Jump to content
Washington Football Team Logo
Extremeskins

Program alert: Houston texans vs titans on Sunday


gutlead74

Recommended Posts

I think a lot of the concepts will transfer.

I think you're absolutely correct. I wish I got NFLN here at college so I could take a peek.

Obviously we're going to see a better mix of Run/Pass as we aren't quite as one-dimensional as Houston. They have a real strength in the passing game and a real weakness on the ground. Unfortunately for us neither is quite the strength they have but our running game wasn't as bad either. Zorn at least succeeded in "keeping us medium" ;).

The game could be interesting to see how our personnel match matches up and how certain players may be used. Vinny Cerratto (I know :doh:) described Malcolm Kelly as an Andre Johnson type reciever. Obviously not the same talent but supposedly a similar style. If there is any merit to this claim we might be able to see what kind of routes we can expect him to be running.

I'm not sure if Slaton was injured at this point but it could also be interesting to see how he is used. I would think as a speed back if Alridge makes the team he might be used in a similar although more limited role.

Lastly I think we should get a big look at how Fred Davis/Chris Cooley are going to be implemented into our offense. Owen Daniels put up great numbers in only half a season so it looks like young Shanahan has the same TE friendly offense as his father.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think his offence will look a lot different. In Houston he had a huge target wide receiver to work with and here is biggest passing threat is a tight end. Hopefully his new offence will elevate Malcolm and Devin's games to new levels. I'm nothing but optimistic about Kyle.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think his offence will look a lot different. In Houston he had a huge target wide receiver to work with and here is biggest passing threat is a tight end. Hopefully his new offence will elevate Malcolm and Devin's games to new levels. I'm nothing but optimistic about Kyle.

Well like I said earlier Malcolm Kelly certainly isn't as good as Andre Johnson but his role although more limited, could be very similar. He also had a good TE in Owen Daniel in Houston who actually put up much better numbers than Cooley. Granted Cooley was called on to block frequently and we aren't as strong at the QB position but it does show potential for a strong emphasis on that position.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Of course its gonna look different in terms of the overall picture. We don't have an explosive WR like Andre Johnson, or a QB who put up the kind of numbers their QB did.

You have to look at the small things. OL play, blocking schemes. Route combinations the WRs run. Things like that.

Thanks gut, I'll be tuning in.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hey guys, just a heads up the texans vs titans is on NFL network Sunday at 5:30. Of course this is important to us seeing Kyle at work.

I watched some Texans game last year but i'll be paying much closer attention, in fact i might already have this game saved.

It a chance to take a look at what Kyle did offensively, especially in the passing game.

I think we could learn a lot from looking at and charting the following:

o formations: which ones and how often

o run/pass split specific to the formations

o types of runs specific to the formations

o 3-5-7 step drop, action and play-action passes how many times were each used

o how was the pass protection how often did Schuab get pressured or hit vs how often he had a clean pocket

o types of routes hitches, slants, posts etc...

o specific plays that stood out

o how open were the WR?

o how often were 2 TEs passing plays used

Thanks for the heads up

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Of course its gonna look different in terms of the overall picture. We don't have an explosive WR like Andre Johnson, or a QB who put up the kind of numbers their QB did.

You have to look at the small things. OL play, blocking schemes. Route combinations the WRs run. Things like that.

Thanks gut, I'll be tuning in.

Exactly. It's something that we can hope the Skins can aspire to be.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

or a QB who put up the kind of numbers their QB did.

I don't want to turn this into a love/hate JC thread, but can someone research how productive Matt Schaub was before he played under Shanahan? I don't remember him being a world beater before these last two years.

If that's true, and he put up numbers similar to or worse than JC, then I'm really optimistic. Scratch that, I'm optimistic anyway, just that this might make me even more.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quick takes from the Texans v Titans NFL replay:

o The Texans often use 'tight' formations with a Twin WR concept

e.g.- they often went singleback 3 WR 1 TE except the flanker WR was in tight to the TE and not side:

WR...............WR.......T-G-C-G-T-TE

......................................QB............WR

.......................................RB

They used a lot of double TEs formations and both TEs get targeted:

They often used this set:m_cfb0626ec16d4c5f867df2924dbd68eb.jpg it shares the same Twin WR concept above and adds a double TE stack at the U and Y

-They used this set^^ to attack the seam w/ their 2nd TE Dresden

They use some common formations that we used like this 2 TE set (except they actually passed form it and often to their TEs)

m_0b23f1d77e4e3f0ecc007cc18553318a.jpg

The share classics like: I-Form pro and they use a lot more Off-set Im_2f5b7d11ac21439aa3b6bfbdc5d80e38.jpg which i haven't seen use often

o Kyle didn't give up on the running game

o They use a lot of motion and it works to get receivers favorable often 1-on-1 match-ups

o I was amazed at how often they found away to get Andre Johnson matched up 1-on-1 and how often they got him and Jacoby Jones WIDE OPEN

o They are effective with the RB screen game

o They run a lot of 5 and 7 step drop passing

They ran I-Form tight where they motioned the Z receiver into the backfield

..............T--G--C-G-T-TE.....................WR

..............WR.....Q

.......................FB

.......................RB

They did a 7 step playaction pass where Schaub had all day to wait for a wide open Andre Johnson beautiful play

