ceviker Posted October 30, 2006 Share Posted October 30, 2006 Provide a link or source of rumor, or don't post at all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghost of Posted October 30, 2006 Share Posted October 30, 2006 The other thing is that someone who is more willing to believe Saunders is the problem (first place he's ever been where he's the 'problem' lol) is going to be more likely to invent or latch onto something like that. I wouldn't expect Campbell to look great, it's not as if he's been getting tons of snaps all year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ddub52 Posted October 30, 2006 Share Posted October 30, 2006 WDYT - If Gibbs were to replace Brunell when would we hear something? Why would Gibbs replace Brunell?... I was thinking Campbell would replace Brunell Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Riggins Seventy Chip Posted October 30, 2006 Author Share Posted October 30, 2006 ****! From Jason C: http://blog.washingtonpost.com/redskinsinsider/ Okay, Coach Joe says it's too early to determine Sunday's status for most of the injured guys. Brunell says he will practice Wednesday and is good to go for the Cowboys. Campbell split snaps with Collins today and had the bulk of the work last week. But Gibbs says the rotation on Sunday will be the same - Brunell 1, Collins as the backup and Jason as the No. 3. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ceviker Posted October 30, 2006 Share Posted October 30, 2006 Mother ****er! God Damn This ****ing ****! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jsevier Posted October 30, 2006 Share Posted October 30, 2006 ****!From Jason C: http://blog.washingtonpost.com/redskinsinsider/ Okay, Coach Joe says it's too early to determine Sunday's status for most of the injured guys. Brunell says he will practice Wednesday and is good to go for the Cowboys. Campbell split snaps with Collins today and had the bulk of the work last week. But Gibbs says the rotation on Sunday will be the same - Brunell 1, Collins as the backup and Jason as the No. 3. O'h goodness. That blurb should light a fire around here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sekhmet187 Posted October 30, 2006 Share Posted October 30, 2006 Oh well, looks like we get to watch Brunell back peddle into another 6 sack game. If Portis is injured, as well as Moss, then theres no way Washington wins. It'd be a 28-3, type game. And its not looking good for Moss. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PCS Posted October 30, 2006 Share Posted October 30, 2006 We have detonation in 5.......4........3.......2..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jsevier Posted October 30, 2006 Share Posted October 30, 2006 Mother ****er! God Damn This ****ing ****! And the fire has been lit. Remember your thread from earlier Ceviker. Don't lose sight of it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jwpanic Posted October 30, 2006 Share Posted October 30, 2006 ****!From Jason C: http://blog.washingtonpost.com/redskinsinsider/ Okay, Coach Joe says it's too early to determine Sunday's status for most of the injured guys. Brunell says he will practice Wednesday and is good to go for the Cowboys. Campbell split snaps with Collins today and had the bulk of the work last week. But Gibbs says the rotation on Sunday will be the same - Brunell 1, Collins as the backup and Jason as the No. 3. well, at least gibbs is consistant Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LiveStrongSkins Posted October 30, 2006 Share Posted October 30, 2006 It's okay... Let that be the QB rotation. Gibbs just continues to show why he is nothing but an under .500 coach in his second tenure and why we cant control the ball with his lover at QB. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sekhmet187 Posted October 30, 2006 Share Posted October 30, 2006 I'm thinking Moss' hamstring injury will keep him out a game or two, so the fans and Gibbs will get to see what Brunell can do against a very good defense without his favorite target and best WR, and with an ailing RB. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CPortJGibbs89 Posted October 30, 2006 Share Posted October 30, 2006 Oh well, looks like we get to watch Brunell back peddle into another 6 sack game. If Portis is injured, as well as Moss, then theres no way Washington wins.It'd be a 28-3, type game. And its not looking good for Moss. I could see this happening. Damn it BOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Riggins Seventy Chip Posted October 30, 2006 Author Share Posted October 30, 2006 I still think that there is a good possibility of Campbell playing in the Dallas game. If Brunell continues to show inability to work the ball down the field, I think that Campbell comes in, no matter what Gibbs is saying now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
