Rebuttal to Kristol op-ed: Why Bush Is A Loser

[Vinnick]

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/07/17/AR2007071701456.html?nav=hcmodule

Why Bush Is A Loser

By David Corn

Tuesday, July 17, 2007; 7:45 PM

Who knew Bill Kristol had such a flair for satire?

How else to read his piece for Outlook on Sunday, in which he declared, "George W. Bush's presidency will probably be a successful one"? Surely Kristol, the No. 1 cheerleader for the Iraq war, was mocking himself (and his neoconservative pals) for having been so mistaken about so much. But just in case his article was meant to be a serious stab at commentary, let's review Kristol's record as a prognosticator.

On Sept. 18, 2002, he declared that a war in Iraq "could have terrifically good effects throughout the Middle East." A day later, he said Saddam Hussein was "past the finish line" in developing nuclear weapons. On Feb. 20, 2003, he said of Saddam: "He's got weapons of mass destruction.... Look, if we free the people of Iraq we will be respected in the Arab world." On March 1, 2003 -- 18 days before the invasion of Iraq -- Kristol dismissed the possibility of sectarian conflict afterward. He also said, "Very few wars in American history were prepared better or more thoroughly than this one by this president." He maintained that the war would cost $100 billion to $200 billion. (The running tab is now about half a trillion dollars.) On March 5, 2003, Kristol said, "We'll be vindicated when we discover the weapons of mass destruction."

After a performance like this -- and the above is only a partial review; for more details, click here -- Kristol, a likeable fellow, ought to have his pundit's license yanked. But he's back again with a sequel: W. will be seen as a wonderful president. His latest efforts should be laughed off op-ed pages. But in the commentariat, he's still taken seriously. So assuming the joke is indeed unintended, I'll examine Kristol's most recent fantasy as if it's real.

Iraq: Kristol says "we now seem to be on course to a successful outcome." The war has been a mess from the start, and these days even leading Republican senators no longer buy the argument that Bush's so-called "surge" is succeeding or can succeed as promised. Kristol contends that with the recent escalation "we are increasingly able to protect more of the Iraqi population." Many in Iraq would find little comfort in his assurances. Despite the "surge," Iraqi civilian deaths are still running at 2,500 to 3,000 a month. And since the "surge" began, according to the Pentagon's own numbers, the number of attacks on U.S. and Iraqi forces and Iraqi civilians has marginally increased.

Still, Kristol advises, stick with the "surge," train more Iraqi troops, and all will be well. The United States has already spent $19 billion training 346,500 or so Iraqi troops and police officers, and now merely six battalions -- down from 10, according to Gen. Peter Pace -- can function independently. That is, only 3,000 Iraqi troops are operating on their own after all this time and money.

Meanwhile, the Iraqi government is making little, if any, progress on key political matters that must be resolved, and the parliament is taking off August -- while American GIs continue to fight and die. What are they dying for? Kristol and Bush argue the war is a vital part of the battle against al Qaeda and international jihadism, and Kristol claims the U.S. military is "routing al Qaeda in Iraq." But, as the Los Angeles Times recently reported, of the 19,000 insurgents held by the U.S. military in Iraq, only 135 are foreigners. The United States is not fighting al Qaeda in Iraq; it's fighting Iraqis. Kristol is whistling past a graveyard -- filled with the bodies of thousands of American soldiers and probably hundreds of thousands of Iraqi civilians -- when he insists the United States is heading toward a "messy" victory.

And Kristol keeps arguing the past. The problems that have arisen in Iraq since the invasion, he maintains, have to be judged against what would have occurred had there been no invasion: a nuclear-armed Saddam conspiring with al Qaeda. To justify the war, Kristol is pushing the myth (debunked by U.S. intelligence) that Saddam was in cahoots with Osama bin Laden, and he's ignoring the fact that WMD inspectors were present in Iraq right before the invasion and (as we now know) doing a good job in determining Saddam had no unconventional weapons or nuclear bomb program. Such a policy could have been maintained.

