Oldskool Posted April 7, 2011 Share Posted April 7, 2011 http://www.stltoday.com/sports/football/professional/article_0e54d038-5fc6-11e0-85e5-001a4bcf6878.html DDavid: Hey Jim, looking at the latest mocks it seems that the Redskins are slowly checking out Jake Locker from the other side of the "party". Here's hoping they jump on him and push JJones to the Rams. Are Quinn & Bowers that good where teams can overlook them being damaged goods? Thanks. Jim Thomas: For what it's worth, I talked to an agent this week who has some dealings with the Redskins who said he was told the 'Skins wanted to go quarterback or wide receiver at No. 10, depending on who was there. From a Rams standpoint, the more QBs and offensive tackles taken in the top 13 the better. I think Quinn and Bowers might drop some because of their issues. All the way to the Rams? Don't think so, but..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coolio47 Posted April 7, 2011 Share Posted April 7, 2011 I've said it before and I'll say it again. Trying to figure out Shanny's plans for the draft is a giant mind****. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GibbsFactor Posted April 7, 2011 Share Posted April 7, 2011 Either misinformation or hope it will be taken that way. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedskinsTime Posted April 7, 2011 Share Posted April 7, 2011 Not happenin'. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SMU Redskin Posted April 7, 2011 Share Posted April 7, 2011 Very tough to determine what Shanny will do in the draft. Remember, he never even worked Cutler out when he drafted him. All along I've though we were going to take a QB with one of our first two picks, but now I'm not so sure. Perhaps the plan is to shore up our 3-4 defense or add a top flight WR this year and address the o-line, sign a free agent QB (think Bulger or VY) to "compete" for one season, and then make a play for one of the QBs next year- Luck, Barkley (if he declares), etc. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dukes and Skins Posted April 7, 2011 Share Posted April 7, 2011 Funny that the STL Today is saying that when they are the one who many feel will be moving up for Julio Jones Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
terrifNick21 Posted April 7, 2011 Share Posted April 7, 2011 :ols: :rotflmao: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
@DCGoldPants Posted April 7, 2011 Share Posted April 7, 2011 If only one WR is on the board at 10. You better be talking to St. Louis about a potential trade. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SMU Redskin Posted April 7, 2011 Share Posted April 7, 2011 If only one WR is on the board at 10. You better be talking to St. Louis about a potential trade. I agree completely. Trade back to 14, get a 3rd rounder. Maybe even move again from 14 to 17 (NE) or farther back. This team needs all the draft picks it can get. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
@DCGoldPants Posted April 7, 2011 Share Posted April 7, 2011 I agree completely. Trade back to 14, get a 3rd rounder. Maybe even move again from 14 to 17 (NE) or farther back. This team needs all the draft picks it can get. exactly. We can get a DL later in the 1st and if we want a WR or QB, the 2nd tier will be there in the 2nd round. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GibbsFactor Posted April 7, 2011 Share Posted April 7, 2011 If only one WR is on the board at 10. You better be talking to St. Louis about a potential trade. Wouldn't they trade with the Cowboys to keep Jones from us? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
@DCGoldPants Posted April 7, 2011 Share Posted April 7, 2011 Wouldn't they trade with the Cowboys to keep Jones from us? Wouldn't it cost more to trade into #9 than #10? Especially when you know the Skins are willing to trade down. Dallas badly needs a CB and OT, both who might be there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Newera Posted April 7, 2011 Share Posted April 7, 2011 Shanny always plays it close to the vest. Or is the master of mis-direction. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DarrellsMyHero28 Posted April 7, 2011 Share Posted April 7, 2011 This is bull****. No way we take a QB at 10. Gabbert is the only guy that's POSSIBLY worth a 10 and he won't be there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Enter Apotheosis Posted April 7, 2011 Share Posted April 7, 2011 This is bull****.No way we take a QB at 10. Gabbert is the only guy that's POSSIBLY worth a 10 and he won't be there. Of course it's bull****... but does it really hurt us if other teams believe we're in competition for positions we don't believe hold value at #10? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hitmandm Posted April 7, 2011 Share Posted April 7, 2011 http://www.stltoday.com/sports/football/professional/article_0e54d038-5fc6-11e0-85e5-001a4bcf6878.htmlDDavid: Hey Jim, looking at the latest mocks it seems that the Redskins are slowly checking out Jake Locker from the other side of the "party". Here's hoping they jump on him and push JJones to the Rams. Are Quinn & Bowers that good where teams can overlook them being damaged goods? Thanks. Jim Thomas: For what it's worth, I talked to an agent this week who has some dealings with the Redskins who said he was told the 'Skins wanted to go quarterback or wide receiver at No. 10, depending on who was there. From a Rams standpoint, the more QBs and offensive tackles taken in the top 13 the better. I think Quinn and Bowers might drop some because of their issues. All the way to the Rams? Don't think so, but..... I think its clear that the Shannys target and draft a QB in the first round. Whether thats at 10 or by moving down from 10 or trading up from 41. Just please, don't draft Newton. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
superozman Posted April 7, 2011 Share Posted April 7, 2011 I heard from my mother's brother's sister's cousin's aunt tooo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DarrellsMyHero28 Posted April 7, 2011 Share Posted April 7, 2011 Of course it's bull****... but does it really hurt us if other teams believe we're in competition for positions we don't believe hold value at #10? I don't believe that any teams GM's are dumb enough to believe this but no, it wouldn't hurt. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rutliff381 Posted April 7, 2011 Share Posted April 7, 2011 Does anyone know what players we have met with recently or have scheduled to meet with in the coming week or so. I know that doesn't mean much. Just curious. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
washedup2 Posted April 7, 2011 Share Posted April 7, 2011 we will trade back to later in the first round for an additional pick...then we will draft Locker. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Diesel__44 Posted April 7, 2011 Share Posted April 7, 2011 Wouldn't it cost more to trade into #9 than #10? Especially when you know the Skins are willing to trade down. Dallas badly needs a CB and OT, both who might be there. Dallas also needs a 5 tech and could be interested in Watt or Jordan at #14. The cowboys are no threat to take a WR so it would make sense for the Rams to wait until we're on the clock and see if either JJ or AJ is there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
#98QBKiller Posted April 7, 2011 Share Posted April 7, 2011 We'll take the BPA out of Gabbert, Mallett, Miller, Green, and Jones. I've had this hunch for months. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DarrellsMyHero28 Posted April 7, 2011 Share Posted April 7, 2011 We'll take the BPA out of Gabbert, Mallett, Miller, Green, and Jones. I've had this hunch for months. I'd take out Mallett and add Quinn to that list. I'll be furious if we take Mallett at #10. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skinsinparadise Posted April 7, 2011 Share Posted April 7, 2011 Shanny is the same guy who didn't want to tell McNabb they he isn't starting until if I recall Thursday of game week, in fear that it would leak out. He seemed obsessed with getting an advantage over the opposition via subterfuge so yeah gabbing about who they are taking in the draft seems unlikely to me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Audible_Red40 Posted April 7, 2011 Share Posted April 7, 2011 http://www.stltoday.com/sports/football/professional/article_0e54d038-5fc6-11e0-85e5-001a4bcf6878.htmlJim Thomas: For what it's worth, ..... Ain't worth a thing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.