o The routes: they scored on a Post route which was practically absent from the Zorn offence in general anyone remember they last Post route we even threw?: http://www.nfl.com/videos/nfl-game-highlights/09000d5d80d543de/Santana-Moss-Highlight-WK-15-vs-Bengals-2008,

they also attacked with the Seam route with the TEs

and the got Andre Johnson matched up 1-on-1 and threw slants

They ran a fan favorite TE screen from a 5 receivers no back set very similiar to this one against the Cards from shotgun @1:21 http://www.nfl.com/videos/nfl-game-highlights/09000d5d80b02019/NFL-GameDay-Cardinals-vs-Redskins-highlights

They ran playaction to the TE on the goalline

Other notes:

o Early on the Texans called a draw on 3rd and 18 they didn't get it

-funny thing is the Titans also called a draw on 3rd and 18 and scored a TD

i thought it was a good reminder that fans always overeact i can just see the posts when Kyles calls a run on 3rd and long, lol

Andre Johnson has great focus and body control he was running a drag route and the ball was thrown about 2 yard behind him he had the presence of mind to reach back and tip the ball to himself and made a great catch

The main thing i took from this game is that Kyle is gonna make good use of this formation with 2 WR/2 TE personnel and with 3 WR 1 TE personnel

m_cfb0626ec16d4c5f867df2924dbd68eb.jpg

Anyone watch the game?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Greenie, that was a great breakdown, thanks for the work and the pictures to explain. It'll sure be crazy to see a real NFL offense installed on this team. Definately didn't have it under Zorn and as much as I love Coach Gibbs, his offense was dated and I never really felt as though it was innovative at any point, even with Al's 700+ page playbook.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

o They use a lot of motion and it works to get receivers favorable often 1-on-1 match-ups

Both Shanahans tend to rely heavily on pre-snap motion and aren't terribly concerned with having somewhat unorthodox personnel groupings for certain formations (WRs in the backfield, backs split out wide, etc.). I haven't watched much of the Texans but it's definitely a big part of how Mike Shanahan was able to get a bead on opposing defenses and exploit their weaknesses later in the game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

...can someone research how productive Matt Schaub was before he played under Shanahan? I don't remember him being a world beater before these last two years.

He's not a world beater per se, but it was obvious back when Schaub played at UVA that he had a lot of promise. Coming in in place of Vick while Vick was still with the Falcon's, he showed that ability. The reason Houston went out and stole him from Atlanta in the first place.

Oh and I've seen probably 12 Texans games or so over the past 2 years since Schaub has been there, and this is the reason I was clamoring for Kyle Shanahan back when daddy was an option for coming here as HC months ago. Thankfully, I got my wish.

BTW, nobody really even knew about Owen Daniels before the last couple years, and if he hadn't gotten hurt would have put up top numbers by a tight end this year...good news for Cooley and Davis.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

BTW, nobody really even knew about Owen Daniels before the last couple years, and if he hadn't gotten hurt would have put up top numbers by a tight end this year...good news for Cooley and Davis.

yah and all the two TE sets will shut these fools up that want to trade Cooley

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Both Shanahans tend to rely heavily on pre-snap motion and aren't terribly concerned with having somewhat unorthodox personnel groupings for certain formations (WRs in the backfield, backs split out wide, etc.). I haven't watched much of the Texans but it's definitely a big part of how Mike Shanahan was able to get a bead on opposing defenses and exploit their weaknesses later in the game.

I thought people would be excited to talk about which if any of the Texans concepts would translate to our Redskins team.

I think a lot of Kyle's concepts will translate.

I think Mike/Kyle's ability to diagnose and attack defenses and dictate coverage will result in our primary receivers being open more consistently which will result in simpler reads for our QB.

The question is personnel and i think we have similiar talent at the skill positions.

Matt Schaub at this point is a superior QB to anyone we have now and will have next year. But, with the guidance from Mike S/Kyle/LeFleuer i think our QB is going to get top level coaching and a chance to have success.

I think the our TEs as a unit are as good if not better.

The Texans receiving corp is clearly better then ours mainly because of the singular talent of Andre Johnson.

But, i think Moss and Thomas speed could give a similar vertical component and run after the catch ability and Kelly's similar size and hands. So the combination of our 3 top receivers could fit different elements of their passing game that Johnson provided. In one respect our receiving corps could be better then their because while we don't have 1 receiver as good as AJ each of our top 3 has at least 1 similiar trait.

The running back comparison is difficult because they had a down year with Slaton's sophmore slump but we have a proven back in Portis whose dedication and health are a hige question mark.

I hope that we don't forget about our other backs and as a unit i think we have the better backfield.

The major area of difference other then QB was OL.

They run a lot of 5 and 7 step drop passes, with play-action and bootlegs mixed in.

And quite frankly at this point we don't have an OL that can play anywhere near their level.

So the question becomes how much can we upgrade our OL and how much can coaching and continuity improve our OL?

And how much can they tweak their scheme to match the ability or lack thereof of our OL and still have a productive offense?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...