E-Dog Night Posted October 13, 2007 Share Posted October 13, 2007 http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/news/story?id=3060689 Sources: Forthcoming Mitchell report will be 'huge story' By Buster Olney ESPN The Magazine Since former Senator George Mitchell launched his investigation into baseball's steroid past 18 months ago, the big questions have been whether the final report would name names, and how many names would be named, and how important the names would be. Some officials came away from a 30-team Major League Baseball conference call held mid-day Friday with the understanding that the forthcoming Mitchell report would include many names; names which have so far not been disclosed publicly; and the names of well-known players. According to those familiar with the conference call, Tom Carlucci, a lawyer for MLB, told the team representatives on the conference call that the report is going to be "salacious." Said one source familiar with what was said on the conference call, "This is going to be enormous ... it's going to be a huge story when these names come out." Carlucci, part of the San Francisco-based firm of Foley and Lardner, indicated on the call, according to sources, that the report would come down sometime between the conclusion of the World Series and the beginning of the new year. Click on above link for rest of article ...any guesses? I'll take Mcguire & Sosa for starters. It will be interesting to see how many World Series winners will be in that report. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jbooma Posted October 13, 2007 Share Posted October 13, 2007 It will be very interesting who is on this list. Would not be surprised if people like Clemens, ARod, Tejada and a ton of pitchers will be on this list. Should be interesting to say the least Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aREDSKIN Posted October 13, 2007 Share Posted October 13, 2007 As there will be a lot of, WHO?? No name types too if it's a prevalent as some speculate. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skinfan2k Posted October 13, 2007 Share Posted October 13, 2007 i thikn we will see david ortiz and johan santana Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheDoyler23 Posted October 13, 2007 Share Posted October 13, 2007 The report will name names meaning....what? That someone else said they took roids? That they failed a test before the tougher standards? That they received HGH? What extent does naming names even mean? And if the person hasn't failed a test or admitted it, who cares? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
portisizzle Posted October 13, 2007 Share Posted October 13, 2007 sorry, I assume everyone in MLB used or uses. The report will have no additional affect on me. If anything, once I feel that MLB is "somewhat" clean I might actually start buying tickets again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
squatch66 Posted October 14, 2007 Share Posted October 14, 2007 obviously the big three of bonds, mcgwire, and sosa. clemens i think could be a possibility too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Duckus Posted October 14, 2007 Share Posted October 14, 2007 And if the person hasn't failed a test or admitted it, who cares? See Bary Bonds. People will care. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheDoyler23 Posted October 14, 2007 Share Posted October 14, 2007 See Bary Bonds. People will care. Barry Bonds admitted to using the cream and clear. He's already a proven user. Now, the Mitchell investigation may have more information about Barry, but he's already in the "confirmed user" category. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jbooma Posted October 14, 2007 Share Posted October 14, 2007 The report will name names meaning....what? That someone else said they took roids? That they failed a test before the tougher standards? That they received HGH? What extent does naming names even mean? And if the person hasn't failed a test or admitted it, who cares? You are just saying that because you are scared how many O's were on the juice :laugh: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheDoyler23 Posted October 14, 2007 Share Posted October 14, 2007 You are just saying that because you are scared how many O's were on the juice :laugh: Not really. Like I said, unless the player fails a test or admits to use, it doesn't matter. The investigation is just hearsay from person to person, not actual evidence. Since so many players did them anyway, the whole era is tainted regardless of guilt or innocence. I don't care what Orioles will be named, especially since this whole investigation is such a farce anyway. And besides, there are 4 teams in the playoffs right now. I GUARANTEE that at least one player from each team us using something illegal RIGHT NOW. As long as people are in competition, some people will look to gain an advantage. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jbooma Posted October 14, 2007 Share Posted October 14, 2007 Not really. Like I said, unless the player fails a test or admits to use, it doesn't matter. The investigation is just hearsay from person to person, not actual evidence. Since so many players did them anyway, the whole era is tainted regardless of guilt or innocence. I don't care what Orioles will be named, especially since this whole investigation is such a farce anyway. And besides, there are 4 teams in the playoffs right now. I GUARANTEE that at least one player from each team us using something illegal RIGHT NOW. As long as people are in competition, some people will look to gain an advantage. If you have HGH being sent to the players then that is not hearsay but actual evidence. We do not know what information they have but will find out soon. Since there is no HGH test in MLB this is they only way the can connect players with it. Now this can be huge news if they name potential or players already in the hall we never suspected. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
redwoody86 Posted October 14, 2007 Share Posted October 14, 2007 Well we sure won't be finding Eric Gagne's name on that list. :laugh: :laugh: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
No_Pressure Posted October 15, 2007 Share Posted October 15, 2007 Giambi for sure. "Oh, I have a stomach sickness that is going to make me lose 40 pounds of muscle and stop hitting the ball!" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
praise_gibbs Posted October 15, 2007 Share Posted October 15, 2007 Well we sure won't be finding Eric Gagne's name on that list. :laugh: :laugh: BWAHAHAHAHA! Eric Gagne! HA! But, on a serious note. Manny Ramirez will be my pick for the surprise player to make the list. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skinfan2k Posted October 15, 2007 Share Posted October 15, 2007 manny lol? ya right. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rincewind Posted October 15, 2007 Share Posted October 15, 2007 Cal Ripken. **** that guy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
praise_gibbs Posted October 15, 2007 Share Posted October 15, 2007 manny lol? ya right. That is why I said surprise. You aren't supposed to expect it or believe it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
praise_gibbs Posted October 15, 2007 Share Posted October 15, 2007 Cal Ripken. **** that guy. :rotflmao: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jbooma Posted October 15, 2007 Share Posted October 15, 2007 That is why I said surprise. You aren't supposed to expect it or believe it. Like when they bust Derek Jeter :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: Arod slipped it in his coffee :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
squatch66 Posted October 17, 2007 Share Posted October 17, 2007 You are just saying that because you are scared how many O's were on the juice :laugh: *cough*bradyanderson*cough* and miguel tejada and javy lopez it hurts to say javy lopez because he played for the braves. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mufumonk Posted October 17, 2007 Share Posted October 17, 2007 Piazza no doubt. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kilmer17 Posted October 17, 2007 Share Posted October 17, 2007 F@#K YOU Mike Mussina! (Yes, I know wrong thread so sue me) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Evil Genius Posted October 17, 2007 Share Posted October 17, 2007 If a large percentage of the names named are pitchers - what does that mean? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jbooma Posted October 17, 2007 Share Posted October 17, 2007 If a large percentage of the names named are pitchers - what does that mean? it means a large percentage of the names are pitchers Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.