DeadExField Posted November 21, 2010 Share Posted November 21, 2010 He's playing good ball right now, and when considering a back-up QB he is solid for dallas. I think they'll be set with Romo sits to pee as the franchise QB. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Jones Posted November 22, 2010 Share Posted November 22, 2010 There may be a legitimate controversy if he leads the Cowboys into the playoffs, but for that to happen they'll have to win 7 out of their last 6 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warhead36 Posted November 22, 2010 Share Posted November 22, 2010 There may be a legitimate controversy if he leads the Cowboys into the playoffs, but for that to happen they'll have to win 7 out of their last 6 Damn I know the Cowboys are talented but they must be really good if they can win more games than they play. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GhostofSparta Posted November 22, 2010 Share Posted November 22, 2010 Damn I know the Cowboys are talented but they must be really good if they can win more games than they play. If the Cowboys go 6-0 over the next 6 weeks, the league will find a way to retroactively give them a win somewhere to get them into the playoffs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Jones Posted November 22, 2010 Share Posted November 22, 2010 Damn I know the Cowboys are talented but they must be really good if they can win more games than they play. glad you see what I did there Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LadySkinsFan Posted November 22, 2010 Share Posted November 22, 2010 If the Cowboys go 6-0 over the next 6 weeks, the league will find a way to retroactively give them a win somewhere to get them into the playoffs. Yeah, they will give them our win over the Cowboys in the first game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hitman21ST Posted November 22, 2010 Share Posted November 22, 2010 Damn I know the Cowboys are talented but they must be really good if they can win more games than they play. They're that TALENTED Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
paloosa Posted November 22, 2010 Share Posted November 22, 2010 What? John Kitna? When did he learn that talent? Take a look at his stats at NFL.com http://www.nfl.com/players/jonkitna/profile?id=KIT155733 and you will see that he has 162 TD's to 158 INT's. He turns the ball over and that is the reason why he has been with Seattle, Cincy and Detroit. See a pattern here? He has played with bad teams and it might have been due to his poor play. So a younger John Kitna isn't any better than the old John Kitna. If you did your research and studied the game then you would realize that Kitna is not a good starter at all. Back to back wins with Kitna is nothing to get excited about. You need to go back and study the game yourself if you want to make statements like that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tr1 Posted November 22, 2010 Author Share Posted November 22, 2010 What? John Kitna? When did he learn that talent? Take a look at his stats at NFL.com http://www.nfl.com/players/jonkitna/profile?id=KIT155733 and you will see that he has 162 TD's to 158 INT's. He turns the ball over and that is the reason why he has been with Seattle, Cincy and Detroit. See a pattern here? He has played with bad teams and it might have been due to his poor play. So a younger John Kitna isn't any better than the old John Kitna. If you did your research and studied the game then you would realize that Kitna is not a good starter at all. Back to back wins with Kitna is nothing to get excited about. You need to go back and study the game yourself if you want to make statements like that. Today, Kitna is as good as Romo sits to pee. Of course, that's not really saying much. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
doncherry Posted November 22, 2010 Share Posted November 22, 2010 Today, Kitna is as good as Romo sits to pee.Of course, that's not really saying much. that is true, but Romo sits to pee does have a broken collar bone with which to contend..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Morneblade Posted November 22, 2010 Share Posted November 22, 2010 Today, Kitna is as good as Romo sits to pee.Of course, that's not really saying much. You could say he is better right now. This season Romo sits to pee is 1-5. Kitna is 2-2. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cowboys12 Posted November 22, 2010 Share Posted November 22, 2010 You could say he is better right now. This season Romo sits to pee is 1-5. Kitna is 2-2. Or you could look at it as the Cowboys were 1-7 under Phillips and 2-0 under Garrett. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tr1 Posted November 22, 2010 Author Share Posted November 22, 2010 Or you could look at it as the Cowboys were 1-7 under Phillips and 2-0 under Garrett. The improved play has little to do with coaching...Kitna is a better play maker. Romo sits to pee would have NEVER tried that run...he'd have tried to force something resulting in an INT. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArmchairRedskin Posted November 23, 2010 Share Posted November 23, 2010 Man, at this point I hope Romo sits to pee is back in time for our game. I'd rather face him than Kitna. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.