No_Pressure Posted March 28, 2006 Share Posted March 28, 2006 Gold, White, GoldGold R Helmets White Throwback Jerseys Gold Throwback Pants I like your style. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
No_Pressure Posted March 28, 2006 Share Posted March 28, 2006 You have to ask yourself, why the Redskins feel their fanbase would be more comfortable viewing a lighter color as opposed to a darker color, and what that means about the uniform change. Your right, it is favoring people with white skin, helmets for skulls, and gigantic red letters tatooed on their chest and back!!! All the while it is opression over the exposure of people with Burgundy skin with big white numbers tatooed on their backs and chests. Think about what your saying for a second. You are trying to indicate that white shirts and white pants worn together are a vehicle through which a white man supresses the actions and cultures of others with darker skin. Sit down for a second and consider that with a thinking style like that, everything in the world is racist against everything else. Thin mints from the Girl Scouts are dark dark brown, therefore they are either A. Black supremacists forcing their color and culture on the impressionable minds of the young through the strong racial power of cookies, or B. a white KKK tool, as eating black cookies is a metaphor for killing those of the african american race- therefore teaching countless people to be as violent to such people in real life as they are to the thin mint! Thinking outside of the box is such an inside the box term. Stop taking LSD and posting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
andyburd Posted March 28, 2006 Share Posted March 28, 2006 Has anyone considered the possibility that white on white uniforms are racist in nature? No Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MisterPinstripe Posted March 28, 2006 Share Posted March 28, 2006 It's often our inability to look at a situation outside of our own idealogical perspective and cultural upbringing that condemns us to a narrow and unfulfilling view of the world. I encourage you to reconsider. Think outside of the box. Life is much more interesting without your head in the preverbial sand. It could even be an unconscious racism. The doers have been so conditioned that even their "conditioning has been conditioned".So, Its Key Eh? :dunce: Someone needs to get back on their meds... I say stick with the whites ones for now. I really like how they look, and they seem to play well with them. Mental thing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kevinklein Posted March 28, 2006 Share Posted March 28, 2006 I'm on the White/White bandwagon. I think they look sleek. We'd be fools to abandon something that has treated us so well! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
talk show host Posted March 28, 2006 Share Posted March 28, 2006 I have a theory about why the white on white made us so successful. Simply put, white on white makes you get real dirty. You are battered, bruised, and you have the dirt and grass stained uniform to show for it. It makes you feel tough. It makes you feel like youre playing FOOTBALL, not prancing around like a marching band in clean unis. Just my theory. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Louie 14 Posted March 28, 2006 Share Posted March 28, 2006 W on B = 3 SBs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CPstretch Posted March 28, 2006 Share Posted March 28, 2006 i hoping for the return to the standard uniform of butt kicking...alas white jerseys burgundy pants and white socks... yep. white on white was cool, but i like the classic look Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vi Posted March 28, 2006 Share Posted March 28, 2006 White on white is fine, but I'm missing the burgundy! Mix up all of our options, I say. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ant15fromNJ Posted March 28, 2006 Share Posted March 28, 2006 I really dont care what we wear we are going to win anyway. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheSteve Posted March 28, 2006 Share Posted March 28, 2006 Your right, it is favoring people with white skin, helmets for skulls, and gigantic red letters tatooed on their chest and back!!! All the while it is opression over the exposure of people with Burgundy skin with big white numbers tatooed on their backs and chests.Think about what your saying for a second. You are trying to indicate that white shirts and white pants worn together are a vehicle through which a white man supresses the actions and cultures of others with darker skin. Sit down for a second and consider that with a thinking style like that, everything in the world is racist against everything else. Thin mints from the Girl Scouts are dark dark brown, therefore they are either A. Black supremacists forcing their color and culture on the impressionable minds of the young through the strong racial power of cookies, or B. a white KKK tool, as eating black cookies is a metaphor for killing those of the african american race- therefore teaching countless people to be as violent to such people in real life as they are to the thin mint! Thinking outside of the box is such an inside the box term. Stop taking LSD and posting. Obviously I am thinking outside the box sense it causes you such discomfort. If you were serious, I could give you candy. But you're not, So It's Key Eh. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sumodat Posted March 28, 2006 Share Posted March 28, 2006 You have to ask yourself, why the Redskins feel their fanbase would be more comfortable viewing a lighter color as opposed to a darker color, and what that means about the uniform change. I hate people who view things the way you do!! :mad: It is so sad that people suggest racism when nobody is offended in the first place. Not to mention that your assertion is the most retarted thing I have ever heard!! Get a life and stop trying to stir **** up! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
