21Knock_U_Out Posted February 2, 2009 Share Posted February 2, 2009 that last play was an incomplete pass... i cant believe they didnt even review it. the league loves the steelers. the refs were definitely for the steelers. the cards would have had a 1st down at the 21. i think i like my chances with fitz. I was thinking the same thing. You would think they would have at least pretended to review it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
D'KanSkinFan Posted February 2, 2009 Share Posted February 2, 2009 lions and tigers and bears....oh my Friends skinned em' has not made any friends yet And~ "wicked witch" you won't have any Don't dis' Kansas~ got my drift~:mad: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fasttimes Posted February 2, 2009 Share Posted February 2, 2009 that last play was an incomplete pass... i cant believe they didnt even review it. the league loves the steelers. the refs were definitely for the steelers. the cards would have had a 1st down at the 21. i think i like my chances with fitz. I agree. That was complete BS. They didn't even bother to review it becuase the game was running late. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
REEGSKINS Posted February 2, 2009 Share Posted February 2, 2009 Why are people so mad about an irrelivant play??? why is it irrelevant? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Westbrook36 Posted February 2, 2009 Share Posted February 2, 2009 What the hell is everyone talking about, incomplete pass? The defender had his hand/arm on the ball when Warner's arm was on the way back. The ball was coming out and Warner simply couldn't push his arm/shoulder forward if he tried. It was as clear of a fumble as you could have had. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skinned em' Posted February 2, 2009 Share Posted February 2, 2009 :rotflmao: Friends skinned em' has not made any friends yet And~ "wicked witch" you won't have any Don't dis' Kansas~ got my drift~:mad: dont dis kansas? ok my gut is hurting from laughing at u/ i appreciate it though. I really do. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kevin11 Posted February 2, 2009 Share Posted February 2, 2009 What the hell is everyone talking about, incomplete pass? The defender had his hand/arm on the ball when Warner's arm was on the way back. The ball was coming out and Warner simply couldn't push his arm/shoulder forward if he tried. It was as clear of a fumble as you could have had. If Brady can get that Tuck Rule, warner can at least get a review. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
21Knock_U_Out Posted February 2, 2009 Share Posted February 2, 2009 What the hell is everyone talking about, incomplete pass? The defender had his hand/arm on the ball when Warner's arm was on the way back. The ball was coming out and Warner simply couldn't push his arm/shoulder forward if he tried. It was as clear of a fumble as you could have had. The ball didnt come out till the arm was going FORWARD. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thinking Skins Posted February 2, 2009 Share Posted February 2, 2009 why is it irrelevant? because it wasn't going to have an impact on the outcome of the game. at best it woulda gave them a chance for a hail mary, and how often do they work? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skinsfan07 Posted February 2, 2009 Share Posted February 2, 2009 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skinned em' Posted February 2, 2009 Share Posted February 2, 2009 That's what they say; personally' date=' I think the refs stimulus package won~ the Steelers didn't win this~ the refs won this for them with their calls~Prove me wrong [/quote'] Umm. well the guy in the black jersey caught one hell of a pass to take the lead in the 4th with like 35 seconds to go:silly:. That convinced me. But hey, what do I know... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
REEGSKINS Posted February 2, 2009 Share Posted February 2, 2009 I agree. That was complete BS. They didn't even bother to review it becuase the game was running late. the league should be ashamed. how cant they review. i might be wrong but i think the rule is if there is a play that is a close call under 2 minutes it will be reviewed. was that not close or something? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Westbrook36 Posted February 2, 2009 Share Posted February 2, 2009 If Brady can get that Tuck Rule, warner can at least get a review. Apples and oranges. Warner wasn't trying to tuck the ball. It was a clear fumble. But ok, give him the review.....does it matter? No way thats overturned. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
21Knock_U_Out Posted February 2, 2009 Share Posted February 2, 2009 because it wasn't going to have an impact on the outcome of the game. at best it woulda gave them a chance for a hail mary, and how often do they work? Well with the unsportsman like penalty they would have been up around the 20 or so. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Westbrook36 Posted February 2, 2009 Share Posted February 2, 2009 The ball didnt come out till the arm was going FORWARD. I disagree. The replays agree with me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fasttimes Posted February 2, 2009 Share Posted February 2, 2009 because it wasn't going to have an impact on the outcome of the game. at best it woulda gave them a chance for a hail mary, and how often do they work? It would be far from a Hail Mary, they were at the 30. And thats besides the point. Its not like it was a 2 score game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fasttimes Posted February 2, 2009 Share Posted February 2, 2009 I disagree. The replays agree with me. Maybe, but that still doesn't mean they shouldnt have review it because on the several replays they showed it looked close enough to have them go under the hood. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Westbrook36 Posted February 2, 2009 Share Posted February 2, 2009 Well with the unsportsman like penalty they would have been up around the 20 or so. No they wouldn't. Review your math. Add 15 from the original line of scrimmage. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
REEGSKINS Posted February 2, 2009 Share Posted February 2, 2009 because it wasn't going to have an impact on the outcome of the game. at best it woulda gave them a chance for a hail mary, and how often do they work? you are mistaken. there was a 15 yard penalty on the play for a player taking off his helmet on the field. i believe the cards would have had the ball on the 21 or 20 yard line. dont u like fitz's chances there? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
21Knock_U_Out Posted February 2, 2009 Share Posted February 2, 2009 I disagree. The replays agree with me. Well I disagree with you.......maybe they should have reviewd it? Hmmmmm........... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thinking Skins Posted February 2, 2009 Share Posted February 2, 2009 Well with the unsportsman like penalty they would have been up around the 20 or so. there was an unsportsmanlike penalty? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skinned em' Posted February 2, 2009 Share Posted February 2, 2009 i thought the safety was ifffy, wasnt much of a hold there. But it wasnt the skins on the wrong side of the call, so I dont really care. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
D'KanSkinFan Posted February 2, 2009 Share Posted February 2, 2009 :rotflmao:dont dis kansas? ok my gut is hurting from laughing at u/ i appreciate it though. I really do. Really Well, manners tells me to congrat you for your Steelers win, but my bad, I forgot my manners "Witch of the Stimulus" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
21Knock_U_Out Posted February 2, 2009 Share Posted February 2, 2009 No they wouldn't. Review your math. Add 15 from the original line of scrimmage. What was the OLS? 40? 20 yd line OR SO Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kevin11 Posted February 2, 2009 Share Posted February 2, 2009 there was an unsportsmanlike penalty?Brett Keisel taking his helmet off after the play was over. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.