Arsenic Posted August 20, 2009 Share Posted August 20, 2009 This guy could be a good example of why not to draft by position.. edit and, somewhat, off topic: I reallllly dont want to watch another QB get trained.. Although I will if I must Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SirClintonPortis Posted August 20, 2009 Share Posted August 20, 2009 This guy was Mr. Manboobs, right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theboomking Posted August 20, 2009 Share Posted August 20, 2009 Next year looks like a great OT year, and unlike this year should have depth/value into the second round and later. Even if we could trade for him, which we couldn't, we wouldn't. Next year's 1st is either going for at OT, Philip Rivers, but hopefully not a 1st rd QB. The last thing we need is to start over AGAIN with the elite defensive talent we have Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DiscoBob Posted August 21, 2009 Author Share Posted August 21, 2009 This guy was Mr. Manboobs, right? Yup, they were GGG cups Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mi6 Posted August 21, 2009 Share Posted August 21, 2009 Let's keep our eye on the waiver wire. Dane Radolph, a Univ. of Maryland product is getting rave reviews. He is a RT, and if he gets cut, we should look into bringing him in. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoulRebel Posted August 21, 2009 Share Posted August 21, 2009 No! Keynsian economics does not work in the NFL. You cannot just throw money at a problem. WE, of all teams, know that. hahaha! yet another reason keynesian economics needs to be dismissed as the foolishness that it is. and nothing higher than a 3rd rounder for smith if any deal ever takes place. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Streater101 Posted August 21, 2009 Share Posted August 21, 2009 He's a left tackle He wouldn't play LT here in DC, we have that Chris Samuels guy over there. Also ladies and gentleman, there is no trigger to pull. The Bungles can't trade a player that is not even signed. I personally never heard of such a precedent in the history of rookie holdouts, and there have been quite a few. and to think, I was hoping there was a chance he'd drop to 13, :doh: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gary Clark Fan Posted August 21, 2009 Share Posted August 21, 2009 after seeing andre on HK i definetly would not want to trade for him....dude doesnt even look like a football player, heck he looks more like the pledge in Old School. Fat and out of shape; he ain't protecting Jason this year. Pass. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BigMike21 Posted August 21, 2009 Share Posted August 21, 2009 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BigMike21 Posted August 21, 2009 Share Posted August 21, 2009 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nonniey Posted August 21, 2009 Share Posted August 21, 2009 I'd jump at that trade if I was the Skins GM (or Owner as is actually the case). That said I believe that there is a deadline for trading drafted players which should be coming up soon. After the season the Bengals could then trade the rights up until the time of the draft (In which case I might still offer the #1 pending our draft position and a physical of Smith). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
redskins55 Posted August 21, 2009 Share Posted August 21, 2009 :no: Would rather go after a veteran Runyan or Levi Jones Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CommDownMan Posted August 21, 2009 Share Posted August 21, 2009 Correct, here is the relevant infoSection 4. Signing of Drafted Rookies: (a) A drafted player may accept the Required Tender at any time up to and including the Tuesday following the tenth week of the regular season immediately following the Draft, at 4:00 p.m. New York time . . . ( If a Drafted Rookie has not signed a Player Contract during the period from the date of such Draft to the thirtieth day prior to the first Sunday of the regular season: (i) the Club that drafted the player may not thereafter trade to another Club either its exclusive negotiating rights to such player or any Player Contract that it signs with such player for the player’s initial League Year; and (ii) the Club that drafted the player is the only Club with which the player may sign a Player Contract until the day of the Draft in the subsequent League Year, at which time such player is eligible to be drafted in the subsequent League Year’s Draft by any Club except the Club that drafted him in the initial Draft. (After the Tuesday following the tenth week of the regular season, the player and the Club may only sign a Player Contract for future League Year(s)). Not that it will happen (really they couldn't). If he isn't signed by start of free agency would he become a free agent? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DiscoBob Posted August 21, 2009 Author Share Posted August 21, 2009 nsfw!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cphil006 Posted August 21, 2009 Share Posted August 21, 2009 Can we trade for Jansen :doh: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
txkid Posted August 22, 2009 Share Posted August 22, 2009 The Skins should keep open the possibility of trades for the remaining holdouts. Rookies Smith and Crabtree as well as Texans vet Robinson. Of course to obtain talent the Skins will have to trade some talent. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
brianm23 Posted September 1, 2009 Share Posted September 1, 2009 http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=4438326 Not such a good idea after all eh? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ALLWORLD Posted September 1, 2009 Share Posted September 1, 2009 Not such a good idea after all eh? This thread is the 1st thing that came to mind when I heard he got injured... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peeping Wizard Posted September 1, 2009 Share Posted September 1, 2009 One of these threads seems to pop up every offseason. This is the ultimate pie in the sky discussion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Horton_Predator48 Posted September 2, 2009 Share Posted September 2, 2009 I'm soooooooooo glad "we" didn't pick Smith. Orakpo is the man. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bishtw Posted September 2, 2009 Share Posted September 2, 2009 I'm soooooooooo glad "we" didn't pick Smith. Orakpo is the man. +1 whew Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jaydogg3eb Posted September 2, 2009 Share Posted September 2, 2009 ....dude doesnt even look like a football player, heck he looks more like the pledge in Old School. Fat and out of shape QUINCY!!! Hahahaha Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Veretax Posted September 2, 2009 Share Posted September 2, 2009 Bengals already signed Smith, and he has a broken foot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
#1njskinsfan Posted September 2, 2009 Share Posted September 2, 2009 the major problem would be a cap hit for cincy... plus, fat guys with bad feet = short time in nfl Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Slacky McSlackAss Posted September 2, 2009 Share Posted September 2, 2009 Him and Mike Williams can have a hot dog eating contest. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.