superozman

Members
  • Content Count

    1,954
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About superozman

  • Rank
    The Rookie
  • Birthday 11/01/1983

Contact Methods

  • Website URL
    http://

Profile Information

  • Birthdate
    11/1/1983
  • Redskins Fan Since
    birth
  • Favorite Redskin
    Clinton Portis
  • Not a Skins Fan? Tell us YOUR team:
    N/A
  • Location
    Norwood, PA
  • Zip Code
    19074
  • Interests
    Sports, Sports Cards, Sports Games
  • Occupation
    Mortgage Manager

Recent Profile Visitors

2,081 profile views
  1. Congrats @Cooleyfan1993! while my red and blue will be different, and hated, at least i know it's not @Riggo#44 in charge of my guest experience. I'll be out on the street in no time! LOL GL this seasons as always. Although not until the end of may when the Nats come to Philly will this division rivalry kick off!
  2. superozman

    Winter weather thread: 2019-2020 edition

    Philadelphia currently sits at .30" for the season, which ranks 3rd lowest snow totals: 1884-85 - .00" 1972-73 - .00" 2019-20 - .30"
  3. Stupid question - but educational purposes for me: With Yang out for the Democratic nomination, could he turn around and run independent? My assumption is it would not be worthwhile in any way, but wasn't sure how past independents really came to any sort of popularity. He has a unique platform and a cult following, which I would guess are 2 of the key things you need.
  4. superozman

    Favorite songs from the 90s?

    Holy crap. it's the decade I got into music, I can name so many. But I'll go with the most influential on my musical ear that Instantly come to mind: 1st of tha Month - BTNH Waterfalls - TLC Dammit - Blink Days of our Livez - BTNH My Name Is - Eminem Victory - Notorious/Puff One Sweet Day - MC Overall Blink & Bone Thugs
  5. Awesome career, and awesome veteran presence and solid numbers as a #2 tight end here in DC. Man I thought his TD vs the Eagles was going to be a sign for something awesome last year. But oh well. Still one of the best individual efforts by a Skins player in recent memory. Enjoy retirement and knowing you play 14 years of elite football!
  6. Always interested to go back and look at weaknesses and see if 1) scouts were wrong 2) maybe scouts were right but someone worked on something and 3) what still exists Weaknesses - NFL.com Scouting Has build-up speed, but lacks early acceleration - That post route vs Philly tho... Body catcher with below-average extension and high-pointing He still body catches, anything that he doesn't need to extend his arms it's in the body on a catch. Will need to intensify pace of his routes as a pro Accomplished this i think Long strides hinder short-area work underneath Accomplished this i think Lacks suddenness to separate from tight man Visually its not a huge concern? But Next Gen stats show him EXTREMELY Low (only golladay worse) on separation. Not good for a speedster. Below-average blocker and willingness to do so Put this to bed - sincerely, AP Doesn't create yards after catch with wiggle and needs it in stride I haven't seen this yet either. Comes in hot and runs by special teams tackles N/A
  7. Here is the worst case scenario with this: Computer won't work for some reason. Then regular ump has to ump game. Game is protested. LOL
  8. superozman

    Random "Thot" Thread (Stadium Edition)

    Hahaha. I'm glad it was appreciated! It was the first thing to come to mind when I read that!!!
  9. Moreau/Dunbar/Fuller would be phenomanal. Sign me up! Moreau has proved he's an outside guy. Fuller was a beast in the slot, and IMO Dunny was a pro-bowl alt snub...if that's even a thing. Well, it is a thing, I just made it up if it's not.
  10. superozman

    Should the Skins Sit Haskins?

    Mr. Veretax, what you've just said...is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever read. At no point, in your rambling, incoherent post, were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having read it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul.
  11. superozman

    Will Peterson and/or McLaurin reach 1,000 yards?

    Update: Adrian Peterson (AKA Will Peterson thanks to my poor title): 784 yards, 216 left. Giants have averaged allowing 115.1 rushing yards per game. Dallas has allowed 103.6 rushing yards per game. Vs Giants week 4, 11 carries 28 yards. Vs Cowboys week 2, 10 carries 25 yards (Gruden effect...). CONTRACT BONUS AT 1,000 ($500,000). Terry McLaurin - 833 yards, 167 left. Giants have averaged allowing 261.8, Dallas has averaged 220. However, both in the past 3 have averaged giving up more, 268 and 243 respectively. Vs Giants week 4 inactive, Vs. Cowpukes week 2: 5 for 62.
  12. superozman

    The Impeachment Thread

    My understanding is yes, it's it for today. The next step will be the full House vote on the impeachment to send to Senate, and I that is next week (early next week is what I thought i read was the goal). https://news.yahoo.com/house-judiciary-committee-vote-impeachment-080004682.html "Both articles of impeachment now head to the full House of Representatives. That vote could come as early as next week." Edit for article
  13. superozman

    The Impeachment Thread

    Trump makes up a ton of stuff. . But how do you feel about the precedent it sets? That if you force congress to go to the 3rd branch before you do something, it's automatically obstruction of congress? To my knowledge many presidents have done this, but for Trump, it's "Obstruction of Congress"?
  14. superozman

    The Impeachment Thread

    I literally shared what Nadler STATED HIMSELF, I don't go to google every ****ing statement. So thanks for the snarky response, but truly thanks for sharing information. This is LITERALLY why i have the conversation. I would have taken Nadler's statement as true. But the funny thing is, this reverts to my original point. If it's actually going through the process, then it's not obstruction. If the court rules these poeple have to testify, then they have to testify and if Trump orders them not to then it's obstruction (Lawyers have stated this). And in the end, if these people have anything to say that truly implicates the president, hello Mike Pence, and next Jan for certain hello (insert Dem here). In the Nixon hearings, the supreme court ordered him to comply (they went to the judicial branch and got a result) prior to voting on the articles of impeachment.