Sacks 'n' Stuff

1. True. That isn't what makes them wrong. 2. No ****. I will be absolutely 100% specific next time so that you don't have to pretend like you don't know what I meant.

1. I understand that. Doesn't make them right. 2. I do not. Do you deny that we could easily get an unbiased study done, that because one group was unabashedly biased in the past is a bad excuse not to, and that there are almost certainly some sensical changes that would come out of it that would save lives?

I'm not going to argue about this. The NRA has used and continues to use its political clout to block research on gun violence. Not up for debate.The reason is because they want to sell more guns. I have no problem with gun owners. The NRA are not the "good guys with guns" though. I don't want any particular results for a study. I would just like to know so that we can make informed decisions on what will make Americans more safe. If the study comes back and says everybody over the age of 11 should own 30 guns, I'd be for it. If it says nobody should own any guns at all, that would be cool with me as well. Being not a total dummy, I'm pretty sure that neither of those is the case but that there are some very simple, common sense measures to be taken that would save a bunch of lives and would not impede on anyone's rights. Probably wouldn't affect gun sales either except that they triple whenever the NRA scares people into believing that the tyrants are coming for their 2nd amendment.

We're allowed to study it all we want except not at all and here's the reason we're giving as to why which sounds better than the real reason why.

Lots of extreme views in this thread on both sides. Therein lies the problem. There is a 100% chance that there are some common sense laws or regulations that would save lives without impeding on people's abilities to hunt or collect or protect their home.

America still got a gun problem? Still not allowed to even study it? Very well. Carry on then.

3x as long as Ronda Rousey. But I digress. I wanted to say that, while the guy needs some work, Braun Strohmen (sp?) is one huge mother****er. A retarded baboon could book him to the world championship as a monster heel.

I know just the manager to help her get her life & career back on the right track.

Hard to say. In both fights, all her preparation went out the window as soon as she got tagged in the face once.

Cash in with WWE, action movies, & putting her name on a bunch of merchandise and enjoy the next 70 years of her life. No more fighting.

Thaaaaaaaaat's not what she needs. What she needs is to never fight again because if she does, she is going to get punched in the face many, many times... HARD!! Her standup is like Robert Griffin's pocket presence. I can't bare to watch the suffering any longer.

If Neville were 4 inches taller, he'd be a future world champion.

Just read up on this. Seems dumb. I watched him get sliced in half and fall 5 million feet. Seems like that would be difficult to survive. Makes me glad that Tyranus wasn't more popular. Not sure I could stomach a storyline where he survived the beheading and somebody just hooked him up with a robotic neck, torso, arms, & legs so that he could carry on about his business.

Kyle Shanahan is closer to being our guy than Robert is.

Absolutely. I'm one of them. In the sense that I don't wish him any specific harm, at least.

The guy has no idea how to operate in the pocket and takes a lot of sacks because of it. This is not up for debate.

Couple of acoustic covers from unknown / lesser known artists. The 2nd one is really quite great.

One time I was watching Gilligan's Island with my roommate in college (we were pretty high). In this episode, the Harlem Globetrotters somehow get shipwrecked on the same island as the other castaways. I can't remember exactly how the story unfolds (we were pretty high) but they end up playing a charity basketball game for some reason. So anyway, one of the Globetrotters gets hurt and they have no subs so Gilligan ends up going into the game. My roommate goes, "Oh yeah, right. Like Gilligan is really going to play." and I'm thinking, "You're ok with everything else that's happened here up to this point?"

There were no Jedi in episode Vii for them to talk to?

1. Please explain. Also, what precisely is your expertise in this field? 2. Read several stories about it. Sounds like some slimey politics. It proves nothing about climate change though. The scientist who was fired wasn't talking about climate change at all. She was presenting on the effects of small doses of radiation to humans. The only connection was that her program was competing for funding with Obama's climate initiatives.

I'm worried about Mick Foley. Every week he forgets something or says the wrong thing or stammers nonsensically. Today he delivered his "right here, in Pittsburgh, PA" trademark cheap pop line. Problem is they weren't in Pittsburgh. I'm think the CTE might be setting in.

TWA's 4th grade science fair project was not well received.

Let's suppose that global warming is a hoax (it's not). What does that mean? Deregulate? Pollute away?

I've asked you this once before but could you give a little more detail about your job, then?