stupidsuck Posted June 20, 2005 Share Posted June 20, 2005 We have an abundance of good WRs but none seem to be above and beyond the others so how do you think it will pan out by opening day? my call 1.Moss 2.Patten 3.Jacobs 4.Thrash 5.McCants 6.Dyson 7.Brown tough call between Dyson and McCants but I'll give Dar the edge simply because Dyson wasn't on a roster last year Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HailVictory Posted June 20, 2005 Share Posted June 20, 2005 Gibbs loves Thrash and will find a way to keep him in the mix. 1. Moss 2. Patten 3. Jacobs 4. Thrash 5. Dyson 6. Brown McCants gets cut unfortunately. He doesn't play ST like the other bordline candidates Brown, Thrash and Dyson. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stupidsuck Posted June 20, 2005 Author Share Posted June 20, 2005 dang I totally forgot Thrash, how the heck did I do that? Unfortunately I think you may be right about McCants, it's either him or Dyson to be cut. time to edit Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jschlesi Posted June 20, 2005 Share Posted June 20, 2005 Moss Patten Jacobs McCants Dyson Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
larry29 Posted June 21, 2005 Share Posted June 21, 2005 1. moss 2. patten 3. jacobs 4. brown 5. thrash 6. dyson dar gets cut, as bad as I hate it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SkinsTillIDie Posted June 21, 2005 Share Posted June 21, 2005 It's Jacobs' year this year.... I've been saying it for god knows how long. I can feel it. 1. Moss 2. Jacobs 3. Patten 4. Thrash 5. McCants (used primarily in the red zone) 6. Dyson (probably cut...) 7. Brown Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
authentic Posted June 21, 2005 Share Posted June 21, 2005 1. Moss 2. Patten 3. Jacobs 4. Thrash 5. McCants 6. Dyson 7. Brown Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zoony Posted June 21, 2005 Share Posted June 21, 2005 It should be legible, preferably dry erase so changes can be made, and have large writing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MCnDaHouse Posted June 21, 2005 Share Posted June 21, 2005 Not much difference from the others but I see it this way. With perhaps Dyson moving ahead of Thrash. I really think McCants has the ability to be #3 but whether the motivation is there or not I don't know. 1. Moss 2. Patten 3. Jacobs 4. Thrash 5. Dyson 6. McCants 7. Brown MC :cool: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fifty Gut Posted June 21, 2005 Share Posted June 21, 2005 They are counting on Patten proving he deserved to be higher on the Patriots' depth charts all along (although he did lead the team in yards and TDs last season). It'll be Moss, Patten, Jacobs (as he develops further), Thrash, Dyson, McCants, Brown. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SkinsForLife260 Posted June 21, 2005 Share Posted June 21, 2005 I think dyson will be good. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PleaseBlitz Posted June 21, 2005 Share Posted June 21, 2005 I dont really know or care what the depth chart is going to be. Whoever earns it earns it. Hopefully the lack of a "star" makes them all push each other for snaps. I do think that Antonio Brown should have 3 or 4 plays a game designed to go to him. His speed can make an opposing D look silly. Screens, reverses, bombs, whatever, he runs a freaking 4.1 for christs sake. He may not be the best all-around WR on the team, and i cant see him starting or anything like that, but you need to use him somehow. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KDawg Posted June 21, 2005 Share Posted June 21, 2005 As much as I like McCants, I have a STRONG feeling he will not be on the roster... 1. Moss 2. Patten 3. Jacobs 4. Thrash/Brown (Package substitutions) 5. Dyson (package substituion) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jtyler42 Posted June 21, 2005 Share Posted June 21, 2005 I think it will go like this: 1.) Moss - Will establish hisself as a #1 WR 2.) Patten - Edges out Jacobs for #2 3.) Jacobs - Will become solid #3 4.) Dyson - Totally healthy will bump DMac 5.) Brown - Will use in special packages 6.) Thrash - Will become full-time ST'er Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bubba9497 Posted June 21, 2005 Share Posted June 21, 2005 1.Moss 2.Patten 3.Jacobs 4.Dyson 5.McCants 6.Thrash 7.Brown Thrash & Brown saved for special teams Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trevor Posted June 21, 2005 Share Posted June 21, 2005 1. Moss 2. Jacobs 3. Patten 4. Dyson 5. Thrash And perhaps we keep Brown for special teams. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JoeJGibbs Posted June 21, 2005 Share Posted June 21, 2005 Santana Moss will definitely be in the mix as the playmaker. Patten, another guy they will rely on his experience and speed. Coaches seem to really like Jacobs during this offseason. Thrash is a proven great special teamer and just a smart player in general, hes not goin anywhere Gibbs loves him. McCants will be around because he is a HUUUUGE target for Ramsey.. especially in the redzone. Dyson and Brown are my 2 question marks. Dyson has experience but hasnt been on a roster and Antonio Brown is more of a PR than anything else. I dont think they will start the season with SEVEN WR's!!! That's unheard of! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PapaDRoc Posted June 21, 2005 Share Posted June 21, 2005 1.Moss-IMO a "no-brainer" 2.Jacobs-could have a beakout year if stays healthy 3.Patten-was 3rd in New England 4.Dyson-could be McCants, but I think the coaches like Dyson more. 4 spot would most likely be red zone threat. 5.Thrash-reliable 6.Brown-fast, potential deep threat 7.McCants-again.....could be #4, but I'm not too sure the coaches trust him, especially since that thing came out that they are mostly relying on him to play on special teams. But, you never know, if McCants steps it up on ST, he could get more chances to make plays at receiver. We are deep at receiver though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TankRizzo Posted June 21, 2005 Share Posted June 21, 2005 Kind of a cop out, but here we go: 1. Moss 2. Jacobs/Dyson/McCants 3. Patten 4. X 5. Thrash 6. X The losers at 2 will go to 4 and 6. I have them in order of who I think will win the 2 slot. If Dyson is healthy, I think he has as good of a shot as anyone to compete for the 2. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Slammer Posted June 21, 2005 Share Posted June 21, 2005 In Gibbs' post camp media session he spoke very highly of Brown and his abilities at WR, so... 1) Moss 2) Jacobs/Patten 3) Jacobs/Patten 4) Thrash 5) Brown 6) Dyson/McCants The only problem I see with this is it means our top 5 receivers are all below 6' and 200 lbs. So I can't help but think McCants or Dyson sticks and gets in on various packages that require a bigger presence. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RyansRangers Posted June 21, 2005 Share Posted June 21, 2005 I think there will be different packages with different recievers for screens, deep balls, outs...and runnignplays Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.