hogluv4life Posted February 17, 2010 Share Posted February 17, 2010 Al Davis, please pick up the white courtesy phone.Al Davis, to the white courtesy phone please. LMFAO!!! ur a sick funny man! Shouldn't we up the tender then? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hieverybody Posted February 17, 2010 Share Posted February 17, 2010 Dont jump the gun. Buldger didnt clean out his locker, the staff did. And everyone elses as well. That ship has not sailed......yet. Where did you hear that? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jumbo Posted February 17, 2010 Share Posted February 17, 2010 Also FYI to the OP: the mods won't take kindly to your thread title being a "mystery" one, in that you force the readers to open the thread to see what it's about. Just tryna keep you out of trouble! No one is forced to read a thread. Actually, terps is right (though MAAT's not going to be penalized) and terps is doing what we have always asked members to do for helping self-police this forum. This is also mentioned on our rules page. You, however, still seem to be suffering from a case of pissy-itis and a related condition of message board oppositional disorder :pfft: when it comes to this board's operation. And, your post here could be considered spam (which we're really discouraging): #3. Spam is strictly prohibited. Examples: Very short posts that do not add value to the topic Your post offers nothing that isn't beyond obvious and didn't need to be said, had absolutely no useful point to the topic or even anything else, and was apparently made only in service of your issues. I advise you to get with the program. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Morneblade Posted February 17, 2010 Share Posted February 17, 2010 Where did you hear that? Here http://twitter.com/Adam_Schefter/status/9195162153 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brandon Lloyd Christmas Posted February 17, 2010 Share Posted February 17, 2010 Al Davis, please pick up the white courtesy phone.Al Davis, to the white courtesy phone please. imagine that, signing a kicker to a 4 mil a year deal and then trading a 1st rounder for campbell. al davis would be my new hero lol. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MAATopDogg Posted February 17, 2010 Author Share Posted February 17, 2010 Totally agree. It's like putting your used car up for sale. You want $2000 out of it so you advertise it at $2,500 and see if you get any bites. I hope it's true, I just can't see MS wasting the time to integrate Jason into his offense for one year. The amount of time to integrate him and help him unlearn bad habits would be more costly than starting with a clean slate.With the amount of talent we have between just MS and BA I don't think our o-line will be in as much trouble in 2010 as most think. It may take some serious wheeling and dealing but I think between FA and the Draft BA can make certain a new QB can start without getting destroyed. Maybe I'm just optimistic. I agree why waste the time if you know he'll only be here one year. I think our line will be built through FA and it would be a total waste to use our 4th on a OT. I could see if there were a prospect in this draft like a Tony Boselli. We can get a OL with our second and later picks. We'll probably get a 2nd for Jason then draft a QB with our first, a OL withour 1st 2nd rounder, and a RB with a 2nd 2nd rounder. I expect us to get most of our Oline in FA though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Morneblade Posted February 17, 2010 Share Posted February 17, 2010 I agree why waste the time if you know he'll only be here one year. I think our line will be built through FA and it would be a total waste to use our 4th on a OT. I could see if there were a prospect in this draft like a Tony Boselli. We can get a OL with our second and later picks. We'll probably get a 2nd for Jason then draft a QB with our first, a OL withour 1st 2nd rounder, and a RB with a 2nd 2nd rounder. I expect us to get most of our Oline in FA though. We better hope not. Apparently you havent looked at the FA market. It can be discribed in 2 words Old Thin We really might be better off trading out of the #4 and getting 2 starting O-Linemen out of it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
THE HAMMER'IN HOG Posted February 17, 2010 Share Posted February 17, 2010 Dont jump the gun. Buldger didnt clean out his locker, the staff did. And everyone elses as well. That ship has not sailed......yet. I was kind of hoping they do make a move for a QB regardless of who, that should free us up to take Bradford, I think it comes down to how much do they like Suy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
redskinsrmylyfe Posted February 17, 2010 Share Posted February 17, 2010 Campbell is worth a 2nd or a 3rd + a late round pick.Vick maybe is the bigger name but JC is the better QB in my opion.so I would'nt be shocked if some team has contacted about JC. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MAATopDogg Posted February 17, 2010 Author Share Posted February 17, 2010 We better hope not. Apparently you havent looked at the FA market. It can be discribed in 2 wordsOld Thin We really might be better off trading out of the #4 and getting 2 starting O-Linemen out of it. We can get OL in the later rounds and there are some Unrestricted FA linemen that fit our scheme on the Texans, Broncos, Niners, Saints. Look at the Colts, not one 1st rounder on there OL and I believe some of them weren't even drafted. One OL in the 1st round is not going to solve our OL problems. Plus some of the FA OL won't require any big dollars. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skinsfan190 Posted February 17, 2010 Share Posted February 17, 2010 It would be nice if we could get a 2nd from Buffalo or Rams. They need a QB bad. Then we can take Clausen and maybe 2 OL at the top of the 2nd round. That senario would be amazing Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
redskinsrmylyfe Posted February 17, 2010 Share Posted February 17, 2010 We can get OL in the later rounds and there are some Unrestricted FA linemen that fit our scheme on the Texans, Broncos, Niners, Saints. Look at the Colts, not one 1st rounder on there OL and I believe some of them weren't even drafted. One OL in the 1st round is not going to solve our OL problems. yeah I think they will adress OL by FA and the draft in the latter rounds cause the type of lineman shanny likes are not the big monsters most teams perfer.He likes small,smart,and fast lineman. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
