portisizzle Posted May 24, 2007 Share Posted May 24, 2007 O rly?http://zogby.com/news/ReadNews.dbm?ID=1075 REALLY!!! Cut and paste what you want me to see on that link. I read every word and have not seen your excerpt. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Larry Posted May 24, 2007 Share Posted May 24, 2007 Apologies to any hypothetically reasonable people who may have been reading this thread. The rudeness and childishness demonstrated has caused me to behave in a similar manner. In my defense, I'll claim that my intent was to try to get posters to debate their problems rather than simply issue demands. But I don't have the power to make people be polite. Or to make them be rational. (And apparently, they don't really care to take my advice and voluntarily steer things in that direction.) But I do have the power not to watch it. See ya. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Isifhan Posted May 24, 2007 Share Posted May 24, 2007 REALLY!!! Cut and paste what you want me to see on that link. I read every word and have not seen your excerpt. I take it logic is not your strong suit....this is kind of fun actually. The poll, conducted in conjunction with Le Moyne College’s Center for Peace and Global Studies, showed that 29% of the respondents, serving in various branches of the armed forces, said the U.S. should leave Iraq “immediately,” while another 22% said they should leave in the next six months. Another 21% said troops should be out between six and 12 months, while 23% said they should stay “as long as they are needed.” In "poll" form the question would look like this: (exit means to leave, maybe that was the spot that was giving you trouble) When do you think the US should exit the country (Iraq) a. Immediatly b. Within the next six months c. Between 6-12 months d. as long as you are needed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
portisizzle Posted May 24, 2007 Share Posted May 24, 2007 Apologies to any hypothetically reasonable people who may have been reading this thread. The rudeness and childishness demonstrated has caused me to behave in a similar manner. In my defense, I'll claim that my intent was to try to get posters to debate their problems rather than simply issue demands. But I don't have the power to make people be polite. Or to make them be rational. (And apparently, they don't really care to take my advice and voluntarily steer things in that direction.) But I do have the power not to watch it. See ya. Zogby is the same guy who predicted Kerry would beat Bush and was still predicting it on the evening of the election based upon his own flawed pre-election polling and exit polling -- until Kerry lost, that is. Bye!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
portisizzle Posted May 24, 2007 Share Posted May 24, 2007 In "poll" form the question would look like this: (exit means to leave, maybe that was the spot that was giving you trouble) The "poll" form of the question is exactly what i am asking for. You do not have it so you are unable to show me. The link is an article written by Zogby or the College. And it is quite editorialized. Find me the "poll" form question that resulted in that answer and then we can talk. Until then....... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DjTj Posted May 24, 2007 Share Posted May 24, 2007 Find me the "poll" form question that resulted in that answer and then we can talk. Until then....... Why are you still making this demand if What if I told you I already knew the answer? you already know the answer? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
portisizzle Posted May 24, 2007 Share Posted May 24, 2007 Why are you still making this demand if you already know the answer? "What if I told you I already knew the answer" is a far cry from me saying "I knew the answer" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Predicto Posted May 25, 2007 Share Posted May 25, 2007 Any one want to take a poll on how olberman is doing? :laugh: You are correct that conservatives do tend to respond better to partisan ranting than do liberals. The conservative side supports tons of guys twice as hostile and aggressive as Olberman, and their audience just laps is up because they are "Dittoheads" and "Great Americans" that need to be told every day what to think and what to be outraged about. You got Rush and Hannity and Liddy and Savage and O'Reilly and all the rest. Olberman is our only guy. It's kind of sad. We just aren't sheeplike, I guess. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Redskins Diehard Posted May 25, 2007 Share Posted May 25, 2007 without reading the whole thread i would like to know if chomerics olberman alert went off Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
twa Posted May 25, 2007 Share Posted May 25, 2007 You are correct that conservatives do tend to respond better to partisan ranting than do liberals. The conservative side supports tons of guys twice as hostile and aggressive as Olberman, and their audience just laps is up because they are "Dittoheads" and "Great Americans" that need to be told every day what to think and what to be outraged about. You got Rush and Hannity and Liddy and Savage and O'Reilly and all the rest.Olberman is our only guy. It's kind of sad. We just aren't sheeplike, I guess. Or perhaps there are not as many that buy that bs from either side. But you are welcome to him and the others if that brings meaning to your life. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.