Jethrodsp Posted April 22, 2010 Share Posted April 22, 2010 Should we be T.gO. or is it T.nO. No speculation here, do you want Terrell Owens on the Redskins or not? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skinnyfan57 Posted April 22, 2010 Share Posted April 22, 2010 I voted... well nothing since there is no poll. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zCommander Posted April 22, 2010 Share Posted April 22, 2010 Hmmmmm....same question they had on 107 the Fan show earlier today. TO said he can help McNabb and the Skins get to the SB. I think we should get him and then take our money back if he is not able to do that this year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HeHateMe Posted April 22, 2010 Share Posted April 22, 2010 The poll results would be a lot different if/when Washington does sign T.O. I wish there was a poll for wanting McNabb as the Redskins QB before there was anything out there that he was on the block. Would have like to have seen the results of that one then and now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HeHateMe Posted April 22, 2010 Share Posted April 22, 2010 Apologies. Double post. Disregard. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cocojoey Posted April 22, 2010 Share Posted April 22, 2010 T O is not going to be a skin so this is a wasted vote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LetThePointsSoar Posted April 22, 2010 Share Posted April 22, 2010 Ummm...can we add a "Hell NO" option? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[[ghost]] Posted April 22, 2010 Share Posted April 22, 2010 T O is not going to be a skin so this is a wasted vote If anyone would know, it would be you, Coco Joey. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rdskn4Lyf21 Posted April 22, 2010 Share Posted April 22, 2010 The ninjas are skewing the vote. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jayneal7 Posted April 22, 2010 Share Posted April 22, 2010 you forgot option 3....HEEEEEELLLLLLLLL NNNNOOOOOOOO!!!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
grhqofb5 Posted April 22, 2010 Share Posted April 22, 2010 If we get TO, I think we should also pick up Art Schlicter as an "insurance policy" for McNabb. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mmzznnxx Posted April 22, 2010 Share Posted April 22, 2010 I actually don't dislike Owens, I think he's kind of grown up and he's still got football in him, he takes great care of himself and Buffalo isn't the most receiver-friendly team in the league, otherwise Lee Evans would be a household name, in my opinion. But still, no, I think the competence of our wide receivers and tight ends will be enough for us this year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Truant Posted April 22, 2010 Share Posted April 22, 2010 The poll results would be a lot different if/when Washington does sign T.O.I wish there was a poll for wanting McNabb as the Redskins QB before there was anything out there that he was on the block. Would have like to have seen the results of that one then and now. When is that not the case? Once something happens people are forced to adapt to the situation. If you turn in your fan card when the team does something that you don't like, you're either not a fan or a Cowboys fan. :evilg: Kidding. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jethrodsp Posted April 22, 2010 Author Share Posted April 22, 2010 Whats up with the ninja votes? How can we prevent this and hold people accountable to their vote? Can guests vote in polls? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
veteranskinsfan Posted April 22, 2010 Share Posted April 22, 2010 We need to instill a culture that focuses on team first and individuals second. T.O. will not fit in with what Shanny and Allen are trying to do with the Skins. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jkypoo Posted April 22, 2010 Share Posted April 22, 2010 I voted no because I do not "want" T.O. on the Redskins roster. But if he ends up there I will not be angry. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
captain_obvious Posted April 22, 2010 Share Posted April 22, 2010 No. A thousand times no. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cowboycrusher Posted April 22, 2010 Share Posted April 22, 2010 Do I want the Skins to sign T.O.? No, not really, but I also think there are only a handful of coaches that can contain his me-first drama, and Shanny is one of them. Could he be productive? Yes, I think so. The real question would be, does anyone on the current roster want him, and would T.O. put the team first? I'm a fan of the "three strikes and you're out" philosophy, especially when dealing with one's character, both on and off the field. Isn't he around strike 7 or 8 now? That's the main reason I'd say no. I know he can still be productive, but Dallas was his last chance to prove he could be a team player and not a cancer. I have no respect for anyone, let alone a million dollar athlete, that can't check their emotions at the door when they get to work for the sake of continuity and productivity. People at McDonald's do this for minimum wage everyday. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LaRonDontLikeUgly Posted April 22, 2010 Share Posted April 22, 2010 The poll results would be a lot different if/when Washington does sign T.O.I wish there was a poll for wanting McNabb as the Redskins QB before there was anything out there that he was on the block. Would have like to have seen the results of that one then and now. I would have liked to see the reactions from fans in general if Vinny was still running the show. Pretty much every move we've made this offseason would be, "Welp, Snyderatto is at it again!" EDIT: And for the record, I'm all about me some T.O in D.C Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Redskins4ever Posted April 22, 2010 Share Posted April 22, 2010 I doubt if the Redskins aquire Terrell Owens. For one, his age. He's 37 years old. He has negative history with McNabb. While Owens is potentially very productive and would absolutely contribute to the betterment of the offense, it's too much of a risk to sign him. I agree with Mike Shanahan. We don't need T.O. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Laxpunk2006 Posted April 22, 2010 Share Posted April 22, 2010 I voted yes. Post Phily, and post Dallas I was against the signing. He was still acting like a twerp and I didn't feel like dealing with him. I think a year in no man's land has humbled him a bit. His stats weren't amazing but he was also playing with revolving trash at the QB position. Not only was the talent poor but there was no chemistry due to all the changes. Their offensive line also rivaled ours in suckiness and thus lead to less deep passes. He still put up decent numbers. He isn't the big play, take over a game type WR anymore but he is productive. He would be a good possession guy opposite of Santana while we continue to ease Thomas/Kelly or even Mitchell into the lineup. If Shanahan (either one) has seen something on film from Thomas/Kelly/Mitchell to lead them to believe they are ready to be big time players or that the playing time they get this year will make them become that then obviously my opinion changes. As of now I think we have some slow developing WR's with a lot of potential but little productivity. No one works harder than Terrel Owens (or talks more) and he could actually be a great influence on our younger WR's. The fact that he is aging and will be fighting for playing time is likely to make him work that much harder. That kind of work ethic rubs off. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NeueRedskinWelle Posted April 22, 2010 Share Posted April 22, 2010 McNabb is different. I can turn around and cheer for him. TO can suck a big one Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thatturkishguy Posted April 22, 2010 Share Posted April 22, 2010 the burgundy and gold is about more then just football. I'd like to think that character has to matter for something when thinking about playing here... that and would he want #81?!? if he takes Monk's number I'd have a friggin stroke. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skinz#28Rules Posted April 22, 2010 Share Posted April 22, 2010 turkishguy, echo everything you say about character when playing here. There's a lot of history playing for the skins and I can't think of too many "Me first" players like T.O. that have played here. I don't know, you can't ever totally give up on someone, like someone else said...I'm sure he was humbled a bit in Buffalo so maybe he'll work his ass off for one last stint. If he does show up I doubt he'll be able to wear a HOF jersey number. Don't they usually retire them? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Teller Posted April 22, 2010 Share Posted April 22, 2010 I said "no," but at the same time, I also know that TO tends to give any employer one good season before commencing to tear the team apart from the inside. And it sure as hell looks to me as if Shanny & Co. are taking a win-now approach. I wouldn't be shocked if TO ends up here. But I don't want him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.