darrelgreenie Posted November 21, 2008 Share Posted November 21, 2008 Ever since i heard that ARE was banged up (WR Antwaan Randle El will rest with a low-ankle sprain for a few days, but Zorn was optimistic about his status.) i've been hoping he wouldn't be ready for this game. I know, i know its wrong. But the guy is already hurt, I just want him to take his time and be 100%. If it means he misses this game, so be it. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/11/19/AR2008111903860.html Look it, I'm itching to see Devin Thomas and Malcolm Kelly get their chances and what better game then the Seahawks? They have one of the worst pass defenses in the NFL. Who would you rather see against the Seahawks? A banged up ARE or Devin Thomas and Malcolm Kelly? Thoughts? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rexx1240 Posted November 21, 2008 Share Posted November 21, 2008 DT and MK. Only cuz im anxious to see them get sum real action and bcuz Seattle's secondary is not exactly in the top five so this should perfect for them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Santana_Fan Posted November 21, 2008 Share Posted November 21, 2008 I hope to see Kelly in his spot if he isn't able to play. Put DeAngelo on punt returns. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MonkFan8 Posted November 21, 2008 Share Posted November 21, 2008 ARE just isn't a top WR in this league anymore (One could argue he never was in the first place). I'd be much happier letting DT and MK split time at #2. Given the choice as of right now I'd give the nod to Thomas. Kelly still needs time to get his legs under him and get the offense down. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gkekoa Posted November 21, 2008 Share Posted November 21, 2008 We would be better suited to have Thrash hurt because he didn't make a catch last week as a #2 WR. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smashmouth1980 Posted November 21, 2008 Share Posted November 21, 2008 I hope to see Kelly in his spot if he isn't able to play. Put DeAngelo on punt returns. I like that one. Interesting...would really rest ARE on punt returns anyway. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CRobi21 Posted November 21, 2008 Share Posted November 21, 2008 Whoever is healthy, and will help the team the most. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cherick Posted November 21, 2008 Share Posted November 21, 2008 Moss, Devin and Kelly. Let Randle El rest. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Santana_Fan Posted November 21, 2008 Share Posted November 21, 2008 I like that one. Interesting...would really rest ARE on punt returns anyway. Randle El plays around too much on punt returns. DeAngelo goes upfield first. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smashmouth1980 Posted November 21, 2008 Share Posted November 21, 2008 N and S runner...your'e right. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
phatboy41 Posted November 21, 2008 Share Posted November 21, 2008 Hard to say... I think ARE at this phase is much better than MK for obvious reasons. The main one being: experience. If ARE is very banged up I would say to rest him so we can get him back for more difficult games and depending on MK's knowledge of the offense and his 'injury progress' or lack there of we should put him in. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wyvern Posted November 21, 2008 Share Posted November 21, 2008 IMO, Kelly would be a better "vicinity" receiver than ARE. Sooner or later, we've got to use these tall WRs we drafted. (Hopefully, Hixon's finally got them 'coached up." Kelly at the #2 WR, could make things interesting, especially if he can catch Campbell's passes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ray Brown Posted November 21, 2008 Share Posted November 21, 2008 honestly, when was the last time D. Hall returned a punt?? i don't think it has been recently. college mainly i think. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smashmouth1980 Posted November 21, 2008 Share Posted November 21, 2008 ^^^can't be any worse than Randle El is doing now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Santana_Fan Posted November 21, 2008 Share Posted November 21, 2008 ^^^can't be any worse than Randle El is doing now. Exactly Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stew Posted November 21, 2008 Share Posted November 21, 2008 Moss, Kelly and Thrash. I dont put much stock in Thomas and hope he proves me wrong. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
twenty-eight Posted November 21, 2008 Share Posted November 21, 2008 Moss, Thrash, & Thomas Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ST is my boy Posted November 21, 2008 Share Posted November 21, 2008 ARE just isn't a top WR in this league anymore (One could argue he never was in the first place). I'd be much happier letting DT and MK split time at #2. Given the choice as of right now I'd give the nod to Thomas. Kelly still needs time to get his legs under him and get the offense down. I definitly dont think he is a TOP wr in the league either. But I do think he has the best hands on the team out of the recievers....no question. Im suprised people are so fast to just take him out of the lineup. I think hes been a good player for us.....he moves the chains. I think we need him in there for sure....until Devin and Malcom are developed... If hes hurt fine.....but if he can play....I believe we need him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chachie Posted November 21, 2008 Share Posted November 21, 2008 Just leave Devin out. I've seen enough. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zCommander Posted November 21, 2008 Share Posted November 21, 2008 What is the diff. between these two choices?? Moss, Thomas, Kelly Moss, Kelly, Thomas Are you indicating whether one should be a 2nd or 3rd WR? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
darrelgreenie Posted November 21, 2008 Author Share Posted November 21, 2008 What is the diff. between these two choices??Moss, Thomas, Kelly Moss, Kelly, Thomas Are you indicating whether one should be a 2nd or 3rd WR? #1/X, #2/Z, #3/Slot Yep Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ST is my boy Posted November 21, 2008 Share Posted November 21, 2008 #1/X, #2/Z, #3/SlotYep Actually I think #1 is Z. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bulldog Posted November 22, 2008 Share Posted November 22, 2008 Activate Kelly to be the #3 receiver. Keep Thomas active to return punts Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mhensl1 Posted November 22, 2008 Share Posted November 22, 2008 Moss and Kelly are # 1 and 2. ARE if healthy plays the slot...if not thomas plays the slot Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tml6157 Posted November 22, 2008 Share Posted November 22, 2008 I wish we could find somewhere to trade Randle El in the offseason. I like him very much as a player but he makes WAY too much money for the little he has produced. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.