redskinsrmylyfe Posted February 17, 2010 Share Posted February 17, 2010 It would be nice if we could get a 2nd from Buffalo or Rams. They need a QB bad. Then we can take Clausen and maybe 2 OL at the top of the 2nd round. That senario would be amazing we could maybe get whittner and a 3rd or 4th from bufflo 4 JC Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Morneblade Posted February 17, 2010 Share Posted February 17, 2010 We can get OL in the later rounds and there are some Unrestricted FA linemen that fit our scheme on the Texans, Broncos, Niners, Saints. Look at the Colts, not one 1st rounder on there OL and I believe some of them weren't even drafted. One OL in the 1st round is not going to solve our OL problems. And that approach has worked so well for us thus far.....:doh: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
icbmayday Posted February 17, 2010 Share Posted February 17, 2010 I hope he shows how good he can be and we lock him up to a long deal....We all know he will be here this season Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skinsfan190 Posted February 17, 2010 Share Posted February 17, 2010 we could maybe get whittner and a 3rd or 4th from bufflo 4 JC Thats not a bad deal, but we already have Landry and he is a Whitner type. Landry is actually better in coverage. Just need to stop mental mistakes. With that said. I would take it. We need alot of draft picks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
redskinsrmylyfe Posted February 17, 2010 Share Posted February 17, 2010 And that approach has worked so well for us thus far.....:doh: No its because we spent to little draft picks period on OL.That does'nt mean u have to spend your top pick on a lineman but we do need to pick up atleast 3 starters and a couple of back ups through FA and the draft. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GIBBS LIVES Posted February 17, 2010 Share Posted February 17, 2010 No one is interested in offering us anything real for Campbell. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brandon Lloyd Christmas Posted February 17, 2010 Share Posted February 17, 2010 We better hope not. Apparently you havent looked at the FA market. It can be discribed in 2 wordsOld Thin We really might be better off trading out of the #4 and getting 2 starting O-Linemen out of it. but hes right. even if you like jason you cant possibly think hes a legitimate future QB for this organization, so why would shanahan tread water with him for one year? why waste all that time pouring your playbook and things into a guy if hes only a one year stop gap? unless you can say with a straight face that jason is worth keeping around for 5 more years....... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CRobi21 Posted February 17, 2010 Share Posted February 17, 2010 No one is interested in offering us anything real for Campbell. Thank you for the statement every GM for EVERY team in the league. It's much appreciated. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hieverybody Posted February 17, 2010 Share Posted February 17, 2010 Herehttp://twitter.com/Adam_Schefter/status/9195162153 Thanks. Hard to see how the broadcaster could say this "I was told Bulger cleaned his because he doesn’t expect to be back." Time to get new sources. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hieverybody Posted February 17, 2010 Share Posted February 17, 2010 but hes right. even if you like jason you cant possibly think hes a legitimate future QB for this organization, so why would shanahan tread water with him for one year? why waste all that time pouring your playbook and things into a guy if hes only a one year stop gap?unless you can say with a straight face that jason is worth keeping around for 5 more years....... There are a lot of people willing to say that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brandon Lloyd Christmas Posted February 17, 2010 Share Posted February 17, 2010 There are a lot of people willing to say that. thats disturbing on so many levels its hard to even comprehend. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Morneblade Posted February 17, 2010 Share Posted February 17, 2010 No its because we spent to little draft picks period on OL.That does'nt mean u have to spend your top pick on a lineman but we do need to pick up atleast 3 starters and a couple of back ups through FA and the draft. Yes, and the best way to do that is to trade down and get 3 day one picks and possibly another mid round pick. but hes right. even if you like jason you cant possibly think hes a legitimate future QB for this organization, so why would shanahan tread water with him for one year? why waste all that time pouring your playbook and things into a guy if hes only a one year stop gap?unless you can say with a straight face that jason is worth keeping around for 5 more years....... I have no idea what our current FO is going to do. As to why he might keep a guy that was a average qb behind a line that ranked 27th or worse in just about every possible catagory (run and pass) maybe he thinks the qb isnt the problem with the offense. But since you're so well informed and know Mike so well (you ARE on a first name basis, right), I'm sure you know exactly what he will do. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brandon Lloyd Christmas Posted February 17, 2010 Share Posted February 17, 2010 I have no idea what our current FO is going to do. As to why he might keep a guy that was a average qb behind a line that ranked 27th or worse in just about every possible catagory (run and pass) maybe he thinks the qb isnt the problem with the offense. But since you're so well informed and know Mike so well (you ARE on a first name basis, right), I'm sure you know exactly what he will do. well be a gambling man. do you think mike shanahan is going to hitch his wagon as redskins head coach to the jason campbell train? if i was a betting man, id bet all my money on no. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.