argentina_redskins Posted October 30, 2006 Share Posted October 30, 2006 I'm thinking Moss' hamstring injury will keep him out a game or two, so the fans and Gibbs will get to see what Brunell can do against a very good defense without his favorite target and best WR, and with an ailing RB. U r wrong ... his favorite WR is Ladell Betts and probably da one in his fantasy team ... :doh::doh::doh::doh: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gallntfox Posted October 30, 2006 Share Posted October 30, 2006 It's okay... Let that be the QB rotation. Gibbs just continues to show why he is nothing but an under .500 coach in his second tenure and why we cant control the ball with his lover at QB. That was harsh...but you will get no argument from me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gallntfox Posted October 30, 2006 Share Posted October 30, 2006 I still think that there is a good possibility of Campbell playing in the Dallas game. If Brunell continues to show inability to work the ball down the field, I think that Campbell comes in, no matter what Gibbs is saying now. That can't happen unless Collins comes in for Brunell and is injured. Not likely. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ddub52 Posted October 30, 2006 Share Posted October 30, 2006 I still think that there is a good possibility of Campbell playing in the Dallas game. If Brunell continues to show inability to work the ball down the field, I think that Campbell comes in, no matter what Gibbs is saying now. Yeah. If JC was starting I dont think Joe would say anything yet anyways Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sekhmet187 Posted October 30, 2006 Share Posted October 30, 2006 U r wrong ... his favorite WR is Ladell Betts and probably da one in his fantasy team ... :doh::doh::doh::doh: Actually, Brunell has the fans fooled. When he throws to Betts, he is actually aiming for Moss, but his arm is moving in the direction of Betts. Thats the only way that can explain a QB constantly throwing short of the first down on 3rd down, you see. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DCsportsfan53 Posted October 30, 2006 Share Posted October 30, 2006 That was harsh...but you will get no argument from me. It's awfully painful to agree with you both but I'm going to have to. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris Worthy Posted October 30, 2006 Share Posted October 30, 2006 Campbell took snaps, but didn't look so hot either. Leads me to believe Saunders is the problem. Where do you see that on the blog? :slap: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TC Posted October 30, 2006 Share Posted October 30, 2006 ****!From Jason C: http://blog.washingtonpost.com/redskinsinsider/ Okay, Coach Joe says it's too early to determine Sunday's status for most of the injured guys. Brunell says he will practice Wednesday and is good to go for the Cowboys. Campbell split snaps with Collins today and had the bulk of the work last week. But Gibbs says the rotation on Sunday will be the same - Brunell 1, Collins as the backup and Jason as the No. 3. ****ing ridiculous. I guess now I've got an extra few hours this Sunday to fill, b/c I'm sure as **** done watching Mark Brunell play for the Redskins. He's ruined enough of my Sundays already this year. I hope all of you going to the game boo that worthless, washed up, selfish SOB out of the stadium. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ddub52 Posted October 30, 2006 Share Posted October 30, 2006 That can't happen unless Collins comes in for Brunell and is injured. Not likely. Maybe we could arrange something to have them both injured? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LiveStrongSkins Posted October 30, 2006 Share Posted October 30, 2006 I'm not one to boo i just sit there in disgust... but I imagine the Boo birds will be out early on sunday. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darc Requiem Posted October 30, 2006 Share Posted October 30, 2006 ****!From Jason C: http://blog.washingtonpost.com/redskinsinsider/ Okay, Coach Joe says it's too early to determine Sunday's status for most of the injured guys. Brunell says he will practice Wednesday and is good to go for the Cowboys. Campbell split snaps with Collins today and had the bulk of the work last week. But Gibbs says the rotation on Sunday will be the same - Brunell 1, Collins as the backup and Jason as the No. 3. Well, my brother is a Cowpiles fan. So at least someone in my family will be happy with this news :doh: Well I'm definitely going to be going through a whole 12-pack on Sunday... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.