Sacks 'n' Stuff

Correct

Well this is some Nazi **** right here. I hope that people paying attention would know that I'm not one who is prone to exaggeration or hyperbole.

I'm not sure what you're specifically talking about but I'm guessing a good response would be "How 'bout that Republican Party?"

1. You're suggesting that they moved OFF of Obama. You know that isn't true. 2. There were multiple politicians making such promises. There's something special about Trump. 3. There's going to come a point really soon where you will say enough is enough.

I love naps.

I couldn't agree more.

For real. What the **** is that all about?

I'm tempted to enter her dark side.

I know another lightsaber that is calling out to her. When she finally touches and embraces it, the force and a lot more will be awakened.

Rey is pretty hot.

You'll always come crawling back to your homoerotic master.

Oh yeah... Forgot about that piece of crap. Magic ticket my ass, McBain!

Movies titled The Last ____ are always good.

You guys who are arguing with twa just don't get it. edit: not that there's anything wrong with that.

Never heard of the guy before but his Wikipedia page indicates that he believes climate change is real and man made. He doubts the catastrophic predictions of other scientists and thinks that being unnecessarily concerned to the point of over regulating will do a great deal of damage to the economy and little good for the environment. We may be approaching an intelligent argument on the opposing view's side here.

Ain't.... Gonna.... Happen!

Oh good, @btfoom is making another appearance in the climate change thread. I'm quoting him and tagging him so that there will be no confusion as to whether or not he sees this 27th request to address my theory that he has no experience or expertise in this field as he likes to claim. Tell me @btfoom, how accurate is my assessment that, when you say you understand the science because of your work, you are actually pulling **** out of your ass? That at the very most, you have done work for an agency, company, or organization that specializes in this field but that your work had nothing to do with the actual science? And for bonus points, I'll guess that based on your level and style of B.S. that your work is actually something either in upper-level management or, more likely, litigious. Possibly financial but not just record keeping or accounting... it would also have to have some sort of background in law.

Potential grizzlies...

This has got to be in the running for most absurd debate in human history.

No they didn't. GoP told me so. ^ It really is a bizarre behavior. I bet Jumbo would have something to say about it.

He had not been doing well for some time. His mind was pretty much gone. He killed a girl once, you know.

Some of that **** had to hurt. Do those dudes wrestle like that all the time? They will be crippled soon.

^ That shouldn't have been a penalty. Ball was uncatchable.

Still have a gun problem in the U.S.? Still impossible to even attempt to have an intelligent conversation without intentional obfuscation? Still impossible for our government leaders to say, "We, the United States of America, recognize that there is a gun problem in our country and that way too many citizens are dying unnecessarily every year. We are going to fund a study on gun violence, look at the data, and consider common sense restrictions, laws, or regulations that could save lives without impeding on an individual's rights to collect, hunt, own a gun for protection, or any other lawful use." because the NRA would use their political clout to block any such study? Carry on then.

1. True. That isn't what makes them wrong. 2. No ****. I will be absolutely 100% specific next time so that you don't have to pretend like you don't know what I meant.