Sign in to follow this  
TK

Press Release: REDSKINS SIGN SAFETY AND SPECIAL TEAMS CAPTAIN DESHAZOR EVERETT TO MULTI-YEAR EXTENSION

Recommended Posts

42 minutes ago, -JB- said:

Fans have every right to call this a horrible move.  Any move these numbnuts make will be highly criticized until one or both of the idiots are gone.  

 

that's why they don't actually.  Cause when you just automatically criticize everything then you're not judging the move, you're just using it as an opportunity to shout your already formed opinion

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Clearly Bruce trying to cleverly distract us from the  TW situation with the big news.

 

Also, as Everett started to miss more and more games due to Injury, the more interested Bruce became in a long term extension.

  • Haha 7

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
44 minutes ago, carex said:

 

that's why they don't actually.  Cause when you just automatically criticize everything then you're not judging the move, you're just using it as an opportunity to shout your already formed opinion

It has more to do with nothing the Redskins ever do works.  That part.

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Glad he got his money. But I honestly didn’t know he was still on the active roster. I Haven’t seen him in a game since September 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 hours ago, Koolblue13 said:

Guys an awful SS but a great ST guy. I like that this is done now. Our STs were horrendous for years and years and now, they're not.


He had that one game in which he knocked out both Sproles and Ertz

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 hours ago, Koolblue13 said:

Guys an awful SS but a great ST guy. I like that this is done now. Our STs were horrendous for years and years and now, they're not.

...

but is he?

... 

note few KO are returned in the current era (except by crappy teams like the Redskins) ... it's almost exclusively blocking or punt coverage

...

2,006 snaps (1,176 on ST, 830 primarily defense), 58 tackles, 33 assists

...

ST leadership hasn't delivered any notable reduction in stupid ST penalties (e.g., holding, blocking in the back)

...

fined $48K for dangerous plays as a SS in 2016 

...

so ... failed CB ... mediocre SS ... motivated ST guy who's not making much of a difference

...

this roster spot could be used for an up and comer who is waiting behind a entrenched starter ... somebody you would be happy to see starting on O or D, or a better depth player especially at a roster spot that is weak 

Edited by Brokenstriker
  • Confused 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 11/4/2019 at 10:28 AM, Brokenstriker said:

...

but is he?

... 

note few KO are returned in the current era (except by crappy teams like the Redskins) ... it's almost exclusively blocking or punt coverage

...

2,006 snaps (1,176 on ST, 830 primarily defense), 58 tackles, 33 assists

...

ST leadership hasn't delivered any notable reduction in stupid ST penalties (e.g., holding, blocking in the back)

...

fined $48K for dangerous plays as a SS in 2016 

...

so ... failed CB ... mediocre SS ... motivated ST guy who's not making much of a difference

...

this roster spot could be used for an up and comer who is waiting behind a entrenched starter ... somebody you would be happy to see starting on O or D, or a better depth player especially at a roster spot that is weak 

 

you need special teamers dude, even the pro Bowl recognizes that

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
23 hours ago, carex said:

 

you need special teamers dude, even the pro Bowl recognizes that

of course you need them … my point is he isn't all that special on teams, he's a PI liability, he's slow, he's a failed CB, he's a mediocre SS, he's missing games with a bad injury … and we could use the ST roster positions for players who are either actually "special" on teams, or waiting behind old/over-priced current starters at O or D positions

Edited by Brokenstriker

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Brokenstriker said:

of course you need them … my point is he isn't all that special on teams, he's a PI liability, he's slow, he's a failed CB, he's a mediocre SS, he's missing games with a bad injury … and we could use the ST roster positions for players who are either actually "special" on teams, or waiting behind old/over-priced current starters at O or D positions

 

Cause we have so many of them!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 hours ago, carex said:

 

Cause we have so many of them!

well we have a overpaid long term one now who promises to give away 15 yards to the other team, miss half of the season and otherwise be the SS we wish wasn't playing while running 4.6s/40yd sprints once a game when we KO, and contribute mediocrity to the 6 punts/game coverage team ... but he knows how to find the stadium so that's something.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.