TahoeSkin Posted September 24, 2005 Share Posted September 24, 2005 Just saw Fox's Pro Football Weekly and heard former 3 time All-Pro Bronco Safety John Lynch say he thought Moss was the best receiver in all of pro football, because of the way he stretches the field. He says that he's never seen safetys have to step back 20 yards to adjust for the long ball threat as they do with Moss. Well sorry guys, but he was talking about RANDY Moss. But after Monday's pummelling of the Cowpukes, I couldn't help think that, hmmm, with the proper playcalling, we might well see another Moss added to that category. :wavetowel Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chachie Posted September 24, 2005 Share Posted September 24, 2005 Fooled by a WATERBOY. :doh: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MeNoRevs Posted September 24, 2005 Share Posted September 24, 2005 Santana will have to do alot more of what he did Monday night to be concidered one of the top recievers in the NFL. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GhostRider Posted September 24, 2005 Share Posted September 24, 2005 Nice one:) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fifty Gut Posted September 24, 2005 Share Posted September 24, 2005 wow thanks for the useless thread, buddy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
laurent Posted September 24, 2005 Share Posted September 24, 2005 What makes Moss so dangerous is that on top of being fast he's got the size and leaping ability to go up and catch balls in traffic. That's not something that you will see from Moss who relies on his speed to get behind defenders. Personally, I'd still take Owens over Randy Moss though. Unlike Moss, Owen is a threat regardless of where on the field he catches the ball. He can get you the tough yards across the middle, rack up YAC on short and intermediate routes and he's also an excellent blocker. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skin_finatic Posted September 24, 2005 Share Posted September 24, 2005 Fooled by a WATERBOY. :doh: damn waterboys Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dfitzo53 Posted September 24, 2005 Share Posted September 24, 2005 I knew something was wrong with the title of this thread. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
terpfan Posted September 24, 2005 Share Posted September 24, 2005 This actually tricked people?? Duhh... of course Randy Moss is the best WR in the NFL.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mrdoctor Posted September 24, 2005 Share Posted September 24, 2005 yea i saw it on ESPN.. moss is better than owens Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fuji869 Posted September 24, 2005 Share Posted September 24, 2005 I had a feeling that he was talking about Randy Moss. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chachie Posted September 24, 2005 Share Posted September 24, 2005 What makes Moss so dangerous is that on top of being fast he's got the size and leaping ability to go up and catch balls in traffic. That's not something that you will see from Moss who relies on his speed to get behind defenders.Personally, I'd still take Owens over Randy Moss though. Unlike Moss, Owen is a threat regardless of where on the field he catches the ball. He can get you the tough yards across the middle, rack up YAC on short and intermediate routes and he's also an excellent blocker. I'm ashamed to admit it but Terrell is a staple on my fantasy squad. The guy's amazing. Randy is a super-natural thing to watch but as we all know, he quits. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NoCalMike Posted September 24, 2005 Share Posted September 24, 2005 Randy Moss has the most pure athletic ability on the field of any WR in the NFL. He is a true freak of nature. Owens is good, but as you saw by our defense, he can be contained. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr. D Posted September 24, 2005 Share Posted September 24, 2005 Thanx for another useless post/thread. this board is becomming full of them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gamebreaker Posted September 24, 2005 Share Posted September 24, 2005 Moss isn't a complete reciever, Owens is. I'd rather want Owens if I had to choose between the two, because he can produce on more types of routes than Moss can. Yet people need to know that Moss is a better clutch player, by far. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
s0crates Posted September 24, 2005 Share Posted September 24, 2005 Santana Moss leads the NFC in receiving yards, tied with one T.0. Just a little food for thought. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bubba9497 Posted September 24, 2005 Share Posted September 24, 2005 I would have been fooled if it was about Santanna Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheREALJBird Posted September 24, 2005 Share Posted September 24, 2005 Santana Moss leads the NFC in receiving yards, tied with one T.0. Just a little food for thought. Yea but there's only been 2 games played thus far....still, off to a hell of a start though, let's hope he can keep those numbers up :logo: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.