RAC Posted July 14, 2005 Share Posted July 14, 2005 I'm out at EA's Redwood City, CA HQ for an event today and tomorrow and have had a lot of time with the game. I took the time today to write down the Skins overall player ratings and all of the formations in their offensive playbook. Enjoy. Ramsey 83 Brunell 80 Campbell 78 Portis 92 Betts 78 Cartwright 76 Sellers 80 Moss 87 Gardner 84 Patten 82 Jacobs 76 McCants 74 Thrash 73 Cooley 79 Royal 76 baber 62 Samuels 92 Molinaro 63 R. Brown 80 Doclery 75 Rabach 85 Raymer 80 R. Thomas 92 Albright 50 Jansen 91 M. Wilson 64 R. Wynn 81 Boschetti 60 Daniels 83 D. Evans 69 Griffin 88 Noble 78 Salave'a 71 M. Washington 92 Clemons 73 K. Campbell 62 Barrow 85 L. Marshall 80 R. McCune 68 Arrington 95 Holdman 86 B. Allen 71 Springs 87 Harris 81 Rogers 80 Wilds 70 Jimoh 64 S. Taylor 91 Prioleau 85 Lott 71 Bowen 83 Clark 78 Hall 81 Tupa 87 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Parlett316 Posted July 14, 2005 Share Posted July 14, 2005 Wow. Griffin and Springs are low, Portis took a hit as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RAC Posted July 14, 2005 Author Share Posted July 14, 2005 Offensive Formations- Their playbook is awesome btw.. Singleback- Big Singleback- Twin WR Singleback- Twin TE Singleback- Twin TE WR Singleback- Big TE Flip Singleback- Deuce Wing Singleback- Big Jumbo Wing Singleback- Normal TE Flip Singleback- Strg TE Flip Singleback- Trips Bunch Singleback- Stack Doubles-Wk Singleback- 4WR Stack Singleback- 4 WR Spread Singleback- Trips WR I form- Close I form- WR I form- Twin TE Full House- Normal Wide Split Backs- 3 WR Strong I- H Twin TE Weak I- H Wing TE Weak I- H Twin TE Goalline Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spaceman Spiff Posted July 14, 2005 Share Posted July 14, 2005 I haven't even read the whole thing but i just saw that brunell was rated an 80 and just about threw up in my mouth. what bull****. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mooka Posted July 14, 2005 Share Posted July 14, 2005 <---------------- Redwood City what ru doin in my neck of the woods? love the EA HQ; seems like a great place to work. I play basketball up there almost daily. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aejm1400 Posted July 14, 2005 Share Posted July 14, 2005 You know, for some reason every year the Skins players get some low ratings, especially in the overall department. I think they had a 74 on D. I think this has to do with the fact that Madden loves everything Dallas and he worked it in that the Skins stats are always lower than should be. But, after the first online update they should be rated correctly. That's what happened the last few years. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MeNoRevs Posted July 14, 2005 Share Posted July 14, 2005 Originally posted by aejm1400 You know, for some reason every year the Skins players get some low ratings, especially in the overall department. I think they had a 74 on D. I think this has to do with the fact that Madden loves everything Dallas and he worked it in that the Skins stats are always lower than should be. But, after the first online update they should be rated correctly. That's what happened the last few years. Because there is such a media bias against us?Our good players have good ratings. There are some RB's that are better then Portis so they deserve higher then a 92. Do you really expect us to have everyone in the upper 80's, low 90's? we where 6-10 last year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
QBkilla56 Posted July 14, 2005 Share Posted July 14, 2005 Originally posted by Spaceman Spiff I haven't even read the whole thing but i just saw that brunell was rated an 80 and just about threw up in my mouth. what bull****. And so have I. So man of our players have taken a hit including LA b/c he didn't play last season. But a 91 for Sean Taylor is awesome. I can't wait to for this game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Major Harris Posted July 14, 2005 Share Posted July 14, 2005 campbell a 78? that's high for a rookie qb, almost high enough that i'll put him in and see what i can do w/ him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mooby Posted July 14, 2005 Share Posted July 14, 2005 thanks rac, that's awesome, im happy with the redskins ratings and all, hopefully after the first update they get some more right. i think griffin and springs should be higher though, and cooley should be in the low 80's. other than that they are good, but i would make brunell a 78 too. hey rac, one more question. im a skins fan but im curious to see, what are the ratings for antonio pierce, fred smoot, and lavernues coles? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
