KevinthePRF Posted April 5, 2010 Share Posted April 5, 2010 Do you still draft Bradford, draft someone else? Here's my dream scenario... 1. I'd like a trade down with SF for the 13th and 49th pick this year, and a conditional 3rd, 4th rounder for next year depending on how Bradford pans out for them in 2010. 2. Trade Jason Campbell to the Raiders for the 69th pick. then... 13th-Bruce Campbel(OT)l, Trent Williams(OT), Anthony Davis(OT) 49th-Jason Worilds(DE), Javid Best(RB), Ben Tate(RB), Jared Veldheer(OT) 69th-Jon Asamoah(OG), Jon Jerry(OG), Tim Tebow(QB) Summary, we've rocuoped everything we gave away in the McNaab trade, plus got a third for Campbell who is no longer needed. Essentially we moved from 4 to 13 and picked up a third for acquiring McNaab. Of course, with Okung on the board I would be tempted just to stand pat. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kevincollateral Posted April 5, 2010 Share Posted April 5, 2010 Russellmania09 Just spoke to a high level source...the McNabb trade does NOT 100 % rule out drafting a QB # 4 for #Redskins Russellmania09 The high level source said that if a QB like Sam Bradford were still to be at # 4..it would be a very tough decision #Redskins Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rufus T Firefly Posted April 5, 2010 Share Posted April 5, 2010 if Bradford was there at 4, you take him. Period. He won't be, though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bobzmuda Posted April 5, 2010 Share Posted April 5, 2010 If he's there at 4, you still take Bradford. Then you Aaron Rodgers him for 2-3 years while McNabb plays out his career (probably missing games for injuries). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RiggosMohawk Posted April 5, 2010 Share Posted April 5, 2010 I'd still take Bradford at 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jpyaks3 Posted April 5, 2010 Share Posted April 5, 2010 Why would San Francisco trade that much to move up. They are pretty happy with Smith who looks like he is finally turning the corner and healthy. They are a RT away from winning the NFC West. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wrong Direction Posted April 5, 2010 Share Posted April 5, 2010 If he's there at 4, you let someone overpay to get the pick. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wvtbred Posted April 5, 2010 Share Posted April 5, 2010 Do you still draft Bradford, draft someone else? Here's my dream scenario...1. I'd like a trade down with SF for the 13th and 49th pick this year, and a conditional 3rd, 4th rounder for next year depending on how Bradford pans out for them in 2010. 2. Trade Jason Campbell to the Raiders for the 69th pick. then... 13th-Bruce Campbel(OT)l, Trent Williams(OT), Anthony Davis(OT) 49th-Jason Worilds(DE), Javid Best(RB), Ben Tate(RB), Jared Veldheer(OT) 69th-Jon Asamoah(OG), Jon Jerry(OG), Tim Tebow(QB) Summary, we've rocuoped everything we gave away in the McNaab trade, plus got a third for Campbell who is no longer needed. Essentially we moved from 4 to 13 and picked up a third for acquiring McNaab. Of course, with Okung on the board I would be tempted just to stand pat. Okung not there at 4 and I would be ok with trading down for picks but absolutely NO way we get the 69th for Jason. Maybe for Carter and Jason or just Carter. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KevinthePRF Posted April 5, 2010 Author Share Posted April 5, 2010 Okung not there at 4 and I would be ok with trading down for picks but absolutely NO way we get the 69th for Jason. Maybe for Carter and Jason or just Carter. I will admit that's an optimistic pick to obtain for Jason. I'd count on the fact this is a quarterback hungry league to drive his trade value above his actual value. And I think the Raiders would be the only team silly enough to give something that high away for him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SWFLSkins Posted April 5, 2010 Share Posted April 5, 2010 Don't be surprised, the dealing ain't done, Shanny is still at the table. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KevinthePRF Posted April 5, 2010 Author Share Posted April 5, 2010 Why would San Francisco trade that much to move up. They are pretty happy with Smith who looks like he is finally turning the corner and healthy. They are a RT away from winning the NFC West. I don't know what the exact points cost in relation, but I think it's fair value considering what the Jets gave the Browns to move up and get Sanchez. And if they are truly happy with Smith, (I'm surely not sold on the guy), then fill in the next best suitor. They seem a logical choice since they already have another first rounder to shell out money to. