addicted Posted April 1, 2009 Share Posted April 1, 2009 Honestly I have no idea how the Redskins would even be players in this deal.The Bears, Vikings, and Jets should be the only teams in these talks. For the Jets this would be the 2nd coming of Joe Namath and give the Jets an opportunity to build a team around a QB instead of around a coaching philosophy. For the Bears, here is a team that always thinks defense first but has never had a QB. They could give up a first AND a 2nd and still come out ahead. Last season the Vikings would have gone to the Superbowl is only they had a pro bowl QB. Here is one being dangled in front of them and they aren't really interested? Superbowl recipe: Vikings trade for Cutler and sign Tory Holt. Hurts their future but they become Big Time Superbowl contenders. However, they are a mixed up franchise, and it will never happen. Because the Broncos are going to need a QB to replace Cutler. If all it takes is a first and second to get it done we can do that too (see my previous post) and give them a young QB with similar numbers minus the ones that actually make you elite in this league. Who are the Jets going to offer them QB wise and where are the JETS picking this year? No one. What about the Bears or Vikings? Look I see Jason Campbell as middle of road QB wise ranked somewhere between 14 and 18 in the league but I see Travarious Jackson, Rex Grossman, and Sage Rosenfells much lower then that. Jason Campbell is better then those guys. The reason we are in these discussions is we offer them a QB that's better then what any of the other teams have PLUS two solid draft picks which is likely going to seal the deal, one this year for cap reasons, one next year for market value. The only ammunition these three teams you mention have against us is higher draft picks or other players but like the Patriots know too well, the higher the draft pick and round selection the more you have to pay these totally unknown guys. The reason the Pats gave up Cassel for a second is the money they have to pay the player for a higher pick. If Chicago wanted to offer then Grossman and two number ones for Cutler Denver has a problem, those two number one picks might be nice to have but you have to take a player and add his huge salary that you don't know is any good. Of course any team could offer another player who plays at a different position but then what is Denver going to do at QB? Since we have the best QB availible out of the teams interested in Cutler of course we are in this discussion and with the draft right around the corner we are in a better draft position then all of these teams you mentioned. Denver does pick before us so they could have picks 12 and 13, our second rounder next year, and Jason Campbell to tutor the rookie they take with our number one pick. Great trade for both clubs Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
benskins26 Posted April 1, 2009 Share Posted April 1, 2009 Bob Glauber just said on First Take that we are one of the 4 favorites. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SkinzFan007 Posted April 1, 2009 Share Posted April 1, 2009 http://www.denverexaminer.problitz.com/sports/broncos/20090401-Cutler-Trade.html Cutler to San Fran? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rocky52Mc Posted April 1, 2009 Share Posted April 1, 2009 From a Denver Post article?It would be funny, but a little unprofessional. I don't see them joking on this. Well..that kind of makes it more believable to be an April fools joke... It's from the hometown newspaper, and the Redskins are the perfect team to target. I disagree though, I think Campbell will come out the true professional here just like he always has been and rally this team into truly seeing him as the QB for this franchise for years to come. What's done is done. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Veretax Posted April 1, 2009 Share Posted April 1, 2009 I hear what your saying. But there are only, maybe, 5 better QB's in the league then Cutler. Just 5!!If you have the chance, you have to secure the franchise QB. You just do. With the season being uncapped after this year, Salary won't be an issue and then stupid Vinny will be forced to draft lineman to protect Cutler. He'll have no choice but to address the lines after the fact. I think this is close to the truth, with Favre now retired my top 5 would likely be: Peyton Manning Tom Brady Drew Breez Phillip Rivers Toss up between Aaron Rodgers/Eli Manning If McDaniels wants Brennan shouldnt that tell the FO here something. If we get Cutler, I don't see a reason to keep Brennan, if Denver wants him and we get Cutler, trade JC to detroit for a 2nd or 3rd Round pick. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
apickmans Posted April 1, 2009 Share Posted April 1, 2009 whens the next red zone show with Vinny? Hopefully someone will ask him about the rumors that keep swirling around having to do with us pursuing Cutler. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lavarleap56 Posted April 1, 2009 Share Posted April 1, 2009 id rather have a coach that has a few championships under his belt than one who thinks his nfc championship ring is a accomplishment. just my 2 cents though Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MattFancy Posted April 1, 2009 Share Posted April 1, 2009 id rather have a coach that has a few championships under his belt than one who thinks his nfc championship ring is a accomplishment. just my 2 cents though shanahan over fassel? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ibrahim Posted April 1, 2009 Share Posted April 1, 2009 I think this is close to the truth, with Favre now retired my top 5 would likely be:Peyton Manning Tom Brady Drew Breez Phillip Rivers Toss up between Aaron Rodgers/Eli Manning If we get Cutler, I don't see a reason to keep Brennan, if Denver wants him and we get Cutler, trade JC to detroit for a 2nd or 3rd Round pick. Aaron Rodgers over Cutler? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
That Redskins Fan Posted April 1, 2009 Share Posted April 1, 2009 http://www.denverexaminer.problitz.com/sports/broncos/20090401-Cutler-Trade.htmlapril fools Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Conn Posted April 1, 2009 Share Posted April 1, 2009 DAMN san fran is agresive as hell with that deal That is an April Fool's joke, read the "around the NFL" part right after it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cmman848 Posted April 1, 2009 Share Posted April 1, 2009 Firing Zorn for Shanahan would be the worst move this team could possibly make end of story. I dont know if the WORST move but i def. agree that it would be a mistake. We need to give zorn this year and unless he is an abismal 5-11 or 6-10 a 3rd year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cphil006 Posted April 1, 2009 Share Posted April 1, 2009 PFT is a year-round April Fool's Joke Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rd421 Posted April 1, 2009 Share Posted April 1, 2009 PFT is a year-round April Fool's Joke + infinity....they are not the most credible source around.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Veretax Posted April 1, 2009 Share Posted April 1, 2009 Aaron Rodgers over Cutler? Aaron Rodgers showed a lot more potential and crispness last year than Cutler has shown, but admittedly, He Eli and Cutler are VERY VERY close together in my mind, It wouldn't take much for cutler to be #4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mister Happy Posted April 2, 2009 Share Posted April 2, 2009 Which is why PFT included a link to the Denver Post in their article....Or, in other words: Click one of the leading candidates to land Cutler Have you ever played telephone? Why link to a site that links to an article, when you can link directly to the article? Nobody wants PFT's sloppy seconds. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.