I don't really see him being made out to be an angel, at least not on here. What people ARE saying is that he didn't deserve to essentially be summarily executed. I just don't get (well I sorta do, but I don't want to go too far down that rabbit hole at this particular moment) why people keep feeling the need to throw out qualifiers in these sort of situations. "Yeah, maybe the cop was wrong...but the guy had done <x> in the past and was a <thug/POS/etc>". It really is roundabout victim blaming. The guy was shot in the head by a cop and was no threat to the officer at the time. That really should be the only relevant fact thrown out here.