Afghanistan: Steady as she goes, says Kristol. Well, not if you're one of those dozens of civilians who seem to be killed every few days in an errant attack from NATO and western forces. (Even Afghanistan President Hamid Karzai is fed up.) And shouldn't this war have been over years ago? Reconstruction is at a crawl The Taliban is resurgent. Opium production is setting new records. And the Bush administration (last time I checked) had no high-level official solely responsible for Afghanistan policy. Afghanistan has been a job neglected and unfinished.

Terrorism: Yes -- thankfully -- there have been no attacks here since 9/11. But recent intelligence reports say that al Qaeda (the real al Qaeda, not al Qaeda in Iraq) is becoming stronger. The man responsible for the worst act of terrorism ever visited upon the United States remains free. And the Bush administration's excesses in combating terrorism -- Guantanamo, warrantless wiretapping of Americans, and more -- have undermined the cause at home and abroad.

Foreign policy: Kristol does not mention that, thanks to Bush's misadventure in Iraq and other missteps, the United States' image abroad is in the sub-basement. He does note that we now have decent relations with Brazil. But he forgets about the worsening conflict between Israel and the Palestinians (and the other Palestinians) -- a conflict arguably exacerbated by Bush administration blunders.

The economy: All is fine, Kristol claims, pointing to conventional indicators and hailing Bush's tax cuts for the wealthy. But most Americans tell pollsters the country is not on the right track. Are they stupid? No, they are coping with various forms of insecurity and stress that Kristol does not recognize. Since 2000, the median income of working-age household has fallen each year. The economy has been growing, corporate profits are up, and the stock market is on the rise, but this recovery has handed working Americans weak growth in wages and salaries. The share of national income going to salaries and wages is at the lowest level since such stats were first compiled in 1929.

Moreover, the high costs of health care and education also worry many Americans. Kristol praises Bush's Medicare drug plan -- which routinely is assailed by critics on the left and right -- but Bush has done nothing to make health care more affordable and more available for most Americans. Forty-five million or so Americans remain uninsured. And while Kristol cheers globalization -- which is causing employment instability for Americans -- we can celebrate by eating tainted shrimp from China.

The Supreme Court: In Kristol's world, Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. and Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr., Bush's contributions to the court, are titans of jurisprudence respected throughout the land. Yet the Roberts court's recent decisions have sparked (justifiably) much controversy and rancor. In two separate decisions, Roberts protected corporate speech but trampled on the free speech rights of students. Roberts was also slammed by Justice Antonin Scalia for not having the guts to admit he was overturning precedent when he was. Bush's Supreme Court has become another battlefront in the partisan wars--not a symbol of accomplishment.

It's remarkable what Kristol leaves out of his bizarro-world view of Bush the Great: Hurricane Katrina, the collapse of the Justice Department, global warming, and much else. An American city was practically destroyed on Bush's watch, but that merits no consideration in Kristol's case for Bush. The Justice Department -- run by Bush cronies accused of corruption, incompetence, or both -- is in tatters. (A former department official tells me the administration is having a hard time finding people willing to fill the vacancies at the top.) And though Bush begrudgingly conceded that global warming is underway and human-induced, he has taken no significant steps to redress this pressing problem. If one wants to peer into the future, it could well be that Bush will be judged a failure more for his inaction on global warming than for his action in Iraq. Vetoing stem cell research legislation, commuting Scooter Libby's prison sentence, rewriting clean air rules to benefit industry, pushing tax breaks for oil companies, suppressing the work of scientists, enhancing government secrecy -- Bush has repeatedly placed parochial interests over the public interest.

The Bush-Cheney years have been marked by ineptitude, miscalculation, and scandal. A successful presidency? Bush will be lucky if he gets a public elementary school in his adopted hometown of Crawford, Tex., named after him. He has placed this country in a hole. Yet Kristol, with shovel in hand, points to that hole and says, Trust me -- we're about to strike oil!

If it's true that history repeats first as tragedy and then as farce, Kristol has short-circuited the process and gone straight to parody. His Bush boosterism -- an act of self-justification -- would be amusing were it not for all the damage he has helped Bush to cause.