G-Prime Posted July 14, 2005 Share Posted July 14, 2005 I expected Cooley to be a bit higher as well. .That's kinda gimp Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stupidsuck Posted July 14, 2005 Share Posted July 14, 2005 wow, look at prioleau. THat's a high rating for a special teamer Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vegas-Born Posted July 14, 2005 Share Posted July 14, 2005 Seems about right--sure a few could go up or down.. We could argue that springs and griffin should be higher, but Lavar is till mid 90's. But Where's the shotgun? Someone call EA sports and reoprt that Joe is going to tinker with the shotgun. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RAC Posted July 14, 2005 Author Share Posted July 14, 2005 Originally posted by Mooka <---------------- Redwood City what ru doin in my neck of the woods? love the EA HQ; seems like a great place to work. I play basketball up there almost daily. We're out here for EA's Hot Summer Night event tonight where they will be a showing a lot of their games off. They flew in a bunch of guys who run Madden fan sites yesterday before the event so we could check out the final build of the Madden game. I played a few games with the Skins yesterday. Despite a few ratings that weren't necessarily on the mark, the defense was pretty dominant. I had a few user picks with Sean Taylor and dominated someone who tried to use Dallas against me. I think you guys will be pretty happy with how they play as a team in the game this year. :wewantd: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RAC Posted July 14, 2005 Author Share Posted July 14, 2005 Originally posted by dviands campbell a 78? that's high for a rookie qb, almost high enough that i'll put him in and see what i can do w/ him. I used Ramsey yesterday, but I think I may give Campbell a shot today to see how he is. Ramsey's vision cone in the game isn't too great so it can't be too much worse for Campbell. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SkinsForLife260 Posted July 14, 2005 Share Posted July 14, 2005 Thanks for doing this. -------- Do you feel as the gameplay is improved this year. Like getting picks and just more real stuff or what? Also how is running. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
refuze Posted July 14, 2005 Share Posted July 14, 2005 We don't have any Shotgun formations? Boo.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
laurent Posted July 14, 2005 Share Posted July 14, 2005 Those ratings look better than I had anticipated. Nothing out of this world of course but good enough to be competitive with them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VaBeachSkinzFan Posted July 14, 2005 Share Posted July 14, 2005 Originally posted by stupidsuck wow, look at prioleau. THat's a high rating for a special teamer Yeah I was surprised at how high he is rated. I mean I knew he was a decent player but I didn't know he was that good. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Truant Posted July 14, 2005 Share Posted July 14, 2005 Nothing tragic... other than gamers are forced to play madden this year. Brunell's rating is disgusting, almost as absurd as Griffin's. The lack of a shotgun will also bite quite a bit. What's really sad is that the Dockery rating is probably pretty accurate. :doh: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flexxskins Posted July 14, 2005 Share Posted July 14, 2005 Was Dockery really that bad? They have Holdman being better than Barrow, hmmmm interesting. Shawn Taylor is a straight up beast at 91 in his second year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trickydog Posted July 14, 2005 Share Posted July 14, 2005 ESPN NFL 2K5 > Any Madden game ever. I still can't believe EA has teh monopoly... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nuwanda Posted July 14, 2005 Share Posted July 14, 2005 only 71ovr for salavea??? :doh: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aejm1400 Posted July 14, 2005 Share Posted July 14, 2005 Originally posted by MeNoRevs Because there is such a media bias against us? Our good players have good ratings. There are some RB's that are better then Portis so they deserve higher then a 92. Do you really expect us to have everyone in the upper 80's, low 90's? we where 6-10 last year. No, I wasn't expecting all 80's and 90's, but I was expecting a high 80-90 for team D rating. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nuwanda Posted July 14, 2005 Share Posted July 14, 2005 well pierce (~85ovr) and smoot (~85-90ovr) are gone Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.