Berggy9598

There are things you can to contain this offense, like maintain your rush lanes or make them extend the mesh point when they run RPO. Unfortunately those things require cohesion and discipline

This Eagles offense ain’t the one to play when your players on defense have tuned out their coordinator

With as hard as it is to play zone defense consistently in the NFL, our team not only insists on trying to pull it off with press corners, but also refuses to take advantage on the other side of the ball. Fun times!

How does this happen to a team in year 3 with continuity on the roster and the exact same coaching staff?! How does an NFL team look like this?

Not even the ugliest interception Wentz himself has thrown. Great play by Walker.

Is there a fun fact about how many seasons he’s been in the NFL?

Far be it from to deny someone their right to feel marginalized because they don't like the name changed, but could it be that the "woke mob" doesn't actually give a Kentucky fried **** if someone wears Redskins gear?

Thought I’d seen it all with loony transfer sagas involving a Dutch midfielder. Do Barca have kids running their finances?

He won't get in as long as the same old fossils who only understand fame in the literal sense, rather than the technical aspects of the game, are voting on this. An actual scouting report on a left tackle might as well be in a foreign language if someone like Peter King tried to read it. When you get past the obvious first ballot guys who you know are going in before they're even done playing, it's all kind of a joke. Players like Jacoby will always get the short end of the stick cause too few voters are actually football people.

Soccer fans in KC are absolutely shocked we got one of the spots but soccer is extremely popular here and this is one of the best sports towns in the country in general. Amazing culinary city too beyond its BBQ specialty. Now they have 4 years to gentrify the neighborhoods around Arrowhead 😆

Broadening the criteria to purposely make it vague like the people in here are stupid. Look up the address bar in your browser son it doesn’t say 4chan.

Please explain how acknowledging the existence of a same sex relationship is talking about sex with kids? I’ve been to straight weddings that had a 6 year old is a ring bearer. What’s the difference?

Would that be the video of him trying to assault a girl?

Statistically speaking is it more prudent to act in the way of trying to prevent another school shooting or the U.S government sending foot soldiers into every neighborhood in attempt to oppress free citizens?

Its a single NGL with the power to bend the government to its will. Spin it how you want it’s some 3rd world crap going on in this country.

Children had their face shot off in a classroom because politicians chose blood money over pushing through any legislation that might have prevented it.

It's intentional indifference and prioritization of power and money over saving lines. Evil is evil at the end of the day so neither them nor the Chinese government are in a position to talk about human rights.

Who blocks legislation that restricts ease of access?

That's true until you run into Nancy Lanza.

Again, all your little terminologies and mechanics are completely irrelevant to the point I’m trying to make. You’re shifting the focus there because the “criminals will always…”, and “banning doesn’t work” arguments are garbage. The point I was trying to make doesn’t require me to know anything about guns, nor do I want or claim to. The point is that litigation that restricts or denies access works in the case of kids that commit school shootings, or they’d come armed with a lot worse. You made my point for, you don’t even understand that you made my point for me, and I’m a moron 😆

I don’t give a **** about gun terminology and what fires how many rounds. That’s not the point. The point is the AR15 is the weapon of choice in these shootings because of the damage it can do and the ease with which it can be obtained. If he could have got his hands on a more lethal gun, he would have. He didn’t because he couldn’t, which debunks the idea that access barriers and illegality don’t stop “criminals” from obtaining weapons. That’s exactly the point I was making. Thank you for confirming

Its mechanical make up. Why then is there no outrage over automatic weapons being available? They’re a harmless inanimate object right? My mistake. How about an Uzi?

What prevented Ramos from obtaining say an AK47 and killing more people? The same thing that’d have stopped him if AR-15s were made illegal. The idea that school shooters are just criminals that can’t be deterred is garbage. The ease with which they can obtain AR15s is the prime cause of these events. There is absolutely no logic in these pro gun arguments and it’s fairly easy to expose.

Funny that the "criminals will get guns anyway" crowd is also incensed when AR-15s are called assault rifles. Good thing the latter is a complete fallacy or kids like Ramos would be getting their hands on guns that could have allowed him to kill twice as many people. Fortunately, those type of weapons are illegal and almost impossible for a civilian to obtain.

Before all hell breaks loose in here I wasn’t trying to rub it in. Rooting against United and Liverpool in Europe in general is as English as baked beans on toast.