CousinsCowgirl84

That explains why it didn’t work 🤷‍♀️

History was whitewashed when the statues were built. Removing them is simply correcting that whitewashing.

hmm. I wonder if that’s why Musk decided to disband the supercharger team. Some kinda owning the libs something… Edited for context:

Can you even buy manufactured meat yet?

It’s a shame the world is full of people who act like the failure of the first attempt to do something world changing is some kind of indictment of the entire idea. The article appears to say the device itself is still producing useful data. as an aside, how do they take the air out of the brain after brain surgery?

Since when did the mob determine what justice is?

Should we be afraid to do the right thing because of potential backlash?

The arguments aren’t the same. He is saying that American did wrong, therefore we can’t complain when other countries do it. I am saying if we are going to hold countries accountable (which I think we should, if) we should hold them accountable equally. He is right that America has a lot of blood on it’s hands. He is wrong to use it justify Russians actions, not chiefly because it is morally wrong, but because it against the interests of the United States.🇺🇸

Some are offensive weapons and some are defensive. I think he is specifically not sending the weapons that cause large widespread destruction. But, of course it is mainly a political statement. Which is the first thing to do.

Hamas isn’t a country. Neither is Palestine for that matter. I’m all for bringing leaders of countries who commit war crimes to the ICC but there are many leaders that have done far more unprovoked that should be brought up on charges first if that is the route we are taking. Which is why I specifically listed countries that should have their leaders charged in front of Israel. They’ve done worse things.

No more special dispensation than any other country.

Just file a chargeback and move on with your life!

That certainly is the most damming evidence we know about. Tesla better get ready to pay some fines. Musk should have stayed out of politics. All these lawsuits as soon as he started being a conservative barking dog OUT LOUD just shows you how our legal system works. I don’t think the legal proceedings are unfair or the accusations necessarily untrue, but there is pretty strong correlation between Tesla’s legal problems and his Twitter quagmire.

It depends on what they said about it internally. Eg, if outwardly they were saying 2017 but internally they thought 2025, that would be fraud. But if they were saying it internally and outwardly then fraud is much harder to prove. Being wrong isnt fraud.

Yall really thought a dude that drives a Doritos shaped ev would be great at off-roading? This looks like the bod of 4x4 prowess? Edit: or wait…. Do yall think any f150 can just roll up on some sand without any preparation and not get stuck? Let me introduce you to Corolla Beach Idiots https://m.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100057491767631

Your first responsibility is to the security of your country, not international law. Yea, that’s what I said. well, perhaps he is first in line after the ect. The ect was there for you to add your favorite war criminal.

It’s a more complicated question than your gotcha question implies. Ultimately I think leaders who commit war crimes should be prosecuted. But Israel’s leaders are government officials. Hamas leaders are not. So that does give them greater authority to act in defense of their state. I supposed if the ICC is willing to round up the leaders of Hamas, the ayatollah in Iran, Xi in China, your American president of choice, ect then after all those people get their fair trial we can work our way down the list to Israel.

Egypt doesn’t want a war at their border. But refugees pouring across their border would probably require a military response from Egypt for the reasons the article I posted this morning mentioned. They asked Israel not to do it because they don’t want a war at their border, and this is a step in that direction. So it doesn’t make them happy. But Israel is trying to avoid forcing Egypt’s hand. That literally happens all the time.

No where did I say Egypt was happy. I said the opposite actually in a follow up post. What I did say was Israel was trying to belay Egypts fears of a migrant crisis. You can comprehend the difference between the two statements? I never said it was changed at the last minute. That is something you made up in your own head. No, I don’t think they will.

No, I didn’t. Could you quote me where I said that? No, I said they should go into Rafah and they should do it responsibly by setting up evacuation zones and humanitarian corridors, which they haven’t done. Perhaps I haven’t said it in every single post I made about Rafah, but if you go through the posts my opinion on Israel’s actions are clear. Of course, my position is that Israel shouldn’t agree to a permanent cease fire without going into rafah unless Hamas leadership surrenders. The state department said as much. Now, last minute? No. Neither sides position changed. The deal that Hamas accepted wasn’t the deal that Israel offered. The deal that Israel would accept wasn’t the deal that Hamas Offered.

I don’t insist on anything. I am. You were choosing to put all of the blame on Israel. Then when you were presented with evidence that refutes your position you decided it doesn’t matter. That IS the kind of antisemitic undercurrent that flows through any discussion about Israel’s actions. Having a fact based discussion is important to me.

Why do you think your sources are more valid (or at least as valid) the state department. Your sources appear to be Hamas’ word.

It’s not a tweet. It’s a statement from the state department. Read it. It’s like you quoted me without reading anything. Are you saying facts don’t matter?