H-O-G Posted January 16, 2007 Share Posted January 16, 2007 he only recently declared for the NFL Draft. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
brandies Posted January 16, 2007 Share Posted January 16, 2007 Either Branch or Anderson should be there at 6. If not we trade down and pick up adams at 10. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mistertim Posted January 16, 2007 Share Posted January 16, 2007 Andersen looks like a Peppers/Strahan love childhe's an athletic beast Bubba is right here, he really is also an amazing athlete. The guy came in as a WR at about 6'6, 215 or 220 and was asked to help them out at DE. He then put on over 60 lbs in a couple years, didn't lose much speed (I believe I read that he runs around a 4.6), picked up a brand new position on the other side of the ball and by his Junior year led the SEC (as another poster stated: SEC > all other conferences in talent) in sacks and was 2nd in tackles for loss. That is pretty much the definition of athleticism right there. Also, if he is this good after just a couple seasons at DE imagine how much our D line coaches will be able to get out of him after more intensive work on technique. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedskinzOwnU Posted January 16, 2007 Share Posted January 16, 2007 Bubba is right here, he really is also an amazing athlete. The guy came in as a WR at about 6'6, 215 or 220 and was asked to help them out at DE. He then put on over 60 lbs in a couple years, didn't lose much speed (I believe I read that he runs around a 4.6), picked up a brand new position on the other side of the ball and by his Junior year led the SEC (as another poster stated: SEC > all other conferences in talent) in sacks and was 2nd in tackles for loss. That is pretty much the definition of athleticism right there. Also, if he is this good after just a couple seasons at DE imagine how much our D line coaches will be able to get out of him after more intensive work on technique. The more I hear about this guy, the more I like him. Let's just pray Tampa doesn't take him and he should be ours. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NavyDave Posted January 16, 2007 Share Posted January 16, 2007 Ww hopefully can't go wrong with Anderson or Branch Anderson gets my vote because the speed in the SEC is close to NFL levels so the transition in the first year shouldn't be that difficult for the elite players coming out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DonMagicJuan Posted January 16, 2007 Share Posted January 16, 2007 3 letters...S C C....nobody understood why OHIO ST lost to FLORIDA...another 3 letters for the answer... S C C...talent in the SCC is much better then what you think! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedskinzOwnU Posted January 16, 2007 Share Posted January 16, 2007 3 letters...S C C....nobody understood why OHIO ST lost to FLORIDA...another 3 letters for the answer... S C C...talent in the SCC is much better then what you think! Your post is probably right, except that it's SEC not SCC Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mistertim Posted January 16, 2007 Share Posted January 16, 2007 Your post is probably right, except that it's SEC not SCC :laugh: :laugh: But yeah, also remember the spanking that LSU put on ND. Like Florida vs OSU, LSU just completely dominated. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
No_Pressure Posted January 16, 2007 Share Posted January 16, 2007 3 letters...S C C....nobody understood why OHIO ST lost to FLORIDA...another 3 letters for the answer... S C C...talent in the SCC is much better then what you think! S.outh E.astern C.onference http://www.secsports.com/ S.eminole C.ommunity C.ollege? http://www.scc-fl.edu/ :laugh::laugh: Seriously though I think the idea is that Gaines Adams might be gone before #6 and that Branch and Anderson might be our more probable options. Out of the two personally I would rather have Anderson over Anderson. Between Anderson and Adams I dont really care though I think Anderson might have better potential considering how young he is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Sisko Posted January 16, 2007 Share Posted January 16, 2007 Aint nuttin' better'n nat SCC futbawl yawl!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
obiemills Posted January 16, 2007 Share Posted January 16, 2007 Thank you for the question and to all who have responded. I don't know anything about any of them but you brought a good discussion to the board. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JoeGibbsThickandthin Posted January 16, 2007 Share Posted January 16, 2007 We need a pass rushing end. PERIOD Carter is a good pass rusher when not doubled. But then again we need a beast d tackle. But prefer the pass rushing end. We can not get pressure rushing 4 other than Carter. CUT WYNN. Restructure Daniels. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
909997 Posted January 16, 2007 Share Posted January 16, 2007 Jamaal Anderson is a rechard seamour type guy u cant run on his side and he makes tackles look silly in passrush one on one adams is a passrusher like raheem brock bad at stoping the run Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
riggoraider Posted January 16, 2007 Share Posted January 16, 2007 the fact anderson played in the SEC where more NFL talent now resides.. anderson is like a jason taylor type/julius pepper.. the guy can play both the run and pass effectively and would work great in a GW scheme The combines may or may not prove this point. Right now we are putting the cart before the horse by predicting which lineman would be best for us. What he did in college does not really dictate what he is going to do in the pros. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JuiceMan_74 Posted January 16, 2007 Share Posted January 16, 2007 alan branch Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheLongshot Posted January 16, 2007 Share Posted January 16, 2007 Also with Adams you are banking on his potential. A lot of people feel that can gain the weight and be a better run defender, but so far he hasn't shown it. Meanwhile, Anderson seems to be the complete package already. Course, things can change with the practices and the combines. Jason Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MartinC Posted January 16, 2007 Share Posted January 16, 2007 Bubba is right here, he really is also an amazing athlete. The guy came in as a WR at about 6'6, 215 or 220 and was asked to help them out at DE. He then put on over 60 lbs in a couple years, didn't lose much speed (I believe I read that he runs around a 4.6), picked up a brand new position on the other side of the ball and by his Junior year led the SEC (as another poster stated: SEC > all other conferences in talent) in sacks and was 2nd in tackles for loss. That is pretty much the definition of athleticism right there. Also, if he is this good after just a couple seasons at DE imagine how much our D line coaches will be able to get out of him after more intensive work on technique. Mmmmmmm. He put on 60lbs in 2 years without losng any speed - he must use the same training programme as Shawn Merriman Being a Brit I see little College football so these guys are just names and scouting reports to me so I really have no clue which of these 3 guys is the best fit/player for us. I do think that DE is the bigger need and that all things being equal you take the bigger guy over the tweener so I would lean towards Anderson unless Adams is clearly superior at getting to the QB. From what I have read any of the 3 would be a good pick - which is why we probably do somethng daft like pick a WR or corner :doh: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
No_Pressure Posted January 16, 2007 Share Posted January 16, 2007 Mmmmmmm. He put on 60lbs in 2 years without losng any speed - he must use the same training programme as Shawn Merriman I first read this and said to myself: What the **** is a program-e? Does he mean program? He must be from... Being a Brit... In mid thought I read this...I thought it was funny at least...there must be some colourful characters at the programme he goes to. In all seriousness I agree, DE is the bigger need for us...in 16 games Phillip Daniels didnt do much to convince me he should stay over a 6th round pick rookie DT who logged more tackles than him in 4 less starts. Adams might be gone by the time our pick comes up. I think clearly one of these defensive ends will be available barring some bizarre event where someone ahead of us drafts Branch and we have the pick between Adams and Anderson. I think either one would be good but I would rather go with the physical specimen in the good college division with the nice statistical season. I think honestly no matter what we do we will improve on defense. If we draft Branch and put him next to Carter, Andre may get more sacks and at the least our run defense should improve. If we draft Adams we should have good pressure on both ends of the line, and if we draft Anderson we will have good pressure and probably a better run defense than we would with Adams. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cozmikbuffalo Posted January 16, 2007 Share Posted January 16, 2007 Because he is simply the most NFL ready , most complete package as a player than the others in the draft . He is good as run stopper but has that fast motor and escapability to put good and steady pressure inside the pocket , inside the backfield . He is smart and a good team player plus he is a physical freak and very young . He is to say the least a very possible franchise type player . A Dexter Manley , Charles Mann type of player . And with that kind of talent A. Carter would be that much better and so would our defensive backfield and LB's . No more 9 minutes drives keeping the ball away from our offense and tiring out our defense . That's why !! Coz Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[[ghost]] Posted January 16, 2007 Share Posted January 16, 2007 Well, everyone knew that Adams had to come out. Thats why he was head and shoulders above the competition. Then came out Anderson. Apparently, it caught people by surprise. The reason I think he's more valuable is that he had more sacks (13 1/2), is better in run defense, and is more athletically talented (he used to be a WR), though its hard to dimish Adams's athletic ability after that blocked field goal for a score. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
H-O-G Posted January 16, 2007 Share Posted January 16, 2007 lol, I live less than 5 miles away from S.C.C Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fredburgskin Posted January 16, 2007 Share Posted January 16, 2007 I think I would go with Anderson based on his size. Over the past three seasons I have noticed that the size of our front seven seems to be getting smaller and smaller. While this might be great for speed I think it puts us at a disadvantage when going agaist stonger run orieted offenses. If we are going to place an emphasis on Joe Gibbs football next season (running the ball on O and stopping the run on D) this franchise needs to place an emphases on acquiring either Anderson or Branch through the draft and resigning Dockery. It doesn't make any sense to get a smaller pass-rushing defensive end in Adams when we already have that in Carter. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DonMagicJuan Posted January 16, 2007 Share Posted January 16, 2007 man leave me alone hahahhaha i was tired from AC....and depressed from losing $$$ SEC...i didnt even drink, jeezz.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tr4 Posted January 16, 2007 Share Posted January 16, 2007 enough with the comparisons of Anderson to Jason Taylor or Julius Peppers. If this guy was anything like either of those two he would be a top 2 pick. Its way too early to even come up with these mock drafts. Every year the same thing happens, you have all these sure fire mock drafts and then the combine comes around and completely flips everyones predictions around. I know everyone loves to predict whats going to happen all the time but just be patient and wait for at least the combine. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Taurus82 Posted January 17, 2007 Share Posted January 17, 2007 Ja All The Way Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.