[AJ_Skins]

I'm starting to get a sneaking suspicion that America is going to win, and Democrats are going to lose.

[Koolblue13]

I'm starting to get a sneaking suspicion that America is going to win, and Democrats are going to lose.

Don't look now, but Democrats are Americans.

[AJ_Skins]

Don't look now, but Democrats are Americans.

Actually, many of them prefer to be known as "citizens of the world".

[Baculus]

I'm starting to get a sneaking suspicion that America is going to win, and Democrats are going to lose.

Wow - you didn't read any of this article, did you?

And, by the way, America most certainly isn't YOU. If you hate this nation so much, then maybe it isn't the best place for you!

[Baculus]

Actually, many of them prefer to be known as "citizens of the world".

Yeah, that sure is a convincing argument. :doh:

A.J. Skins - the enemy within.

[Baculus]

By the way, I thought that was a good response to neo-con Kristol's article from the other day. Kristol was wrong before the war, and he is wrong now as well.

[StillUnknown]

How does a person like Kristol, who has been wrong on damn near every issue concerning Iraq, still hold influence?............it boggles the mind.

[The 12th Commandment]

How does a person like Kristol, who has been wrong on damn near every issue concerning Iraq, still hold influence?............it boggles the mind.

The same could be said for others in an ever dwindling portion of the right. Funny, I wouldn't presume to put anyone here in that group, unless they make it clear that they are. I can't say the same courtesy' been paid to me.

[AJ_Skins]

Wow - you didn't read any of this article, did you?

I'm talking about Iraq. We'll see what happens. I have a feeling the Democrats are out on a limb that's going to be sawed off.

[Destino]

I'm starting to get a sneaking suspicion that America is going to win, and Democrats are going to lose.

America is going to win the war on terror, just as soon as we get the right wing that has been hindering our efforts out of power.

- Bush and the GOP decided to rush our involvement in Iraq when we were still fighting in Afghanistan against the guys that actually attacked us (not the ones Cheney claims attacked us). Al Qaeda had no hope of defeating us in afghanistan and the GOP decided to give them the one place where they could claim victory, a nation certain to suffer civil unrest.

- Bush and the GOP decided to give the generals troops level far short of needed to occupy Iraq. I think they did it for political reasons not wanting to face the voters and tell them so many more of their children would be sent into harms way. Perhaps they did it because the cost to of the war (which was initially grossly underestimated) would have been so high with proper troop counts. Either way, money or politics, they lead us into a bad situation ill equipped to win the peace.

- Bush and the GOP allowed the Iraqi standing army to be disbanded. Suddenly the men that knew where all the weapons were and trained to use them were out casts. The insurgency was given an army to fight with over-night.

- Bush and the GOP have claimed constantly that we have Al Qaeda on the run yet the latest intell estimate says they are at or above pre war levels. They have grown, as has the taliban, in afghanistan and used the iraqi war to grow their strength.

The only thing that has stood between the United States and Victory is the GOP and a President that took us off the battlefield against terror and placed us in a civil war.

[nuposse87]

Actually, many of them prefer to be known as "citizens of the world".

personally I don't think thats an all too bad. I'd rather Humane to my fellow man then be blinded by ignorant patriotism, but thats just me:2cents:

[Baculus]

I'm talking about Iraq. We'll see what happens. I have a feeling the Democrats are out on a limb that's going to be sawed off.

The issue is that we have seen what happens. And while I do believe that there are postives happening in Iraq, most of which are never reported, I don't see why my nephew has to go there and 1) seperate two sides in a civil war, and 2) nation build in a country while, here in our own nation, we have a lot of work to do.

Can you imagine if we had spent that $500 billion HERE, in THIS NATION?!

While some right-wing folks talk abourt patriotism, they support billions of dollars being sent to some far off nation, while our own nation could use those billions on education, the infrastructure, among other vital needs.

I just don't understand why some Americans put Iraq's need in front of ours. How is that patriotic?

