pR0JEkT 21 Posted September 7, 2005 Share Posted September 7, 2005 They are talking about the Saints going to a different city for good..whatcha take on this subject? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SkinsBry Posted September 7, 2005 Share Posted September 7, 2005 I would say no to L.A. San Antonio or Las Vegas would support a team well, Vegas a little more since there are alot of Dallas fans and probably some Houston fans in San Antonio. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rebornempowered Posted September 7, 2005 Share Posted September 7, 2005 Any place but LA. They have let multiple franchises go. Don't give them another one because it will just end up in another city in the long run anyway. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GoSkins561 Posted September 7, 2005 Share Posted September 7, 2005 Where would they play in Baton Rouge, the team should stay in Louisianna, considering the fans of the saints have already had enough taken from them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SkinsFan#1 Posted September 7, 2005 Share Posted September 7, 2005 I think they should stay in louisiana as well. Maybe the state can rally behind them Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spaceman Spiff Posted September 7, 2005 Share Posted September 7, 2005 san antonio, they've already given a promise for sellouts in every game. And honestly, texas is crazy about football, no doubt in my mind they'd get it done, either. I don't think Vegas is the place (do they even have a pro level field?) Plus you know the NFL is touchy about all things gambling related, although they turn a blind eye to it.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zoony Posted September 7, 2005 Share Posted September 7, 2005 Nowhere dammit. The Saints belong in New Orleans. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest sith lord Posted September 7, 2005 Share Posted September 7, 2005 I said Las Vegas. But I'd rather they stayed in Lousiana. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spaceman Spiff Posted September 7, 2005 Share Posted September 7, 2005 Nowhere dammit. The Saints belong in New Orleans. Haha, and where are they gonna play? I'm kidding, I think they should move back once they rebuild and get stuff straightened up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TimFolk Posted September 7, 2005 Share Posted September 7, 2005 I say L.A. It's win-win situation for the NFL and Tom Benson. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Disco Dave Posted September 7, 2005 Share Posted September 7, 2005 I heard on a TV show the other day that the Saints are subsidized by the state of Louisiana. The state won't have enough money for the team and the team will have to find a new home. Louisiana now has more important things to spend its money on. Send the team to L.A. they have to change the name to something else. Then New Orleans can still own the name "Saints". This will allow New Orleans to be able to use the name again way down the road, if they are able to get a team again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SonnyRules Posted September 7, 2005 Share Posted September 7, 2005 I'd say Baton Rouge....the Saints belong in Louisianna. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zoony Posted September 7, 2005 Share Posted September 7, 2005 Haha, and where are they gonna play? I'm kidding, I think they should move back once they rebuild and get stuff straightened up. you gotta admit... that would be one helluva homefield advantage. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChocolateCitySkin Posted September 7, 2005 Share Posted September 7, 2005 Mexico City!!!! Woot Woot!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thito_da_skins_fan Posted September 7, 2005 Share Posted September 7, 2005 To be honest, I could care less. I wouldn't mind Vegas though, because A) I could see the Redskins when they play here and I could see other teams play when the Redskins aren't playing. But it really makes no difference to me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
twa Posted September 7, 2005 Share Posted September 7, 2005 I heard on a TV show the other day that the Saints are subsidized by the state of Louisiana. The state won't have enough money for the team and the team will have to find a new home. Louisiana now has more important things to spend its money on. Send the team to L.A. they have to change the name to something else. Then New Orleans can still own the name "Saints". This will allow New Orleans to be able to use the name again way down the road, if they are able to get a team again. Benson is paid 25 million a year to keep them there from what I read. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Renegade7 Posted September 8, 2005 Share Posted September 8, 2005 The Las Vegas Saints has a catchy, ironic ring to it, don't ya think? :laugh: Seriously, New Orleans has lost enough already. Atleast keep the team in Louisiana. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kevin West Posted September 8, 2005 Share Posted September 8, 2005 I think the Saints were headed to LA, regardless of Katrina. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
twa Posted September 8, 2005 Share Posted September 8, 2005 I think the Saints were headed to LA, regardless of Katrina. Benson has been trying to leave for years. LA is welcome to him imo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pR0JEkT 21 Posted September 8, 2005 Author Share Posted September 8, 2005 Mexico City!!!! Woot Woot!!! Oh no, please not Mexico City for the love of god at least keep the team in the states! I picked Las Vegas, but if they dont come here its ok as long as its in the states somewhere. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JimboDaMan Posted September 8, 2005 Share Posted September 8, 2005 Benson has been trying to leave for years.LA is welcome to him imo. I thought it was San Antonio he'd been flirting with for years. Regardless, realistically it will be almost impossible to stay in NO. Even if the Superdome can be saved it will take a lot of reconstruction, and will carry bad memories forever. And who will go to the games? It will be years (if ever) before there is a city-sized population back in the area, esp one with disposable cash for football games. In the meantime they have to play someplace, and if its clear this is only temporary you won't get much of a crowd at the games. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SKINS@THEGOALLINE Posted September 8, 2005 Share Posted September 8, 2005 How about Vatican City? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SkinsNorth Posted September 8, 2005 Share Posted September 8, 2005 Toronto would be cool Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jrocrb96 Posted September 12, 2005 Share Posted September 12, 2005 Baton Rouge or Los Angeles. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.