BigCountry22 Posted September 20, 2006 Share Posted September 20, 2006 Sean Salisbury just did Fact or fiction and said it was a FACT that if Brunell continues to play as he has once Portis comes back the the Skins need to play Campbell and send Brunell to the bench. I know this is just echoing everything said on here, just thought yall would like to know. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mdrun Posted September 20, 2006 Share Posted September 20, 2006 Whats a fact? Your statement wasn't very clear. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Drunken Master III Posted September 20, 2006 Share Posted September 20, 2006 Sean Salisbury just did Fact or fiction and said it was a FACT that if Brunell continues to play as he has once Portis comes back the the Skins need to play Campbell and send Brunell to the bench. I know this is just echoing everything said on here, just thought yall would like to know. Yea I just saw that.... sounds like a plan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skin_finatic Posted September 20, 2006 Share Posted September 20, 2006 sean salisbury knows best!!!!.......I guess Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GibbsFactor Posted September 20, 2006 Share Posted September 20, 2006 Salisbury is... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rcgamer Posted September 20, 2006 Share Posted September 20, 2006 Salisbury is... lol, yeah its like he gos and reads every teams message board and then says whatever everyone on the board is alreasy saying. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skins4481 Posted September 20, 2006 Share Posted September 20, 2006 Sean Salisbury just did Fact or fiction and said it was a FACT that if Brunell continues to play as he has once Portis comes back the the Skins need to play Campbell and send Brunell to the bench. I know this is just echoing everything said on here, just thought yall would like to know. So let me get this straight: If Brunell keeps playing bad we should eventually sit him in favor of Campbell? Thank you! :obvious: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SkinsNoles21 Posted September 20, 2006 Share Posted September 20, 2006 if someone is bad they should get benched. if someone is good they should play. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rdskn4Lyf21 Posted September 20, 2006 Share Posted September 20, 2006 if someone is bad they should get benched.if someone is good they should play. :laugh: I don't know if you are being sarcastic or just......:doh: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
G-Prime Posted September 20, 2006 Share Posted September 20, 2006 We need a game where Portis is back and productive, the Offensive line is solid, yet Brunell still sucks. I think that will remove a lot of doubt about Brunell's inability to move the team. I hope of the 2 previously stated elements exist then whomever is at QB can succeed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mikeyf316 Posted September 20, 2006 Share Posted September 20, 2006 :laugh: I had Salisbury's sentiment days ago. Now that's he's said it, I'm starting to change my mind.:laugh: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CPortJGibbs89 Posted September 20, 2006 Share Posted September 20, 2006 Do you think Joe Gibbs was watching Sean when he said this?? Man I hope so or were doomed...:laugh: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Santana_Fan Posted September 20, 2006 Share Posted September 20, 2006 Do you think Joe Gibbs was watching Sean when he said this?? Man I hope so or were doomed...:laugh: I hope so too Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Taylor 36 Posted September 20, 2006 Share Posted September 20, 2006 Funny, now that the idiot, Salisbury, says something that the I- think- I- know- best- but- can't- even- coach- pee-wee- ball crowd likes, he knows what he is talking about. You know, the same guy who said that there was no way Gibbs was going to make a difference because the game had passed him by; the same guy who said that there was no way the Skins would make the playoffs in 2005, and even bet a cold walk into DC on it. Yeah, you guys got some real credibility backing you up now!!!!:doh: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
XxSpearheadxX Posted September 20, 2006 Share Posted September 20, 2006 Funny, now that the idiot, Salisbury, says something that the I- think- I- know- best- but- can't- even- coach- pee-wee- ball crowd likes, he knows what he is talking about. You know, the same guy who said that there was no way Gibbs was going to make a difference because the game had passed him by; the same guy who said that there was no way the Skins would make the playoffs in 2005, and even bet a cold walk into DC on it. Yeah, you guys got some real credibility backing you up now!!!!:doh: Salisbury does know what he is talking about. Keep harping on a throwaway JOKE. His analysis is what I'm concerned about. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jnhay Posted September 20, 2006 Share Posted September 20, 2006 Sean Salisbury just did Fact or fiction and said it was a FACT that if Brunell continues to play as he has once Portis comes back the the Skins need to play Campbell and send Brunell to the bench. I know this is just echoing everything said on here, just thought yall would like to know. Isn't that really just common sense, at least to anyone who follows football? What an easy question. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jsevier Posted September 20, 2006 Share Posted September 20, 2006 O'h what a suprise. Yet another thread posted so the ones who hated on Brunell can say that they were right. What makes it even worse is that this is Salsbury, who almost everyone despised last year, that said something that goes along with their point of view. Really folks if we start a thread titled "Brunell haters are right," can we post all this mess there? :doh: In Gibbs I trust! :helmet: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SKINZ33 Posted September 20, 2006 Share Posted September 20, 2006 That was a no brainer to us on here. It just adds some more credibility now that ESPN says it, I guess. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dallsux Posted September 20, 2006 Share Posted September 20, 2006 Sean Salisbury just did Fact or fiction and said it was a FACT that if Brunell continues to play as he has once Portis comes back the the Skins need to play Campbell and send Brunell to the bench. I know this is just echoing everything said on here, just thought yall would like to know. That's the first thing that has come out his mouth that I have agreed with in a long time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DaSkinzBaby Posted September 20, 2006 Share Posted September 20, 2006 Funny, now that the idiot, Salisbury, says something that the I- think- I- know- best- but- can't- even- coach- pee-wee- ball crowd likes, he knows what he is talking about. You know, the same guy who said that there was no way Gibbs was going to make a difference because the game had passed him by; the same guy who said that there was no way the Skins would make the playoffs in 2005, and even bet a cold walk into DC on it. Yeah, you guys got some real credibility backing you up now!!!!:doh: Taylor36 I see that you are always making comments like you are better than everyone. Tell me are you a legend in your own mind, or are one of the types that hide behind a computer and monitor throwing insults all the time. I haven't seen one post from you that even resembles a mature and candid remark :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dallsux Posted September 20, 2006 Share Posted September 20, 2006 ...aaaand it begins. :munchout: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Taylor 36 Posted September 20, 2006 Share Posted September 20, 2006 Taylor36 I see that you are always making comments like you are better than everyone. Tell me are you a legend in your own mind, or are one of the types that hide behind a computer and monitor throwing insults all the time. I haven't seen one post from you that even resembles a mature and candid remark :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: Then learn how to read and comprehend!!! But, I guess you feel hate and running one's mouth on pure emotion with no use of logical reasoning and understanding is mature. :doh: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bryan81 Posted September 20, 2006 Share Posted September 20, 2006 Who cares it comes from Sean Salsbury who pretty much anointed the Panthers as the next dynasty. ESPN & all their talking heads suck. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
themurf Posted September 20, 2006 Share Posted September 20, 2006 Sean Salisbury knows what he's talking about. If only he were to walk naked from Bristol to D.C. to share his vast knowledge with the coaching staff ... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Merlin Emrys Posted September 20, 2006 Share Posted September 20, 2006 Sailbury is a tool. Who cares what he says. The dude's NFL career was irrelevant, but he talks on TV as if he's a stud. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.