Rufus T Firefly Posted January 25, 2010 Share Posted January 25, 2010 Especially being that he stopped him from turning around to run around it. That's the main point I was trying to make. To continually hand-check a receiver so he has to slow down, then fall down, and think that that then makes the ball "uncatchable", so you want your penalty waved off.....doesn't work that way, nor should it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RichmondRedskin88 Posted January 25, 2010 Share Posted January 25, 2010 :bsflag::bsflag: :bsflag: :bsflag: Seriously, stop nonsense like this. Leber hit Thomas at least 3 times with his hands. To expect to get bailed out from that call because maybe, if he HADN'T hit the guy, that he might not have gotten to the ball, is not how it works. You don't deserve the benfit of the doubt for making illegal contact several times. And, again, the above 4 statements are such BS, don't bring crap like that into a discussion. When you make a post breaking up everything up and delete half of my post it does sound like crap. Though putting tons of BS flags doesn't exactly come across as great post either as clever as you may think it is. However my point was even Aikman disagreed with the call. He said the contact to him didn't seem enough to interfere. He said it himself it was way overthrown and uncatchable. Thomas cleary did some serious acting too. Leber blocked his view but he did not interfere. Thomas was in no position to go after the ball. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rufus T Firefly Posted January 25, 2010 Share Posted January 25, 2010 When you make a post breaking up everything up and delete half of my post it does sound like crap. Though putting tons of BS flags doesn't exactly come across as great post either as clever as you may think it is. However my point was even Aikman disagreed with the call. He said the contact to him didn't seem enough to interfere. He said it himself it was way overthrown and uncatchable. Thomas cleary did some serious acting too. Leber blocked his view but he did not interfere. Thomas was in no position to go after the ball. I did that because you posted 4 different statements that were just clearly nonsense. You're doing nothing but posting clearly untrue things. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RichmondRedskin88 Posted January 25, 2010 Share Posted January 25, 2010 I did that because you posted 4 different statements that were just clearly nonsense. You're doing nothing but posting clearly untrue things. What part was untrue? I'm stating what I saw and what Aikman saw. The reason I mention Aikman is because he was talking up Saints most of the game but completely disagreed with the call. Of course in Aikman's defense there wasn't much to talk about on the vikings side besides Favre's great performance until the end. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rebornempowered Posted January 25, 2010 Share Posted January 25, 2010 Question for everyone:With 19 seconds left in the game... The Vikings called a time out to stop the clock... They then huddled up and lined up, and proceeded to call another time out, yet were flagged for too many men in the huddle... Shouldn't it have been a 15 yard unsportsmanlike conduct penalty for calling 2 time outs in a row? I would like this explained also. That seems to me like a major charity call because as soon as Favre counted the players in the huddle he called a time out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rufus T Firefly Posted January 25, 2010 Share Posted January 25, 2010 What part was untrue? I'm stating what I saw and what Aikman saw. The reason I mention Aikman is because he was talking up Saints most of the game but completely disagreed with the call. Of course in Aikman's defense there wasn't much to talk about on the vikings side besides Favre's great performance until the end. That. Right there. Aikman was neither "talking up the Saints" nor did he "totally disagree" with the call. He said 'a case could be made' that the ball was uncatchable. Implying he was some kind of Saints fan that was screaming about how bad the call was are just two seperate pieces of total nonsense. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RichmondRedskin88 Posted January 25, 2010 Share Posted January 25, 2010 That. Right there.Aikman was neither "talking up the Saints" nor did he "totally disagree" with the call. He said 'a case could be made' that the ball was uncatchable. Implying he was some kind of Saints fan that was screaming about how bad the call was are just two seperate pieces of total nonsense. Ok I was watching the game with 3 others and everyone of us could tell Aikman was on the N.O side. I personally don't care about that but when he's even disagreeing that says something. He said, "the ball was clearly overthrown by 10 yds and the case should be made that it was uncatchable." He then said, "I'm not sure there was even that much contact." Thats a major difference. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rufus T Firefly Posted January 25, 2010 Share Posted January 25, 2010 Ok I was watching the game with 3 others and everyone of us could tell Aikman was on the N.O side. I personally don't care about that but when he's even disagreeing that says something. He said, "the ball was clearly overthrown by 10 yds and the case should be made that it was uncatchable." He then said, "I'm not sure there was even that much contact." Thats a major difference. :hysterical: I really don't care to respond to someone who's making up BS quotes or telling me what his buddies said like that means something. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Springfield Posted January 25, 2010 Share Posted January 25, 2010 :hysterical: I really don't care to respond to someone who's making up BS quotes or telling me what his buddies said like that means something. My buddies say that the Redskins are going to the Super Bowl next season and I'll win the lottery tomorrow. Life is great. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rufus T Firefly Posted January 25, 2010 Share Posted January 25, 2010 My buddies say that the Redskins are going to the Super Bowl next season and I'll win the lottery tomorrow. Life is great. Even Troy Aikman, who always claims the Redskins are the worst team on Earth, says he'll be shocked if they don't win 30 games next year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Springfield Posted January 25, 2010 Share Posted January 25, 2010 Even Troy Aikman, who always claims the Redskins are the worst team on Earth, says he'll be shocked if they don't win 30 games next year. It's true. My friends say so. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
redwoody86 Posted January 25, 2010 Share Posted January 25, 2010 Question for everyone:With 19 seconds left in the game... The Vikings called a time out to stop the clock... They then huddled up and lined up, and proceeded to call another time out, yet were flagged for too many men in the huddle... Shouldn't it have been a 15 yard unsportsmanlike conduct penalty for calling 2 time outs in a row? It would have been if they weren't called a second earlier for 12 men in the huddle. But when the flag came out, I thought it was going to be the 15 yarder. I thought a lot of the little things went the saints way, towards the end. It was a great game all around, and I feel badly for Favre. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ACW Posted January 25, 2010 Share Posted January 25, 2010 That PI in the end was VERY iffy, Shame one of the teams had to lose Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
royallypwned Posted January 25, 2010 Share Posted January 25, 2010 That PI in the end was VERY iffy,Shame one of the teams had to lose More like shame one of them had to win. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BRAVEONAWARPATH Posted January 25, 2010 Share Posted January 25, 2010 I don't believe that the "better" team won yesterday. :2cents: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ACW Posted January 25, 2010 Share Posted January 25, 2010 More like shame one of them had to win.:slap: NO's a good story, and so is Favre. Ah well, Dallas didn't win :dallasuck Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArmchairRedskin Posted January 25, 2010 Share Posted January 25, 2010 Prince ruined the Vikings with that gawd awful "fight" song. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.