lilty1975 Posted September 9, 2007 Share Posted September 9, 2007 Fellas, This is just one game, take it easy on the kid. I think he made more good plays than bad plays. The 1st INT was his fault, but I give the 2nd INT to Brandon Loydd. Jason did what he was supposed to do put the ball in the air with the one on one coverage and have his reciever go get it. Did anybody notice after the INT Loydd was jogging not even trying to make the tackle. He has no heart and I hope in the filming room they see that and sign another reciever. It look like a good pass Loydd was in pretty good positon but the corner wanted it more. Also some people have been saying look at his stats, that if it wasn't for the hail mary at half time he would have had bad numbers, but think about the drop passes they had. With a little more touch on his passes he will be putting up big number, just wait and see. With all that said we our 1-0. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NewCliche21 Posted September 9, 2007 Share Posted September 9, 2007 Fellas, This is just one game, take it easy on the kid. I think he made more good plays than bad plays. The 1st INT was his fault, but I give the 2nd INT to Brandon Loydd. Jason did what he was supposed to do put the ball in the air with the one on one coverage and have his reciever go get it. Did anybody notice after the INT Loydd was jogging not even trying to make the tackle. He has no heart and I hope in the filming room they see that and sign another reciever. It look like a good pass Loydd was in pretty good positon but the corner wanted it more. Also some people have been saying look at his stats, that if it wasn't for the hail mary at half time he would have had bad numbers, but think about the drop passes they had. With a little more touch on his passes he will be putting up big number, just wait and see. With all that said we our 1-0. I'd like a paragraph break or two, but other than that you're pretty dead on. Don't forget about Campbell running for a couple of first downs and avoiding a few sacks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
z0eboy Posted September 9, 2007 Share Posted September 9, 2007 it was Moss in the endzone not Lloyd Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cober Posted September 9, 2007 Share Posted September 9, 2007 Both are on Campbell as he is QB but it happens to all QB he could had 3 int if deep ball had not been deflected. Still thats life sometimes a you throw the ball and receaver gets outplayed. What he needs to improve on is his short game. As seems it eather off target or receaver not catching them. Still Cambell while not playing well had some great moments. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NewBlood81 Posted September 9, 2007 Share Posted September 9, 2007 it was Moss in the endzone not Lloyd No it was Lloyd. If it was Moss Campbell would have 250 yards1int and 1 td Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lilty1975 Posted September 9, 2007 Author Share Posted September 9, 2007 you said it brother!!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bonez3 Posted September 9, 2007 Share Posted September 9, 2007 Fellas, This is just one game, take it easy on the kid. I think he made more good plays than bad plays. The 1st INT was his fault, but I give the 2nd INT to Brandon Loydd. Jason did what he was supposed to do put the ball in the air with the one on one coverage and have his reciever go get it. Did anybody notice after the INT Loydd was jogging not even trying to make the tackle. He has no heart and I hope in the filming room they see that and sign another reciever. It look like a good pass Loydd was in pretty good positon but the corner wanted it more. Also some people have been saying look at his stats, that if it wasn't for the hail mary at half time he would have had bad numbers, but think about the drop passes they had. With a little more touch on his passes he will be putting up big number, just wait and see. With all that said we our 1-0. Saved me a post, spot on analysis. With a couple more accurate balls and a couple of less drops next week and we roll for sure. PS- I think you may have had a a couple drinks judging by the grammer Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jeronimobrat Posted September 9, 2007 Share Posted September 9, 2007 No it was Lloyd. If it was Moss Campbell would have 250 yards1int and 1 td I'm glad you cleared it up for him because I was like "What game were you watching buddy, unless you of course you confused a short fella with Randy Moss of New England." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Touchdown Redskins Posted September 9, 2007 Share Posted September 9, 2007 I totally agree. As I said in another thread, this was his worst game as a professional, and he still threw for 220 yards despite three dropped passes. The first pick was all on him, but honestly those types of things happen to young and old QBs alike. The second one was on Lloyd, and I did not appreciate the effort he gave on the play. I think we all agree that we'd rather have JC throw a pick trying to throw a bomb into single coverage than see Brunell dink and dunk it to a 3 and out. In any case, JC was probably on edge, and he doesn't see 3-4 defenses very much anyway so he'll probably use this as a learning experience. If this is the worst he has to offer, then he's going to be special. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Taylor 36 Posted September 9, 2007 Share Posted September 9, 2007 The Redskins won today, not Campbell. Campbell was bailed out by his team mates. Now, I'm not giving up on the guy, but he needs to pick it up. I'm not sure if it was opening day jitters or what, but he did not look very good today, nor did Moss. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lilty1975 Posted September 9, 2007 Author Share Posted September 9, 2007 Saved me a post, spot on analysis.With a couple more accurate balls and a couple of less drops next week and we roll for sure. PS- I think you may have had a a couple drinks judging by the grammer I acutally haven't had anything to drink, I just have Fort Washington MD schooling(Friendly High). Next time I will get my wife to proofread my post :laugh: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
#1Redskins Posted September 9, 2007 Share Posted September 9, 2007 it was Moss in the endzone not Lloyd Were you watching the same game?!?!? The Redksins jersey number on the INT play in the endzone was #85..... Brandon Lloyd did nothing to try to stop the interception! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B&G Posted September 9, 2007 Share Posted September 9, 2007 Actually (and I hate to say this because I'm a huge Cooley fan), I thought Cooley could have done a lot more to catch that pass by putting his body between and ball and the defender. That's one thing Redskins receivers haven't done well in a long time and need to work on. I thought 85 played poorly today and, since we know he can jump, was disappointed in his lack of effort on the 2nd touchdown. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