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheLongshot Posted April 5, 2010 Share Posted April 5, 2010 Russellmania09 Just spoke to a high level source...the McNabb trade does NOT 100 % rule out drafting a QB # 4 for #Redskins Russellmania09 The high level source said that if a QB like Sam Bradford were still to be at # 4..it would be a very tough decision #Redskins Tons of QBs, but no offensive line. Wonderful. Nice to see our organization has their priorities in the right place. :doh: Personally, I think there is very little chance that Bradford is there. Even if he is, such talk might be there to stimulate trade talks with other teams, basically threatening to pick him if someone doesn't make a deal for him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MGutta Posted April 5, 2010 Share Posted April 5, 2010 Let me play Socrates and follow up with another question to those that still take Bradford: Do you believe offensive line is not a need of the Washington Redskins? If we take Bradford, our remaining selections are 4th round, then 5th and finally 7th. We only have 4 picks for the entire draft, only one of which is in the top 100 (4th overall). You can show me that the Saints and Colts' lines were comprised of cast offs and late picks, but you have to realize, there was a lot of sifting out to do. Just because they had late round guys doesn't mean we can just sign an UDFA and automatically he's Jeff Saturday. We take Okung or, preferably, trade back. There's not much flexibility with that IMO. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mania Posted April 5, 2010 Share Posted April 5, 2010 Trading down would be my first choice, but youre scenario is a dream. First, even Al Davis wouldn't give a 2nd round pick for Campbell. Trade down and Trade both Andre Carter and Jason Campbell: First choice, trade down and pick up an OT in the first and OT/RB/LB in the second round and third round. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
XEL Posted April 5, 2010 Share Posted April 5, 2010 Eric Berry. McNabb solidified the QB position for another year or so. We get a BPA this year. Then next year we can still draft a QB and groom him up behind McNabb. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boss_Hogg Posted April 5, 2010 Share Posted April 5, 2010 Bradford and Okung will not be available with the 4th pick. Therefore I would trade down and acquire more picks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
J-bomb Posted April 5, 2010 Share Posted April 5, 2010 If Bradford and Clausen are there teams will come calling us now instead of trading ahead of us, are obvious need at QB is sured up so they won't think we will choose a QB @ 4. I can't wait to see who gets dealt next and for what, also watch for things to happen after this upcoming mini camp before the draft they are still evaluating players on our roster and other teams roster! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JetSkins Posted April 5, 2010 Share Posted April 5, 2010 trading down is difficult. not many teams want to climb up to pay a rookie $30 mil guaranteed. but in that scenario you can't argue with the team selecting bradford. when you get a chance to draft a franchise QB, you take it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
redskindan07 Posted April 5, 2010 Share Posted April 5, 2010 If Okung is gone before the 4th pick I will be worried. A trade back would be ideal if someone would help us out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Veretax Posted April 5, 2010 Share Posted April 5, 2010 I field trade calls from all comers, but if I don't like the offer I take him, and sign Flozelle adams and some scrubs to fill the OL for a year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Going Commando Posted April 5, 2010 Share Posted April 5, 2010 BPA or trade down and then go BPA. Drafting to fill seemingly glaring short term needs is why we have Carlos Rogers and not DeMarcus Ware, why we gave up an ass ton to select Rocky McIntosh, and why we ended up choosing LaRon Landry instead of Patrick Willis, Adrian Peterson, or Darrelle Revis after the Archuletta debacle. Resigning McNabb will give us years we couldn't get from a lameduck Campbell. We have time to rebuild this franchise the right way now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JetSkins Posted April 5, 2010 Share Posted April 5, 2010 Lions just traded for G Rob Sims Schefter says it most likely means they will go DT and not OL with #2 pick Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Commander Adama Posted April 5, 2010 Share Posted April 5, 2010 Take Bradford at 4 and groom him behind McNabb. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Da Truth Posted April 5, 2010 Share Posted April 5, 2010 Suh or McCoy If Landry is gone...then Eric Berry Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DWil Posted April 5, 2010 Share Posted April 5, 2010 If Bradford is available at #4 with Okung gone, you pull the trigger on Bradford....bottomline !!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.