FanboyOf91 Posted August 31, 2009 Share Posted August 31, 2009 Albert Haynesworth can realistically come here and get 0 quarterback sacks and still be successful. If he allows our linebackers to make plays in the backfield, whether it be in the way of tackles for loss, balls batted down or quarterback sacks and pressures on blitzes, then he did his job. Would it be nice to see him get some sack numbers himself? Sure, but that's bonus. His main job is to close gaps against run and open up blitzing lanes when a blitz is called. If no blitz is called, and we're looking to pressure with four men, then it's his job to make a play. Good stuff. :applause: Sadly, I expect a "Haynesworth has 0 sacks = bum" thread sometime this year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MassSkinsFan Posted August 31, 2009 Share Posted August 31, 2009 Thanks KDawg. This was a good D-Line 101 write-up. I look forward to your more advanced D-Line chalk talk! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jflow78 Posted August 31, 2009 Share Posted August 31, 2009 This is a great thread. I appreciate the shared football knowledge on this forum (when it is actually shared). I only played in the passing game (WR, CB, FS), so my knowledge of the DL/LB/OL/RB is pretty limited. Thanks for the info. It reminds me of the West Coast Offense thread someone posted last year, breaking down a lot of the details of how the offensive system works. I didn't see too much pressure on Tom Brady, but after Moss' second TD, it did seem like our adjustments were perfect for stopping their passing game. Plus, people were worried about Orakpo playing the run and he made a picture perfect LB/DE play on the right side of the field (from the def perspective) on one of the Pats outside the tackle run plays. I was cheering for that play alone, and the one where Haynesworth pretty much did a belly flop on Brady, oh and Smoots diving defense on a pass. I think our DL got some good pressure after the adjustments. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
authentic Posted August 31, 2009 Share Posted August 31, 2009 KDawg, its funny how alot of what you've outlined is what i've already known of, but not from a technical sense. Basically, it came from just a basic knowledge and observing the game for so many years. The way you break it down makes it really clear and understandable. Good job my man! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MattFancy Posted August 31, 2009 Share Posted August 31, 2009 Great thread KDawg! Can't wait to read more like this. Keep up the good work! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ThePreciating Posted August 31, 2009 Share Posted August 31, 2009 Absolutely awesome post. I'm excited to see if Haynesworth/Griffin is a better combo than the Williams wall. I think the potential is definitely there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
21forlyfe Posted August 31, 2009 Share Posted August 31, 2009 What we saw against the Gaytriots is our Dline....Much Improved,but no where near being dominate yet.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xero21 Posted August 31, 2009 Share Posted August 31, 2009 What we saw against the Gaytriots is our Dline....Much Improved,but no where near being dominate yet.. Did you even read the first post? And to KDawg: I love these threads. How long have you been coaching? Thanks for actually taking the time to learn us a thing or two about real football. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
21forlyfe Posted August 31, 2009 Share Posted August 31, 2009 Did you even read the first post?And to KDawg: I love these threads. How long have you been coaching? Thanks for actually taking the time to learn us a thing or two about real football. so what are you saying we are dominate?:doh: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xero21 Posted August 31, 2009 Share Posted August 31, 2009 so what are you saying we are dominate?:doh: No I'm saying no one mentioned the Patriots game. If you didn't read the first post I think you should cause it's a nice read. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PCS Posted August 31, 2009 Share Posted August 31, 2009 21forlyfe isn't posting in this thread anymore because apparently he just doesn't get it. Now. Back to chalk talk. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HailToTheRedskins14 Posted August 31, 2009 Share Posted August 31, 2009 I know it is only gonna look like I'm throwing this one out there with no source...and I kinda am, but I have read interviews with a couple different NFL coaches that have quoted them saying the sack stat is one of the most overrated stats in the league. It kinda is funny how some people hold it in such high regard, because clearly it isn't the most important thing for a D linemen. People will actually make the Hall based on their sack total. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skinsfan4life83 Posted August 31, 2009 Share Posted August 31, 2009 As basically a rookie to these forums i love reading informative posts such as these. Great post K-Dawg, I have learned much today Thank you:D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KDawg Posted August 31, 2009 Author Share Posted August 31, 2009 Thanks KDawg. This was a good D-Line 101 write-up. I look forward to your more advanced D-Line chalk talk! No problem Thanks for the info. It reminds me of the West Coast Offense thread someone posted last year, breaking down a lot of the details of how the offensive system works. Check the link Mark The Homer posted, I posted a series of WCO threads last year. I believe Oldskool posted a WCO thread as well. KDawg, its funny how alot of what you've outlined is what i've already known of, but not from a technical sense. Basically, it came from just a basic knowledge and observing the game for so many years. The way you break it down makes it really clear and understandable. Good job my man! I didn't even get all that technical, but thank you for the props man! Great thread KDawg! Can't wait to read more like this. Keep up the good work! Thank you, sir Absolutely awesome post. I'm excited to see if Haynesworth/Griffin is a better combo than the Williams wall. I think the potential is definitely there. Not sure if they'll be better, but I'm sure they're going to be able to get the job done. Thanks for the kudos And to KDawg: I love these threads. How long have you been coaching? Thanks for actually taking the time to learn us a thing or two about real football. Fifth year coaching. You're welcome. Thanks for reading! I know it is only gonna look like I'm throwing this one out there with no source...and I kinda am, but I have read interviews with a couple different NFL coaches that have quoted them saying the sack stat is one of the most overrated stats in the league.It kinda is funny how some people hold it in such high regard, because clearly it isn't the most important thing for a D linemen. People will actually make the Hall based on their sack total. Nope, you're absolutely correct. That said, guys like Bruce Smith and Reggie White got the job done both with sacks and in their support roles. Definitely true hall of famers Thanks for reading. