gambit187 Posted March 10, 2006 Share Posted March 10, 2006 Redskins | Team remains over the salary cap Thu, 9 Mar 2006 17:04:36 -0800 Adam Schefter, of the NFL Network, reports the Washington Redskins are one of four teams over the new salary cap limit. The Redskins are about $7 million over the cap. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JimmiJo Posted March 10, 2006 Share Posted March 10, 2006 Son, don't you know that pot is illegal in most states? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bangee7 Posted March 10, 2006 Share Posted March 10, 2006 A Troll from DC ?? could this be true? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hueman Posted March 10, 2006 Share Posted March 10, 2006 schefter also said the smart money was on washington to get TO Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PCRoughrider Posted March 10, 2006 Share Posted March 10, 2006 Adam Schefter is an idiot who, obviously, is opposed to doing research. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TaylorPickSix Posted March 10, 2006 Share Posted March 10, 2006 okay we can get under by cutting those five or six guys alone so who cares. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MisterPinstripe Posted March 10, 2006 Share Posted March 10, 2006 Do not listen to Adam, he does not know now, and never has known what he is talking about. He is kind of annoying. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brown_Hornet Posted March 10, 2006 Share Posted March 10, 2006 Adam Schefter is an idiot who, obviously, is opposed to doing research. Are you suggesting that the Skins aren't over the cap? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KingGibbs Posted March 10, 2006 Share Posted March 10, 2006 Adams last name should be Schmuck. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bubba9497 Posted March 10, 2006 Share Posted March 10, 2006 Are you suggesting that the Skins aren't over the cap? lets just say they won't be come Friday midnight, that's all that matters isn't it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hueman Posted March 10, 2006 Share Posted March 10, 2006 the point of us ragging on schefter is because he's a tool. who cares if we're over the cap, if simple moves will put us under? he's just trying to insinuate that we're a loser team destined for cap hell. it's sad, really. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brown_Hornet Posted March 10, 2006 Share Posted March 10, 2006 Yessir, it is. But is the writer really a tool for reporting the current situation? Anything else is speculation. I mean, you don't really believe that the Skins will be $19 under the cap either ...do you? hue, you got all that from a 2 sentence blurb? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hueman Posted March 10, 2006 Share Posted March 10, 2006 i'm a skins fan... i'll believe anything. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bubba9497 Posted March 10, 2006 Share Posted March 10, 2006 Yessir, it is. But is the writer really a tool for reporting the current situation? Anything else is speculation. I mean, you don't really believe that the Skins will be $19 under the cap either ...do you? Tandler said the Skins "could" be and gave examples. Schefter is doing the norm, saying something that he knows will not be true tomorrow, but implying that this will be a fact at Friday midnight, leaving the uneducated fan thinking they will have to do something drastic to get under... or go one step farther, and suggests they are cheaters like Peter King did. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GSF Posted March 10, 2006 Share Posted March 10, 2006 7 million over now, 19 million under very soon. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Weirdo Posted March 10, 2006 Share Posted March 10, 2006 i'm a skins fan... i'll believe anything. :rotflmao: Hilarious! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Art Posted March 10, 2006 Share Posted March 10, 2006 Schefter is still struggling to find his legs in this national reporting insider thing. He just can't get himself beyond his own incorrect stories. Mort and others simply blow past it as if it didn't happen when they are wrong. They don't linger. Adam actually tries to create false stories and spin them as if he's been telling it that way the whole time. Anyone who even minutely follows the sport knows the Redskins have technically not made any moves to get under the cap. Reporting they ARE under is simply a way to confirm a false report he's been standing by that we are a cap strapped team. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brown_Hornet Posted March 10, 2006 Share Posted March 10, 2006 I don't know his stuff, I was however interested in knowing which teams still need to make moves just to get under the cap. I just took it at face value and didn't try reading into it. Just as I hear Giants fans clamoring for Lavar, Witherspoon, Peterson, Madison etc...I am aware that all teams got the $7.5 and many of those teams are also able to do the same type of restructures that the afore-mentioned article suggests that the Skins can do. Regardless, it should be a fun FA period. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ImmortalDragon Posted March 10, 2006 Share Posted March 10, 2006 Tandler said the Skins "could" be and gave examples.Schecter is doing the norm, saying something that he knows will not be true tomorrow, but implying that this will be a fact at Friday midnight, leaving the uneducated fan thinking they will have to do something drastic to get under... or go one step farther, and suggests they are cheaters like Peter King did. Its not as if he singled out the Redskins, he listed the salary caps of at least 5 other teams. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Byner21 Posted March 10, 2006 Share Posted March 10, 2006 Anyone who even minutely follows the sport knows the Redskins have technically not made any moves to get under the cap. Reporting they ARE under is simply a way to confirm a false report he's been standing by that we are a cap strapped team. Amen! It's as if everybody's partying New Year's style at 11:55pm on 12/31 and he's the guy who says..."You know, it's not officially the new year yet, don't count your chickens before they hatch!" He lost me at "the smart money's on Washington" regarding T.O. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ddpls Posted March 10, 2006 Share Posted March 10, 2006 Adams last name should be Schmuck. That is my Ex brother in laws last name, funny thing! Maybe they are distant cousins? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peregrine Posted March 10, 2006 Share Posted March 10, 2006 You have to understand, these people do not know what they are talking about(by "these people" I mean the writers at these media outlets). Most of their "facts" are usually half wrong. Why do you ask? Simple, because they take so-and-sos word for it rather than doing their own research. You can go through an article by any of these people and point to 3-4 "facts" and numbers that are just completely and utterly false. Dont believe everything you read. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.