SkinsMaster88 Posted November 22, 2008 Share Posted November 22, 2008 As much potential as Kelly has with observations from training camp and practice, I would not be comfortable with him as the #2 in his first main NFL game after being out for an extended period of time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Springfield Posted November 22, 2008 Share Posted November 22, 2008 Randel El is no good when he's banged up. I'd rather give the (finally) healthy young WR's a chance and let El rest. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shilsu Posted November 22, 2008 Share Posted November 22, 2008 ARE is overpaid no doubt (he will be making more than Santana Moss next year!), but he gets too much flak for supposedly being unable to fill the #2 role. How many teams have a better #2 option? Some do. Most don't. ARE is just average to above average. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zCommander Posted November 22, 2008 Share Posted November 22, 2008 #1/X, #2/Z, #3/SlotYep That is what I thought. Thanks. He should be #3 then. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RenegadeTK Posted November 22, 2008 Share Posted November 22, 2008 moss, thomas, kelly.... mostly outta curiousity Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
darrelgreenie Posted November 22, 2008 Author Share Posted November 22, 2008 moss, thomas, kelly.... mostly outta curiousity or even Moss-X, Thomas-Z, combo of ARE/Kelly in the slot I hope Thomas and Kelly actually see more playing time and its not just Zorn tease/ media buzz. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MustangSteve Posted November 22, 2008 Share Posted November 22, 2008 Ever since i heard that ARE was banged up (WR Antwaan Randle El will rest with a low-ankle sprain for a few days, but Zorn was optimistic about his status.) i've been hoping he wouldn't be ready for this game. I know, i know its wrong. But the guy is already hurt, I just want him to take his time and be 100%. If it means he misses this game, so be it.http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/11/19/AR2008111903860.html Look it, I'm itching to see Devin Thomas and Malcolm Kelly get their chances and what better game then the Seahawks? They have one of the worst pass defenses in the NFL. Who would you rather see against the Seahawks? A banged up ARE or Devin Thomas and Malcolm Kelly? Thoughts? It's obvious Thomas isnt smart enough to learn a playbook, when other rookies in the league have excelled for their teams. So I definately want to see what Kelly can bring to our offense, hoping it's much more then Thomas has produced, which wouldn't be hard to do. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Slateman Posted November 22, 2008 Share Posted November 22, 2008 Moss, Kelly, and Thomas Honestly, Randel El has been a huge disappointment. I'd rather Kelly and Thomas get some playing time and figure out what they need to do next offseason to get better. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Evilskinzfan47 Posted November 22, 2008 Share Posted November 22, 2008 When you refuse to take the shots down field, i dont think it really matters. If, and i do mean IF, we win this game.it'll be a nail biter.Close game against an inferior team. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
darrelgreenie Posted November 22, 2008 Author Share Posted November 22, 2008 When you refuse to take the shots down field, i dont think it really matters.If, and i do mean IF, we win this game.it'll be a nail biter.Close game against an inferior team. I'm hoping against hope that's not the case. B/c if we can't get our passing game going against the Seahawks how do we make the playoffs? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Muzzah Posted November 22, 2008 Share Posted November 22, 2008 Moss, Thomas, Thrash. I doubt MK is anywhere near ready to be running routes in the offense every down. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Taylor4Life Posted November 22, 2008 Share Posted November 22, 2008 Our passing game couldnĀ“t be any worse right now. Judging from the reports that are out there, I think Zorn realizes this and is willing to change things up in order to get this thing moving. At 6-2, I understood the coaching staff taking the safe route and going with the experience. 6-4 is a whole different beast, however. I would LOVE to see us at least ATTEMPT a fade route to Kelly in the corner of the end zone. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wpenn1 Posted November 22, 2008 Share Posted November 22, 2008 ARE is overpaid no doubt (he will be making more than Santana Moss next year!), but he gets too much flak for supposedly being unable to fill the #2 role. How many teams have a better #2 option? Some do. Most don't. ARE is just average to above average. lets see 1. Cincinnati 2. Arizona 3. Dallas 4. Green Bay 5. New England 6. Indianapolis 7. Philadelphia 8. Pittsburgh 9. Carolina 10. Houston 11. Denver 12. N.Y. Jets 13. New Orleans 14. Miami Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
str8jacket8 Posted November 23, 2008 Share Posted November 23, 2008 I would like to see the rookies do something. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.