Jump to content
Washington Football Team Logo
Extremeskins
Forum Rules and Guidelines

Redskins Camp Preview

Brandon Lloyd Christmas

By Brandon Lloyd Christmas
in The Stadium

Recommended Posts

Brandon Lloyd Christmas

Brandon Lloyd Christmas

Posted
Posted

Per ESPN insider:

Three Burning Questions

1. Can Clinton Portis and Ladell Betts flourish by sharing carries in 2007?

Portis missed a lot of time in 2006 due to shoulder and hand injuries. Betts did a great job filling in, averaging 128 rushing yards in the season's last five games after being primarily a third-down back for most of his career. Portis has better running skills both inside and on his patented stretch play, and he is an underrated pass blocker. Betts has improved his shiftiness and moves, and he is an excellent third back as a receiver. Portis gives the Redskins explosive big-play potential, while Betts gives them stability and consistency. It would not be surprising to see more than 2,000 yards rushing from this tandem in 2007. Portis loves running behind Washington's zone-blocking schemes. Offensive coordinator Al Saunders has the challenge of designing an offensive approach that caters to both of these backs.

2. Can the Redskins' first-round draft pick, DS LaRon Landry, impact the defense?</B>

The No. 6 pick overall, Landry is a great addition and gives the Redskins' defense flexibility in its alignment and schemes. Sean Taylor has been playing strong safety, which requires him to play in the box too much, negating his athleticism and range, especially in coverage. In the minicamps, the coaches had Landry at strong safety, since he is comfortable playing in the box as well as covering tight ends and backs. Taylor lined up at free safety, where he can use his speed to make more plays in space. If Landry can handle the strong safety role as a rookie, it not only would give Washington a great safety tandem but also would mean more flexibility for the secondary.

. Can Todd Wade have success in a move from ROT to LOG?

The Redskins' offensive line played very well in 2006, but the departure of LOG Derrick Dockery in free agency is really a cause for concern. Wade gets the first shot, moving from his natural tackle spot to the inside. Unfortunately, he has had injury problems and has never played guard; plus, at 6-foot-8, he may be too tall to be an inside player. If Wade falters, the Redskins will look to Mike Pucillo, William Whitticker and Taylor Whitley, but none of the three look like 16-game starters. Wade has a chance, because Washington's zone-blocking schemes can hide his limited athleticism. This is a unit that allowed only 19 sacks in 2006 and created plenty of holes in the run game. The last thing the Redskins want to do is upset the chemistry they have created.

The player under the microscope

QB Jason Campbell. He started seven games in 2006, and with a good offseason he is now ready to take over. He has excellent poise and toughness and real leadership skills in the huddle. However, there is room to improve in terms of his completion percentage and accuracy on the deep ball. There is a lot of pressure for this franchise to win now, and a lot of that falls on Campbell's shoulders. If he falters, the only other option is Mark Brunell, and we have been down that road before. With a good offseason and better familiarity with his receivers, Campbell should be an improved quarterback in 2007.

Breakout player

SS Sean Taylor. How can a player who earned Pro Bowl status last season be in the breakout category? When you watch film, you see a guy who did not play with a lot of confidence, especially in coverage, even though he is a fantastic physical talent. With the selection of LaRon Landry in the first round of this year's draft, the coaches are experimenting with playing Landry at strong safety and Taylor at free safety, where he can make more open-field plays instead of playing in the box too much like he did last year. That could lead to huge production.

Comeback player of the year

WR Santana Moss. He was hindered by a hamstring injury in 2006, and his production dropped almost 700 yards from his huge 2005 season. He still has big-play capabilities, and his signature play is the bubble screen, where he can turn a short catch into a huge play. He should have Steve Smith-like production, but his fellow receivers don't take a lot of attention away, and he must stay healthy to be a big factor. He is now getting a full offseason with Campbell, and that should translate into big numbers in 2007.

Offensive philosophy

Last year, it seemed the offensive philosophies of head coach Joe Gibbs and offensive coordinator Al Saunders clashed, and that is something that must be worked out in 2007. Gibbs prefers a low-risk, power-running game that wears down defenses, while Saunders prefers to utilize complicated schemes with movement and motion, with some elements of trickery and gadget plays. The solution is somewhere in the middle. With Porter and Betts poised to give them that power run game, it will open up the deep passing game and give Saunders the matchups he wants underneath. With a young QB at the helm, the offense will pull back a little bit and become a run-first, pass-second unit. The Redskins will stay with their patented zone-blocking schemes, utilized so well by their offensive line, and they could be a powerful but somewhat unpredictable offense in 2007.

Defensive philosophy

Defensive coordinator Gregg Williams has a reputation for being an innovator, but in 2006 he seemed to become somewhat predictable and just didn't seem to have the same magic in his defensive calls. He will play man-to-man coverages behind a zone blitz, and he loves to use a lot of line stunts and movement. What he must do better is disguise those blitzes and coverages, but it requires smart players who can execute the plan, and that wasn't always the case last season. Critics will tell you that Williams stayed in a base Cover 2 defense in 2006, with too many blitzes on third down. Offenses seemed to have a better idea of how to attack the Redskins than in the past. Look for Williams to go back to taking more chances in an effort to create turnovers and big plays, and he must get his players to do a better job of buying into his system, which was not always the case last season.