z0eboy Posted September 9, 2007 Share Posted September 9, 2007 i saw the play again, you guys are right Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Drex Posted September 9, 2007 Share Posted September 9, 2007 Jason's a young qb who was starting his 8th game in the league. He is going to have his share of growing pains throughout the duration of the season and I hope the team and the fans remain patient as he learns to become a solid NFL qb. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thoth Posted September 9, 2007 Share Posted September 9, 2007 He showed GREAT touch on a number of deep balls. He showed pocket presence, and speed when running. Better decision making, and touch on short balls will come. As observed, better to have a QB that miffs a few short ones and can go long, than the opposite, which is what Brunell became as he aged. He could have played much better, but his mistakes were correctable ones, and he showed talent where it matters most. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
redskns21 Posted September 9, 2007 Share Posted September 9, 2007 PS- I think you may have had a a couple drinks judging by the grammer P.S. - I think you might not want to judge others when you're missing both spelling and punctuation skills . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alwrld Posted September 9, 2007 Share Posted September 9, 2007 Both are on Campbell as he is QB but it happens to all QB he could had 3 int if deep ball had not been deflected. Still thats life sometimes a you throw the ball and receaver gets outplayed.What he needs to improve on is his short game. As seems it eather off target or receaver not catching them. Still Cambell while not playing well had some great moments. Dude, Campbell is not off on the short game. The kid is 6-5ft... and he is throwing to a couple migits. and not all INTs are on the QB. Moss's short ass couldn't pull in a TD that any 6ft receiver would have had. And Cooley, who had an off game went short on his pattern instead of going to the ball and flatting his route across the middle. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Campbell's_da_man Posted September 10, 2007 Share Posted September 10, 2007 Okay fella's, Jason admitted that he came out a little over-excited, as it was his first season opener. I can buy that. And now it's out of the way. Brunell told him he would be excited starting in his first opener, but the rest will be just games, so he will get settled in. And don't forget this, it takes two years to learn this system, and he has only been in it for a season and a game so far, not two seasons yet. So I expect him to keep learning and maturing as this season goes. Then next year is the one when we will see him firing on all cylinders. So in the mean time, we need our defense to carry the offense a little bit, like in 2005. And hopefully by the second half of the season, the offense will start catching up to the defense, just in time to enter the playoffs!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sticksboi05 Posted September 10, 2007 Share Posted September 10, 2007 it was Moss in the endzone not Lloyd No......It was Lloyd. Moss dropped two passes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
#98QBKiller Posted September 10, 2007 Share Posted September 10, 2007 Fellas,This is just one game, take it easy on the kid. I think he made more good plays than bad plays. The 1st INT was his fault, but I give the 2nd INT to Brandon Loydd. Jason did what he was supposed to do put the ball in the air with the one on one coverage and have his reciever go get it. Did anybody notice after the INT Loydd was jogging not even trying to make the tackle. He has no heart and I hope in the filming room they see that and sign another reciever. It look like a good pass Loydd was in pretty good positon but the corner wanted it more. Also some people have been saying look at his stats, that if it wasn't for the hail mary at half time he would have had bad numbers, but think about the drop passes they had. With a little more touch on his passes he will be putting up big number, just wait and see. With all that said we our 1-0. You're right dude, Lloyd played like this was a backyard two-hand touch pickup game...he needs to get his heart into it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Philip Pease Posted September 10, 2007 Share Posted September 10, 2007 A win even when Jason did not have a great game shows just how good we might be this season. Probably the overthrows are the result of too much adrenalin; he just needs to settle down a little. The one INT was a bad decision as the receiver was covered; the other INT Lloyd should have broken it up at least. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
#1Redskins Posted September 10, 2007 Share Posted September 10, 2007 He showed GREAT touch on a number of deep balls. He showed pocket presence, and speed when running. Better decision making, and touch on short balls will come. As observed, better to have a QB that miffs a few short ones and can go long, than the opposite, which is what Brunell became as he aged. He could have played much better, but his mistakes were correctable ones, and he showed talent where it matters most. He sure did! Campbell did a great job on scrambling.... When his receivers weren't open and the pocket would collapse around him he'd take off for the 1st down or throw the ball away out of bounds. It shows guts that he trusted his offensive linemen after Jansen got injured. The only little problem I see with Campbell is that when he passes the ball 10 yards out, he tends to let it drift high in the air instead of hitting it straight ahead right on the numbers! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
REEGSKINS Posted September 10, 2007 Share Posted September 10, 2007 No......It was Lloyd. Moss dropped two passes. you know i wouldnt have been mad at moss about the drops if it wasnt for his selfish acts when jason doesnt throw him a great pass. he also did this last year and i hated it. it was the first game they played with each other and if jason wasnt so mature and poised he could have shook his confidence. look i know moss has done a lot for us, and i think he is great but i think someone should pull him aside and tell him his body language after a bad throw needs to stop. this team should watch ARE to learn how to act. if our team took on ARE's personality we would be great. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GOSKN5 Posted September 10, 2007 Share Posted September 10, 2007 I just love the fact that when the QB drops back now we dont have to assume a 5 yard dumpoff will be our best play....we have a QB not afraid to throw downfield and he does it well.... I think he will continue to develop and turn into a great QB for us... hopefully it happens soon.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.