EagleSteve Posted January 12, 2004 Share Posted January 12, 2004 Originally posted by Tom [Giants fan] Ummmmm, Blazers? You kept it at Trash. Oh wait, Nevermind. Here's to you Tom! No comment on teh Eagles receivers.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghost of Posted January 12, 2004 Share Posted January 12, 2004 LOL jealousy. Gimme Brady any day. Any person who can run halfway well could have run in the 40 yard open spaces McNabb did. The last play was tight, but I'm still amazed at how such a poor team can have home field advantage throughout the playoffs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zen-like Todd Posted January 12, 2004 Share Posted January 12, 2004 He's not a great QB (I DO think he's overrated), but he's doing a great job tonight. 60% completion rate, about 200 yards passing, 100 rushing, 2 TDs, no INTs, with a quarter to go. Considering his WRs and RBs, he deserves the props. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gstahl Posted January 12, 2004 Share Posted January 12, 2004 just seems like they did not plan well for McNabb to be mobile, go figure, or maybe their plan just did not work. Don't know. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghost of Posted January 12, 2004 Share Posted January 12, 2004 Now the Pack is dropping balls and getting stuffed. That's what happens when you don't do a FB dive on the goalline. ANd when you don't maintain your lanes on McNabb. CT Ask Eagles fans in the know, they'll tell you the Eagles WRs ARE open, he's afraid and always has been to throw the intermediate stuff. He's not too bad or scared to throw the long bombgs though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
buckeyeG Posted January 12, 2004 Share Posted January 12, 2004 I sense the big mo changing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NavyDave Posted January 12, 2004 Share Posted January 12, 2004 oh well its panthers v iggles Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Prosperity Posted January 12, 2004 Share Posted January 12, 2004 WR screen? what, did Spurrier go to GB? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NoCalMike Posted January 12, 2004 Share Posted January 12, 2004 Whoever is doing the playcalling for GreenBay needs his head rattled a bit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghost of Posted January 12, 2004 Share Posted January 12, 2004 Originally posted by NoCalMike Whoever is doing the playcalling for GreenBay needs his head rattled a bit. I think that's the problem! :laugh: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EagleSteve Posted January 12, 2004 Share Posted January 12, 2004 Originally posted by Ghost Who Talks LOL jealousy. Gimme Brady any day. Just pulling your chain GWT, my friend. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NoCalMike Posted January 12, 2004 Share Posted January 12, 2004 WHOA, the packers GOT TO MCNABB!?! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TK Posted January 12, 2004 Share Posted January 12, 2004 McMabb goes down :wave: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TC4 Posted January 12, 2004 Share Posted January 12, 2004 Wow they finally sacked McNabb Wonder of wonders Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArmchairRedskin Posted January 12, 2004 Share Posted January 12, 2004 Hehe two sacks in a row. Kewl. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gstahl Posted January 12, 2004 Share Posted January 12, 2004 notice how peyton was studying film every time we was on the bench, farve seems to be just hanging out. Would think the coach would want to look at a bunch of stuff, and make adjustments, but that is just me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Prosperity Posted January 12, 2004 Share Posted January 12, 2004 Nice, and here we thought the game was over at 14-14. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gridironmike Posted January 12, 2004 Share Posted January 12, 2004 I'm sorry guys, I just feel like McNabb is more lucky than he is a consistent playmaker. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TK Posted January 12, 2004 Share Posted January 12, 2004 back to back sacks!! :wavetowel Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
buckeyeG Posted January 12, 2004 Share Posted January 12, 2004 Let's go Favre! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TC4 Posted January 12, 2004 Share Posted January 12, 2004 Time for the Packers to get some points I don't think they have scored since the 1st quarter Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gridironmike Posted January 12, 2004 Share Posted January 12, 2004 Originally posted by gstahl notice how peyton was studying film every time we was on the bench, farve seems to be just hanging out. Would think the coach would want to look at a bunch of stuff, and make adjustments, but that is just me. What hasn't Favre seen in his career? Maybe they caught him resting after he looked at some pics or before they had they developed and sent down. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TK Posted January 12, 2004 Share Posted January 12, 2004 SWEET CATCH !!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gridironmike Posted January 12, 2004 Share Posted January 12, 2004 YEAH baby! Relaxing must work. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghost of Posted January 12, 2004 Share Posted January 12, 2004 Blazers21 Sad thing is, I like McNabb the PERSON. It's too bad he's on the Eagles, but being objective he's just not a very good passer, despite his strong arm. It's true better receivers would make McNabb better, but I think it's.... WALKER SHOULD HAVE RUN IN THE END ZONE!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
![Tom [Giants fan]](http://content.invisioncic.com/Mnflwash/profile/photo-114388.png)
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.