No_Pressure Posted March 29, 2006 Share Posted March 29, 2006 Obviously I am thinking outside the box sense it causes you such discomfort. If you were serious, I could give you candy. But you're not, So It's Key Eh. I dont get discomfort from people thinking differently, I get discomfort from someone with a racially charged political agenda coming and making an un-needed post on a thread about uniforms because he thinks he has some mind blowing revolutionary "outside the box" idea. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheSteve Posted March 29, 2006 Share Posted March 29, 2006 I hate people who view things the way you do!! :mad: It is so sad that people suggest racism when nobody is offended in the first place. Not to mention that your assertion is the most retarted thing I have ever heard!! Get a life and stop trying to stir **** up! So just because you can't understand nor appreciate the depth of my thinking my assertion is retarted? It's almost rudimentary in its simplicity. Keys to Understanding are not always comfortable my friend. Eisenhower wasn't always the most popular of presidents but he was right sometimes. Why can it not be the same with me? Take off the tinfoil hat. I dont get discomfort from people thinking differently, I get discomfort from someone with a racially charged political agenda coming and making an un-needed post on a thread about uniforms because he thinks he has some mind blowing revolutionary "outside the box" idea. Discomfort is often a feeling we get when we encounter something foriegn that we do not understand. You percieve and judge it as racism because you don't understand. That is the epitome of discomfort; To charactarize something incorrectly because of our own lack of revelation. But, I will enlighten you both. So It's Key Eh. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
21KO Posted March 29, 2006 Share Posted March 29, 2006 if S I K E means what i think, that's hilarious. If not, I'm worried. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MisterPinstripe Posted March 29, 2006 Share Posted March 29, 2006 Alright dude, you were really convincing... I kept wondering what that sign out meant... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rlhjr34 Posted March 29, 2006 Share Posted March 29, 2006 Yeah our colors are BURGUNDY and Gold. Not White and White! Bring back the Burgundy! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CooleyNaMean Posted March 29, 2006 Share Posted March 29, 2006 You can't wear white on white after labor day. What would sportscenter say about us then? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chants Posted March 29, 2006 Share Posted March 29, 2006 TheSteve wrote: It could even be an unconscious racism. The psychology of racism. Interesting theory. What sort of racism is when a team wears white on white, yet calls itself the Browns? Schizophrenic racism? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CapitalDefense Posted March 29, 2006 Share Posted March 29, 2006 I have a theory about why the white on white made us so successful. Simply put, white on white makes you get real dirty. You are battered, bruised, and you have the dirt and grass stained uniform to show for it. It makes you feel tough. It makes you feel like youre playing FOOTBALL, not prancing around like a marching band in clean unis. Just my theory. My theory is that the players picked those white on white uniforms. No matter what we like they are gonna wear what they like, and if they keep winning who can complain? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DCMONEY Posted March 29, 2006 Share Posted March 29, 2006 Throw Back retro's. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rex Tomb Posted March 29, 2006 Share Posted March 29, 2006 Has anyone considered the possibility that white on white uniforms are racist in nature? Uhhhhm...this is the height of hypersensitivity...you have got to be kidding! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
21KillzCowboys Posted March 29, 2006 Share Posted March 29, 2006 Burgundy on burgundy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rex Tomb Posted March 29, 2006 Share Posted March 29, 2006 You have to ask yourself, why the Redskins feel their fanbase would be more comfortable viewing a lighter color as opposed to a darker color, and what that means about the uniform change. This is absolutely absurd and I think you're doing it soley to get a rise out of people. You have got to be kidding. If not, I feel really sorry for you. If you look at everything in terms of race...you must be alot of fun to be around. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CPstretch Posted March 29, 2006 Share Posted March 29, 2006 i want to know why people keep talking about burgundy on burgundy. do you realize how ugly that would look?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.