And I am completely sympathtic to the Iraqi people - I really am. But Bush said in 2000 we weren't going to be involved in nation building, and here we are doing it.

It just makes little sense.

By the way, if you don't think you are a "world citizen" in any way, then why are we in other nations, A.J.?

[Hooper]

All those Iraq War naysayers... well they've been proven right on almost every issue.

And whether one was for the war or not, as an American, that sucks.

[Burgold]

All those Iraq War naysayers... well they've been proven right on almost every issue.

And whether one was for the war or not, as an American, that sucks.

I completely agree with this. I would have loved to look like a fool. I still hope ten years from now or twenty I can look back and say, I was short sighted and impatient. All those sacrifices were worth it.

[Hooper]

I completely agree with this. I would have loved to look like a fool. I still hope ten years from now or twenty I can look back and say, I was short sighted and impatient. All those sacrifices were worth it.

Exactly.

[AJ_Skins]

I completely agree with this. I would have loved to look like a fool. I still hope ten years from now or twenty I can look back and say, I was short sighted and impatient. All those sacrifices were worth it.

Then we should stay, right?

[Hooper]

That is the question, AJ. And I don't pretend to know the answer.

[Burgold]

Frankly, I don't know. I see it being bad for us either way. I also see it being bad for Iraq and the Middle East either way.

The question I have right now is which will cause less damage (short term versus long term) If I had to answer, I don't think we should leave this second, but I do think we should find a way to gracefully lessen our presence or phase out. Now, if I could steal Father Time's hour glass I very well may have stopped us from going altogether. I suspect so would many at the DOD and White House. However, my magic can't quite reverse time.

[cjcdaman]

personally I don't think thats an all too bad. I'd rather Humane to my fellow man then be blinded by ignorant patriotism, but thats just me:2cents:

WOW! Just, wow! Ignorant patriotism???

Well, you have the opportunity to say **** like that because of many, many, many men and women who showed lots of patriotism.

And, I could pick your post apart with your third grade grammar mistakes. GED!!!!!!! GED!!!!!!!! GED!!!!!!!!!

[nuposse87]

WOW! Just, wow! Ignorant patriotism???

Well, you have the opportunity to say **** like that because of many, many, many men and women who showed lots of patriotism.

And, I could pick your post apart with your third grade grammar mistakes. GED!!!!!!! GED!!!!!!!! GED!!!!!!!!!

haha i go to JMU and I don't need to spell out everything for the likes of you, you can fo **** yourself for all I care.

Patriotism is ok when its utlized correctly. I don't think this was the correct war for the US to wage. I know what the country has been founded on and how many have died in its construction up till now, but I'm not gonna blindly support what I think is wrong, which in this case is the Iraqi war.

for the men and women who have volunteered to go and fight this war, great! more power to em, some of my friends have enlisted, thats their own choice. They're not fighting for my freedom to say whats on my mind right now, their fighting because our current president thinks its in America's interest, I vehemently disgaree with this President in our staying there. I find most arguments that back the current president up to be founded on paranoia and ignorance.

[cjcdaman]

haha i go to JMU and I don't need to spell out everything for the likes of you, you can fo **** yourself for all I care.

Haha. I go to JMU, and I don't need to spell out everything for the likes of you. You can go **** yourself for all I care.

I put your mistakes in bold text . Try better next time, Timmy. Fourth grade is right around the corner.

[nuposse87]

Haha. I go to JMU, and I don't need to spell out everything for the likes of you. You can go **** yourself for all I care.

I put your mistakes in bold text . Try better next time, Timmy. Fourth grade is right around the corner.

thanks I'm sure my message didn't get across with my horrifiic lack of correct grammar.

oh and kiss my ass

[Vinnick]

Who is the grammar snob? Isn't anybody going to actually discuss the article? It's already point by point. That makes it easier. Whick Op-ed is more factually correct?

Kristol or Corn?

[19Skins72]

Anyone that takes Kristol seriously (at this point) is beyond help or hope.

...

As for the rest, I simply pray for our troops...our leadership in both parties has clearly failed them.