Califan007 The Constipated Posted October 30, 2005 Share Posted October 30, 2005 I personally think Brunell this season has earned the right to play the entire game, sink or swim...but if the offense stays as putrid in the 3rd quarter as it has been in the first half, do you consider putting Ramsey in just to see if you can cause a spark in this one game?...Or do you go down with the ship with Brunell at the controls? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Taylor 21 Posted October 30, 2005 Share Posted October 30, 2005 Absolutely not Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghost of Posted October 30, 2005 Share Posted October 30, 2005 I personally think Brunell this season has earned the right to play the entire game, sink or swim...but if the offense stays as putrid in the 3rd quarter as it has been in the first half, do you consider putting Ramsey in just to see if you can cause a spark in this one game?...Or do you go down with the ship with Brunell at the controls? I'd like to see some consistency from the coach. Brunell threw it RIGHT to Pierce, he's looked scared and weak all game. I'm not talking a season-long benching, but at some point you gotta try to WIN. But I hope it doesn't come to that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skinsfanxxvi Posted October 30, 2005 Share Posted October 30, 2005 put ramsey in when he plays for someone else Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SlinginSammy HOF '63 Posted October 30, 2005 Share Posted October 30, 2005 Not only no, but hell no! Why start the revolving QB spot? Jeez, we don't need the media wolves puncing us again. The receivers have been covered and our receivers have dropped four passes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blondie Posted October 30, 2005 Share Posted October 30, 2005 Uh, at NO point. Blondie Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hail2skins Posted October 30, 2005 Share Posted October 30, 2005 Maybe we make a game of it in the second half, but its just one of those days when a team gets owned, and that's the Skins right now. Hopefully its just a blip on the radar screen, albeit in an important game. But Brunell has led us to 4-2.......lets keep him in. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FarEastBeast Posted October 30, 2005 Share Posted October 30, 2005 I trust in the coaches, if they're seeing something on the field that tells them Brunell is playing horribly or scared like I believe... well Ramsey would probably be even worse, but he could always provide a spark like he did against the Titans off the bench. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Art Posted October 30, 2005 Share Posted October 30, 2005 Brunell is playing poorly, but, he has had five or six balls right into the hands of his receivers only to see them drop it. It'd be one thing if he wasn't coming close to guys, but, right now, it's the whole unit, not one player so you hope they can come out of it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Potato Sack Posted October 30, 2005 Share Posted October 30, 2005 NOOOoooooooooooooooo Dear God, please don't let Ramsey play! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skinsfan93 Posted October 30, 2005 Share Posted October 30, 2005 This thread is stupid! "Sinking ship"???? If we lose, we lose. It's one game. We will still be over 500 for the season. Too many people with their "what have you done for me lately" attitude. Get a grip! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KDawg Posted October 30, 2005 Share Posted October 30, 2005 Nothing against Pat in this situation. But at no point do you put him in. Brunell has played a great season of football up until this point, you don't bench him based on your receivers and offensive lines miscues. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Califan007 The Constipated Posted October 30, 2005 Author Share Posted October 30, 2005 Not only no, but hell no! Why start the revolving QB spot? Jeez, we don't need the media wolves puncing us again. The receivers have been covered and our receivers have dropped four passes. Switching QBs in as horrendous a game as this one isn't exactly the sign of a "revolving QB spot"...and it's been done by Gibbs himself in his past. It IS possible, you know, to reach a conclusion in a game that pretty much nothing your QB is doing is going well, and if nothing else might as well put your backup in for a possible spark...some of the best coaches in the NFL have done it. You don't do it every week (*ahem* Spurrier *ahem*), but 50 total yards of offense in one half is not an "every week" performance. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skins24 Posted October 30, 2005 Share Posted October 30, 2005 When we're up 35-19 with two minutes left... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SlinginSammy HOF '63 Posted October 30, 2005 Share Posted October 30, 2005 Wow, maybe Ramsey could help Betts hang onto the ball. :doh: We completely blow today. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SittingBull Posted October 30, 2005 Share Posted October 30, 2005 Thank God I'm not a mod I would ban you right now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Califan007 The Constipated Posted October 30, 2005 Author Share Posted October 30, 2005 This thread is stupid!"Sinking ship"???? If we lose, we lose. It's one game. We will still be over 500 for the season. Too many people with their "what have you done for me lately" attitude. Get a grip! Who the hell's talking about benching Brunell beyond perhaps a quarter of play at most?...Geez, as I've said before, sports fans seem the most irrational and emotional people in the planet at times. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WhodatSkinsFan? Posted October 30, 2005 Share Posted October 30, 2005 if/ when #8 get's hurt Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WhodatSkinsFan? Posted October 30, 2005 Share Posted October 30, 2005 then... and only then... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Califan007 The Constipated Posted October 30, 2005 Author Share Posted October 30, 2005 Thank God I'm not a mod I would ban you right now. Put in a request, maybe they'll deem my question and post so detrimental to the site that they'll agree with you...lol :doh: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SlinginSammy HOF '63 Posted October 30, 2005 Share Posted October 30, 2005 Switching QBs in as horrendous a game as this one isn't exactly the sign of a "revolving QB spot"...and it's been done by Gibbs himself in his past. It IS possible, you know, to reach a conclusion in a game that pretty much nothing your QB is doing is going well, and if nothing else might as well put your backup in for a possible spark...some of the best coaches in the NFL have done it. You don't do it every week (*ahem* Spurrier *ahem*), but 50 total yards of offense in one half is not an "every week" performance. Yeah, but you know how the media is. they're finally starting to kiss our rumps. They're probably jumping off of our bandwagon in this game. It's going to be bad enough that we have to read tomorrow that we finally have "been exposed" then have them all over starting rumors about a QB controversey. Ramsey can't prevent the receivers from dropping passes. He can't prevent fumbles and TOs that give the Giants a short field. We have to play business as usual. We gotta start hanging onto the damn ball. I swear the team lathered their hands up in butter before this game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Califan007 The Constipated Posted October 30, 2005 Author Share Posted October 30, 2005 Yeah, but you know how the media is. they're finally starting to kiss our rumps. They're probably jumping off of our bandwagon in this game. It's going to be bad enough that we have to read tomorrow that we finally have "been exposed" then have them all over starting rumors about a QB controversey. Ramsey can't prevent the receivers from dropping passes. He can't prevent fumbles and TOs that give the Giants a short field. We have to play business as usual. We gotta start hanging onto the damn ball. I swear the team lathered their hands up in butter before this game. Well, while I think they shouldn't make coaching and gametime decisions based on how the media will play it up, I agree with the rest of what you said... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SlinginSammy HOF '63 Posted October 30, 2005 Share Posted October 30, 2005 Jeez, a drop by Royal and then a false start....now a sack. This could've been a good day to stay in bed. :doh: I again stand by what I said that our receivers lathered themselves in butter. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Freud69 Posted October 30, 2005 Share Posted October 30, 2005 Ramsey? You don't put in an idiot when a moron fails, do you? I think the year is pretty much a wash....lets see if we can begin to rebuild with Campbell. Nothing to lose in that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stoney26 Posted October 30, 2005 Share Posted October 30, 2005 Id put Ramsey in to avoid injury to Brunell. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.