Camp battle to watch

LDC Carlos Rogers vs. LDC Fred Smoot

Rogers was the Redskins' top draft pick in 2005, and while he shows flashes of outstanding cover skills, he makes too many mental mistakes and seems to have trouble letting a bad play go. Smoot has elite cover skills, but he is coming off a couple of uneven and troubled years in Minnesota. If he cannot beat out Rogers in the preseason, he likely will play the nickel corner and cover the slot receiver; in this role, his quickness could be a huge attribute. There is also the fact that the other cornerback, Shawn Springs, is 32 years old, and his durability could become a question mark. If this wasn't enough competition, free agent David Macklin is also in the mix. He is a Cover 2 corner with a lot of savvy, and he rarely makes mistakes. Macklin could emerge as the most reliable defender in this group. The coaches have a very interesting puzzle to solve at this position in the summer, but the talent is certainly there

Fantasy take

The Redskins signed Ladell Betts to a large extension in the offseason, meaning he'll be a large part of the running game. How the Redskins split carries between Betts and Clinton Portis -- who must prove he is healthy -- will determine where you need to draft both players.

http://insider.espn.go.com/nfl/trainingcamp07/insider/news/story?id=2936560

Link to comment
Share on other sites
fdarugar

fdarugar

Posted
Posted

Rogers vs. Smoot vs. Macklin is a very intriguing battle. It looks like a line up which is 100 times better than what we had going into last season, hopefully our upgraded DB situation will help our dreadful DL. Which I am surprised was not brought up in this article.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
SWFLSkins

SWFLSkins

Posted
Posted
"With Porter and Betts poised to give them that power run game, it will open up the deep passing game and give Saunders the matchups he wants underneath."

any of these people proof read their work..

____________________________

Does a sentence end with two periods? Or start without capitalization? :laugh: :rolleyes: :laugh:

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Tastes Like Chicken

Tastes Like Chicken

Posted
Posted
Rogers vs. Smoot vs. Macklin is a very intriguing battle. It looks like a line up which is 100 times better than what we had going into last season, hopefully our upgraded DB situation will help our dreadful DL. Which I am surprised was not brought up in this article.

Jerametrius Butler isnt exactly chopped liver, surprised by his omission in the discussion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
ntotoro

ntotoro

Posted
Posted
Wade has a chance, because Washington's zone-blocking schemes can hide his limited athleticism.

The guy he's replacing (King Belly Flop) wasn't exactly known for athleticism.

The main advantage Hickory Dickory Dockery had was that he was the devil we already knew. We don't know what we'll have with Wade.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
TheLongshot

TheLongshot

Posted
Posted
Jerametrius Butler isnt exactly chopped liver, surprised by his omission in the discussion.

Probably because since his injury, he hasn't been nearly as good. He's a wild card in the situation.

It was a bit disappointing that they didn't even talk about injuries in the defensive analysis. That was a big part of what limited Williams in what he could do with the defense.

As for the OL, like all of us, they don't know what the team has for backups. Why are they saying that none of the backups look like 16 game starters? Based on what?

Jason

Link to comment
Share on other sites
DCsportsfan53

DCsportsfan53

Posted
Posted
Rogers vs. Smoot vs. Macklin is a very intriguing battle. It looks like a line up which is 100 times better than what we had going into last season, hopefully our upgraded DB situation will help our dreadful DL. Which I am surprised was not brought up in this article.
Jerametrius Butler isnt exactly chopped liver, surprised by his omission in the discussion.

I was just going to say, if Butler is healthy, he might well be our best CB. He's only played 7 games in the last 2 seasons but he's only 28 years old and was REALLY coming on as a player before those 2 injury filled seasons. In 04, he managed 79 tackles, 19 passes defensed and 5 interceptions. I think the CB depth will FINALLY allow Gregg Williams to go back to the defense he was calling in 04. Even in 05, we didn't trust Walt Harris deep so we played less man, less press coverage and more zone coverage. Now we can go back to the press man Cover 1 with Sean Taylor roaming deep and mixing up zones, man and blitzes with the underneath coverage. I really can't wait to see this defense in action, they're going to really surprise people this year.

As far as the rest of the article, I thought it was a very reasonable and objective breakdown of the team's situation heading into training camp. A lot more realistic and in depth than most we've seen this offseason and you could tell that he came up with this through actually watching films instead of just stat lines.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
bubba9497

bubba9497

Posted
Posted
I suprised they didn't mention needing more production out of Lloyd and ARE.

TheFan

not nearly as surprising as him leaving out the Pokes OL questions in their preview

If The other points come to fruition, ARE and Lloyd numbers should increase

Link to comment
Share on other sites
zCommander

zCommander

Posted
Posted
____________________________

Does a sentence end with two periods? Or start without capitalization? :laugh: :rolleyes: :laugh:

:applause: :applause: :applause: :applause: :applause: :applause: :applause: :applause: I guess some people read letter by letter. I didn't even see Portis was misspelled. Who cares. What the article is talking about is more important!

Thanks for the Inside!:notworthy

Link to comment
Share on other sites
TheFan

TheFan

Posted
Posted
not nearly as surprising as him leaving out the Pokes OL questions in their preview

If The other points come to fruition, ARE and Lloyd numbers should increase

Did they not mention the OL? I haven't seen the Dallas preview. Anyway, I was talking about the Skins here.

I was kind of suprised when I looked at their career stats though. Neither has had particularly huge seasons. Do you think this will be a breakout season for one or both of them if the "other points come to fruition"?

TheFan

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...