacks alone don't reflect the difference in the amount of protection between the two. LOL!!! Whatever! Then how do you explain Todd Collins? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CRobi21 Posted February 7, 2008 Share Posted February 7, 2008 LOL!!! Whatever! Then how do you explain Todd Collins? Better O-line play. If it's not that, then Todd Collins has better scrambling ability than Campbell, which is definately false. So yea. Better o-line play. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
THE ONCELER1 Posted February 7, 2008 Share Posted February 7, 2008 we do play in the best division in footballIF he played in NFC north, hes 2nd Now he wouldn't. He might be third...MIGHT. I wouldn't put him ahead of Kitna. You guys like to make excuses as to how, "If Campbell had better Oline protection...blah blah blah." When you look at the Lions Oline... YOU HAVE NOT RIGHT TO COMPLAIN. And if Campbell was behind that Oline... his numbers are bad enough but... no. He wouldn't be second. NFC west, likely 2nd, leinart hasn't showed anything And Campbell has? Oh I know, Leinert's started more games than Campbell, but unlike Campbell he didn't get to sit an entire year and learn the game. He was thrown immediately into the fire. Isn't that an adantage that Campbell enjoyed? You guys seem to claim it as an advantage for Romo sits to pee. AFC east, 2nd behind brady No he wouldn't. I find it funny as to how Losman has a 76.9 QB rating---and it gets him replaced in Buffalo. Campbell is at 77 QB rating---and it's only going to get better, at least that's what you guys claim! LOL!!!:applause: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.