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KDawg Posted August 31, 2009 Author Share Posted August 31, 2009 As basically a rookie to these forums i love reading informative posts such as these. Great post K-Dawg, I have learned much today Thank you:D You're welcome Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gatorskin77 Posted August 31, 2009 Share Posted August 31, 2009 Awesome thread K Dog thanks can't wait to read more of your posts now, What level are you coaching Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KDawg Posted August 31, 2009 Author Share Posted August 31, 2009 I'm the 7th/8th grade head coach and the varsity defensive line coach and assistant offensive line coach. I pull double duty. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IHOPSkins Posted August 31, 2009 Share Posted August 31, 2009 .....Many here have the perception that defensive line play is purely all about quarterback pressure, tackling the running back and sacking the quarterback. It's not, far from it.......STANCE/STARTS/STAY LOW Besides a good stance, two of the most important things for a defensive lineman to do are to get off the ball quickly (the instant the ball is snapped, the DL should be moving towards the LOS) and staying low. If a defensive lineman stands straight up, they are sure to be driven backward. It's all about leverage, and the lower you are, the better off you are....... I am not disagreeing with your post (and I really appreciate them!)There are transitional duties during a rush like Containment and Pass Blocking that require a more upright position pass blocking? d-line doesn't pass block. and containment doesn't require a more upright position.i think maybe you're saying pass rush, so just let me clarify....a d-lineman doesn't stay hunched over. what k-dawg is saying, accurately, is that a d-lineman has to fire out and stay low thru any contact. sure, if a de is pursuing a qb after getting past a block, he will be more upright. My point was when a DL rush is not successful in putting pressure on the QB they can transition to a) containing a delayed run/short pass block a pass or make it harder for QB to pass Staying low would not be beneficial at this stage of the play But I should have used the term "blocking a pass" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KDawg Posted August 31, 2009 Author Share Posted August 31, 2009 My point was when a DL rush is not successful in putting pressure on the QB they can transition to a) containing a delayed run/short pass block a pass or make it harder for QB to pass Staying low would not be beneficial at this stage of the play But I should have used the term "blocking a pass" You're still missing the point. You need to remain low through contact. Once contact is made and you've shed the blocker, or were unable to beat the blocker, then you need to make a read. If you read pass your way, hands need to go up and your pad level needs to rise. Containing a delayed run (are you referring to a draw?) you would be able to do from a low position. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IHOPSkins Posted August 31, 2009 Share Posted August 31, 2009 You're still missing the point. You need to remain low through contact. Once contact is made and you've shed the blocker, or were unable to beat the blocker, then you need to make a read. If you read pass your way, hands need to go up and your pad level needs to rise. Containing a delayed run (are you referring to a draw?) you would be able to do from a low position. Make a read = TransitionWe agree for the most part Delayed run could also be a QB with no open receivers and Situational awareness is enhanced with distance and height from your oppositional lineman Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KDawg Posted September 1, 2009 Author Share Posted September 1, 2009 We agree for the most part I'm not sure what you're arguing then, to be honest, as this is what both Maj and I have said in this thread Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
darrelgreenie Posted September 1, 2009 Share Posted September 1, 2009 another thing that is often discussed that not everyone knows is defensive-line techniques. kind of misleading, as it refers to WHERE the d-lineman lines up pre-snap, Different programs have different ways of numbering techniques. Major's is one that I have seen. Another good thread, K-dawg, but man its a complicated topic to sum up in a small space. I thought people might get a better idea of how the assignments and gaps work if they see how Blache uses our D-line. Correct me if i'm wrong on a typical 1st down our DL assignements are as such: Carter-5 tech=C Haynesworth-1/1.5=A gap Griffin-3=B gap Daniels-5=C plays more like a tackle then an end Haynesworth commands the double Griffin quick penetrates Carter rushes tries to beat his man around the corner but not too wide Daniels controlled rush/more like a DT then an end A few plays on the clip below gives a good look at the DL: http://www.sendspace.com/file/frz1q4 Size: 6MB Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mark The Homer Posted September 1, 2009 Share Posted September 1, 2009 That link shows the Redskins offense... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DirtyGunz8 Posted September 1, 2009 Share Posted September 1, 2009 Good read KDawg and we all know Haynesworth seals gaps like a gasket when he's not rushing the passer. He gets such a big push up the middle. Big things on the way. HTTR Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skins island connection Posted September 1, 2009 Share Posted September 1, 2009 Good stuff KDawg! Maybe you can answer this for me; I've noticed on some 3rd downs, our D looks to be in full blitz, but the CB's are playing 8 yds off the receivers. I know i'm not crazy, but i've seen them before, when it was a full press blitz, with CB's dead frontof the receivers, chucking them at the snap, disrupting the timing. Why do they not do this anymore? it seemed to be pretty successful before... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.